The bloodlust in Christie’s speech against Hillary is not normal. It’s sick.

Darth Hussein Omar said:
That's not his job. The FBI is an investigative body---he's a fact gatherer and not a judge. If AG Lynch wanted to recuse herself, she should have really recused herself instead of kind of sorta recusing herself. There are other prosecutors in her department, she should have handed it to a non-political appointee and they should have determined if the evidence was sufficient for an indictment.

As it turned out, it looked for all the world that the fix was in. That's the point: even if there was no fix, it had all the appearances of one. Public confidence in two institutions was eroded but they kept Hillary in the clear.

Apparently that mattered most.
Click to expand...

Then I guess you think the fix was in when Trey Gowdy said this: "Rep. Trey Gowdy, the Chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, finally conceded in an interview on FOX News that the military could not have gotten to Benghazi in time to save the lives of the four Americans killed that night: “Whether or not they could have gotten there in time, I don’t think there is any issue with respect to that — they couldn’t.”

Trump doesn't have anything good to say about Gowdy re: Benghazi.

2016_05_15_EEC_to_TG_Chief_Counsel_Statements_pdf.jpg
 
with due respect. Bengazi has nothing to do with her Emails,or Comeys decision not to prosecute.

INHO Comey looked at a prosecution as interference in the political process for POTUS.
His intent claim doesn't hold water under "gross negligence" -not just as a cold read - there are those who were recently prosecuted.

I think he's leaving it up to the electoral process to determine Clinton's fate; and that is understandable as a Big Picture decision
 
Thing1 said:
Well, I've always thought that righties had a weird idea of "fun" anyway. They'd rather see someone slip on a banana peel and break an arm, that kind of thing.
Click to expand...

I heard that tsuke has been soaping the steps at the old folks' home. :)
 
christiefan915 said:
What I see is, anytime she gets investigated, even by republicans, and they can't find anything to pin on her, cons say "the fix is in."

Comey is a lawyer and trained to look at evidence.
Click to expand...

Did you watch the Comey hearing? Hillary destroyed 50,000 e-mails that were requested under FOIA. She let her lawyers see classified documents. She had unsecured e-mail server less safe than g-mail. All criminal offenses. But you don't care?
Would you make someone that deceitful and careless POTUS?
 
christiefan915 said:
...Chris Christie’s prosecutorial jeremiad against Hillary Clinton on Tuesday night, and the baying bloodlust of the audience, might seem normal. It is not normal.

Christie began by criticizing the Obama administration for failing to hold Clinton accountable for her “dismal record” as secretary of state. “Tonight, as a former federal prosecutor, I welcome the opportunity to hold Hillary Rodham Clinton accountable for her performance and her character,” said Christie. The crowd erupted in chants of “LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!” while Christie smiled and nodded...

A series of charges followed. Some, like Clinton’s mishandling of Libya, were at least partly legitimate. Others were bizarre. At one point, Christie faulted Clinton’s response to the mass kidnapping of schoolgirls in Nigeria, which happened after she left office. After each accusation, he asked, “Is she guilty or not guilty?” Each time, the crowd roared, “Guilty!”

Christie’s speech was logically incoherent. Even if you buy his damning interpretation of Clinton’s foreign policy errors, it doesn't make sense to discuss them as matters of criminal malfeasance. Emotionally, though, that’s in keeping with how Clinton’s bitterest foes talk about her: as a person of absolute corruption, who, through some sort of occult trick, moves through the world with intolerable impunity. As many people pointed out on Twitter, the way that Christie punctuated his inquisitorial brief with the crowd’s cries of “Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!” made him sound less like a contemporary politician than a magistrate condemning a witch...

Hating Hillary is the great theme of this gathering. T-shirts and buttons for sale around the convention revel in it: “Hillary for Prison,” “Life’s a Bitch—Don’t Vote For One,” “I Don’t Often Hate, but When I Do… I Prefer To Hate Hillary Clinton.” It’s the one thing that binds together the GOP now that its nominee has blithely jettisoned many of the party’s central principles. It is also, in its dehumanizing fervor, inescapably intertwined with misogyny. It’s not that Republicans don’t hate men—they obviously despise Barack Obama. But their loathing of Clinton is even more primal. They want to see her not just beaten but destroyed and humiliated, dressed in an orange jumpsuit and locked away. And what we saw on Tuesday night was the delirious loathing of the torch-bearing mob....

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...christie_and_his_hateful_lock_her_up_mob.html
Click to expand...

What we see from many that support Hillary is nothing more than a desire to have a female President. When are you idiots going to learn that what's between her legs doesn't make her qualified.
 
anatta said:
with due respect. Bengazi has nothing to do with her Emails,or Comeys decision not to prosecute.

INHO Comey looked at a prosecution as interference in the political process for POTUS.
His intent claim doesn't hold water under "gross negligence" -not just as a cold read - there are those who were recently prosecuted.

I think he's leaving it up to the electoral process to determine Clinton's fate; and that is understandable as a Big Picture decision
Click to expand...

Im still surprised no one is saying it should be a crime to set up a personal server to avoid any accountability for your actions. Being able to delete all your emails when under FOIA is exactly what the server was for.

You know those old movies where the cornered gangsters or roman senators burn documents before getting caught? Thats exactly what the FBI says they are ok with right now lol.
 
Infidel said:
Did you watch the Comey hearing? Hillary destroyed 50,000 e-mails that were requested under FOIA. She let her lawyers see classified documents. She had unsecured e-mail server less safe than g-mail. All criminal offenses. But you don't care?
Would you make someone that deceitful and careless POTUS?
Click to expand...

christiefan would do that because the ONLY factor she considers is that they have the same thing between her legs. People like christiefan are so dead set o havig a female President, they're willing to take one that believes what they believe despite all of the things she's done.
 
CFM said:
christiefan would do that because the ONLY factor she considers is that they have the same thing between her legs. People like christiefan are so dead set o havig a female President, they're willing to take one that believes what they believe despite all of the things she's done.
Click to expand...

Prove it racist.
 
tsuke said:
Im still surprised no one is saying it should be a crime to set up a personal server to avoid any accountability for your actions. Being able to delete all your emails when under FOIA is exactly what the server was for.

You know those old movies where the cornered gangsters or roman senators burn documents before getting caught? Thats exactly what the FBI says they are ok with right now lol.
Click to expand...
that would be a crime .I am much more then 50% certain that's why she did it, but proving it requires proving intent
 
Rana said:
He was trying! but alas, poor Chris, he just couldn't make it to the finals.
Click to expand...

So why do we care? Why are you grasping at straws with Christie? It is lame attempt to discredit Trump. You look like weak children shouting sticks and stones before you get beat to a bloody pulp.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top