Comey: ‘No reasonable prosecutor’ would have charged Clinton under ‘gross negligence’

Establishment said:
So, she's just an idiot, then?
Click to expand...

She is no idiot, but arrogant, hubristic and almost Russian in her capability to rewrite history she most certainly is without question. Now Trump is an ocean going arsehole as well, it is just mindbogglingly how crazy the US is just now.

Sent from my LENOVO Lenovo K50-t5 Using Ez Forum for Android
 
anatta said:
the emails showed Clinton had knowledge of archiving..does that count??
why would she go thru all this ( and lie extensively when caught) if it wasn't at minimum a FOIA dodge??

ANYWAYS...WHY IS A BUNCH OF FBI INVESTIGATORS MAKING PROSECUTORIAL DECISIONs ???? hmm?? :awesome:
Click to expand...

Why are.
Is is singular.
Aside from your vernacular butchery you do realize that Comey was a prosecutor right?
 
anatta said:
I barely recall it
. it was all part of the firing of the US AG's which was the much bigger story -and it was an institutional failing -not one of personal character.
What damn Hillary is her shitty judgment here, and in her job, along wth her personal arrogane she could lie her way thru this.

That goes right against her abilities and character ( shitty judgment means poor performance)
Click to expand...
See, you barely recall it, do you know why, because the Democrats didn't go all ballistic and demand investigation after investigation.

Excuses
 
Rana said:
See, you barely recall it, do you know why, because the Democrats didn't go all ballistic and demand investigation after investigation.

Excuses
Click to expand...
get out of here..it was the firings that was the story - that I recall well..the emails were of passing interest.
for all your's and the Dem's "excuses" you'd do well to remember she brought all of this on herself. She lied about classified info transversing her server .
She lied about using only 1 device. She did all this to conceal her Emials from FOIA.

Abedin lawsuit testimony shows Clinton wanting no access to private emails
Associated Press:

Longtime Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin said in a legal proceeding that Clinton did not want the private emails that she mixed in with State Department emails on her private computer server to be accessible to "anybody," according to transcripts.....

would imagine anybody who has personal email doesn't want that personal email to be read by anybody else," Abedin explained. "I read it the same way as she has written it."

But Clinton's private server contained tens of thousands of work-related emails as well as private messages, and her decision to conduct both private and government business on her system meant that she kept control of both types of correspondence, effectively preventing her State Department correspondence from being archived by the agency and made available for public records requests
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...nton_wanting_no_access_to_private_emails.html
 
Despite his defense of Comey's character and justification for why he didn't recommend prosecution, Hosko said he believes the elements for indictment were clearly met based on a cold read of the federal statute to which Comey referred.

Comey said Tuesday,
"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."
Click to expand...

The sticking point is Comey's use of the phrase "extremely careless," Hosko said.

"To me that has the same DNA as gross negligence that the statute requires. Those are identical twins," he said.

Under the statute, it is a felony to mishandle classified information intentionally or through gross negligence. Hosko said Comey seemed to introduce an element of intent that is not enshrined in that statute.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/06/why-fbi-director-comey-didnt-recommend-prosecution-for-clinton.html
 
anatta said:
so her untruthful statements under oath to Congress.. just let that slide?

It always amazes me that the Clintonistas low bar for Clinton is an actual indictment.
her "extreme carelessness" "negligence" and lying to America are really no big deal
Click to expand...

Trump is lying right now but that doesn't bother you one bit.
 
anatta said:
prosecutor/judge and jury rolled into one. I respect his decision and Comey himself - but that is just too much centralized power.
He absolutely missed precedent (and is that an actual need?) having more then 1 mind to investigate and then decide to prosecute
is a much better way
Click to expand...

Who the fuck are you to decide?
 
anatta said:
bald face lies to the American public while in the spotlight don't bother you? Did the Bush adm us only the RNC server?. was this a one time event or a pattern of concealment?
Click to expand...

22 million one time events you fucking imbecile
 
anatta said:
I barely recall it
. it was all part of the firing of the US AG's which was the much bigger story -and it was an institutional failing -not one of personal character.
What damn Hillary is her shitty judgment here, and in her job, along wth her personal arrogane she could lie her way thru this.

That goes right against her abilities and character ( shitty judgment means poor performance)
Click to expand...

It most certainly was a personal failure you fucking liar. A Dubya failure.
 
Rune said:
Trump is lying right now but that doesn't bother you one bit.
Click to expand...
I don't expect Trump to understand gov't as well as Clinton (or as well as she should -she apparently doesn't know her own job classification rules )..
what were you saying? oh never mind -the idiot wind blows on and off
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top