Massachusetts AG writes law banning all assault weapons.!!!

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
The attorney general is just a cop and is not allowed to write laws.!!!!

http://www.nationalreview.com/corne...ney-general-unilaterally-bans-assault-weapons

july 20 2016 Without the legislature, without the governor, and without any form of public consultation, the attorney general of Massachusetts has today rewritten the state’s 1998 Gun Control Act. In an edict sent out this morning, AG Maura Healey explained that the law no longer meant what it had meant since 1998, but instead would mean what she wanted it to mean.

Writing in the Boston Globe, Healey outlined the changes: The Massachusetts assault weapons ban mirrors the federal ban Congress allowed to expire in 2004. It prohibits the sale of specific weapons like the Colt AR-15 and AK-47 and explicitly bans “copies or duplicates” of those weapons. But gun manufacturers have taken it upon themselves to define what a “copy” or “duplicate” weapon is. They market “state compliant” copycat versions of their assault weapons to Massachusetts buyers. They sell guns without a flash suppressor or folding or telescoping stock, for example, small tweaks that do nothing to limit the lethalness of the weapon. That will end now.

On Wednesday, we are sending a directive to all gun manufacturers and dealers that makes clear that the sale of these copycat assault weapons is illegal in Massachusetts. With this directive, we will ensure we get the full protection intended when lawmakers enacted our assault weapons ban, not the watered-down version of those protections offered by gun manufacturers.
Click to expand...
 
Like to hear this witch justify her usurpation of the legislature. She would probably say, like Obama, that since the legislators are not doing anything, she is forced to take matters into her own hands.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Like to hear this witch justify her usurpation of the legislature. She would probably say, like Obama, that since the legislators are not doing anything, she is forced to take matters into her own hands.
Click to expand...

The 1994 ban should never have been allowed to lapse in the first place.

Sent from my LENOVO Lenovo K50-t5 Using Ez Forum for Android
 
I suspect that she's just grandstanding, to help her next election bid; because more then likely this is going to get destroyed by an appeal to a lower Supreme Court.
 
Massachusetts AG writes law banning all assault weapons.!!!
Click to expand...

This is as ignorant as it is wrong and a lie.

No ‘new law’ is being written:

The directive specifically outlines two tests to determine what constitutes a “copy” or “duplicate” of a prohibited weapon. If a gun’s operating system is essentially the same as that of a banned weapon, or if the gun has components that are interchangeable with those of a banned weapon, it’s a “copy” or “duplicate,” and it is illegal. Assault weapons prohibited under our laws cannot be altered in any way to make their sale or possession legal in Massachusetts.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion...weapons-ban/eEvOBklTriWcGznmXqSpYM/story.html
Click to expand...

If the state legislature doesn’t like the way the AG is implementing the law, they are at liberty to amend or repeal it.

And any state resident who believes his rights are being violated is at liberty to file suit in court to challenge the law’s implementation.
 
F_Donald_Weldon said:
This is as ignorant as it is wrong and a lie.

No ‘new law’ is being written:



If the state legislature doesn’t like the way the AG is implementing the law, they are at liberty to amend or repeal it.

And any state resident who believes his rights are being violated is at liberty to file suit in court to challenge the law’s implementation.
Click to expand...

At what cost to go through the process?
 
Milagro said:
Don't, just oppose your interpretation of it.

Sent from my LENOVO Lenovo K50-t5 Using Ez Forum for Android
Click to expand...
The USSC made the best interpretation of the 2nd Amendment based on the historical information leading up to its passage and the words which clearly say, ""A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State", (and) "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms," (and) "shall not be infringed." Each of those clauses are absolute in intent. We do need that militia, which amounts to every able bodied man (person now) between the ages of 17 and 45. Each must furnish his own weapon of sufficient grade weapons to compete with standing army weapons. This was an absolute intent of the founders. The people have a right to keep and bear arms such that it can support the first AND provide for the individual welfare, food gathering (at will) and to use in any legal way desired. None of those rights shall be infringed.

Gun control activist who want more control are 1. autocratic and 2. pretty damned stupid.
 
dnsmith1935 said:
We do need that militia, which amounts to every able bodied man (person now) between the ages of 17 and 45. Each must furnish his own weapon of sufficient grade weapons to compete with standing army weapons.
Click to expand...

I notice that you exempted yourself from the new revolutionary army.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top