Iraq & Benghazi

He obviously forgot a little thing like a 'congressional vote on the war' without which there would not have been a war.....

Well, an Iraq thread certainly wouldn't be complete without bravs asserting again that "Dems in Congress pushed him into it!"
 
He obviously forgot a little thing like a 'congressional vote on the war' without which there would not have been a war.....

Bush misused that congressional vote, he lied and did not exhaust all diplomatic measures. He lied Iraqi and Americans died. Bush and his administration is responsible for Iraq.
 
Honestly, that's a shitty assumption.

This is a thread about Benghazi & Iraq. If you want to talk about the Waco tragedy, feel free to start another thread. I never made light of it.

so having your own double standards and faux outrage pointed out to you (yes, YOU brought it up in this very thread) doesn't apply because it's ONLY supposed to be about benghazi and iraq??????

guess we can add hypocrisy to your repertoire of qualities in this thread, that you also brought up.
 
Bush misused that congressional vote, he lied and did not exhaust all diplomatic measures. He lied Iraqi and Americans died. Bush and his administration is responsible for Iraq.

It will always be Bush's war. I actually never hear anyone argue like NOVA does - not even people like Hannity.

It doesn't even matter in the context of this thread. It's not what I'm talking about in the OP. I have no doubt that if bravs was at the convention, he'd be one of those earnest, indignant lunatics pumping their fist every time Benghazi gets mentioned. He's been one of the biggest Benghazi truthers on this board as it is.
 
so having your own double standards and faux outrage pointed out to you (yes, YOU brought it up in this very thread) doesn't apply because it's ONLY supposed to be about benghazi and iraq??????

guess we can add hypocrisy to your repertoire of qualities in this thread, that you also brought up.

Again - where is my double standard, STY?

Can you give me a specific post, or sentiment? I thought you qualified that you weren't talking about me specifically?
 
Bush misused that congressional vote, he lied and did not exhaust all diplomatic measures. He lied Iraqi and Americans died. Bush and his administration is responsible for Iraq.
Sorry moron....the bill was THE WAR RESOLUTION....not the talking resolution....and EVERYONE KNEW exactly what they were voting for.....

Dozens of UN resolutions over quite a few years meant talking was over.....
 
Sorry moron....the bill was THE WAR RESOLUTION....not the talking resolution....and EVERYONE KNEW exactly what they were voting for.....

Dozens of UN resolutions over quite a few years meant talking was over.....

And the inner apologist is unleashed!

Bravs, you're the guy I'm talking about in the OP. Read it - that's you.
 
So this election Democrats are supporting an Iraq war backer who is a know foreign policy leaning hawk and Republicans have chosen an isolationist who doesn't seem to give a sh*t about anyone.

Wouldn't that mean they have at least learned their lesson while democrats are backing what they claim to dislike?
 
Honestly, that's a shitty assumption.

This is a thread about Benghazi & Iraq. If you want to talk about the Waco tragedy, feel free to start another thread. I never made light of it.

Yeah, we don't want the double standard shoved in the liberal faces....how about this one, 500.000 Iraqi children.....

The deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children was worth it for Iraq's non existent WMD's

 
so having your own double standards and faux outrage pointed out to you (yes, YOU brought it up in this very thread) doesn't apply because it's ONLY supposed to be about benghazi and iraq??????

guess we can add hypocrisy to your repertoire of qualities in this thread, that you also brought up.

Yawn, Thing doesn't have double standards, that would be you. You condemn everything liberal administrations do, but when Republicans do wrong there is no comment from you, even though you claim you attack both. Here is your opportunity to attack the Republicans and all you can say is Waco.
 
And the inner apologist is unleashed!

Bravs, you're the guy I'm talking about in the OP. Read it - that's you.

Just a personal attack as expected....to stupid to respond like an adult.....
thats ok, I don,t have time to waste on you anyway....
 
Yawn, Thing doesn't have double standards, that would be you. You condemn everything liberal administrations do, but when Republicans do wrong there is no comment from you, even though you claim you attack both. Here is your opportunity to attack the Republicans and all you can say is Waco.

Republicans had nothing to do with Waco....why attack them
 
Again - where is my double standard, STY?

Can you give me a specific post, or sentiment?
what's your position on the 'no bill' for hillary and her 'not sending classified material' through a private email server as SoS?

I thought you qualified that you weren't talking about me specifically?
I did, but after you called it a shitty assumption, you doubled down by qualifying your thread of hypocrisy, double standards, and faux outrage as applying to the rights clamoring of iraq and benghazi only
 
Just a personal attack as expected....to stupid to respond like an adult.....
thats ok, I don,t have time to waste on you anyway....

How is that a personal attack? I'm not calling you names.

The OP is about you. It's who you are. And you do waste your time apologizing for Bush on these threads, because you've already done it over a thousand times, and it isn't any less of a lie now than it was when you started.
 
what's your position on the 'no bill' for hillary and her 'not sending classified material' through a private email server as SoS?

I did, but after you called it a shitty assumption, you doubled down by qualifying your thread of hypocrisy, double standards, and faux outrage as applying to the rights clamoring of iraq and benghazi only

No, STY. You made the assertion - right now, you don't know how I feel about the Hillary stuff. You're not allowed to ask for it to gain credibility.

I want the exact posts, or quotes. You do this on so many threads. Chime in w/ some gun or WACO thing, and lump me in with "Joe Liberal." I'm not letting you off the hook this time. Find me a post.
 
Every time someone like Christie tears into Hillary about Benghazi at this convention, you see the righteous indignation from so many in the crowd, applauding and cheering earnestly like there has never been a more egregious foreign policy debacle in their lives.

But wait – there was! In fact, one that didn’t just cost 4 American lives, but over 4,000. Oh, and also countless other innocent lives. And nearly bankrupted the country. And was started on false pretenses. And lasted 10 years. And destabilized the region. And which Bush made light of after the fact.

Spare me, you Republican hypocrites. Every single one of you was calling any war opponent a traitor & terrorist sympathizer, and defending Bush to the end even after it was clear that they had deceived the public, to get us into a war. I can’t remember a more obvious example of blind partisan double-standards & false outrage.

I didn't realize Bush was running for president.
 
No, STY. You made the assertion - right now, you don't know how I feel about the Hillary stuff. You're not allowed to ask for it to gain credibility.

I want the exact posts, or quotes. You do this on so many threads. Chime in w/ some gun or WACO thing, and lump me in with "Joe Liberal." I'm not letting you off the hook this time. Find me a post.

Classic Troll stuff.
 
Back
Top