Donald Trump DID NOT praise Saddam Hussain

cawacko said:
He killed, maimed and raped thousands upon thousands of people in his country who did nothing wrong. That's nothing to be outraged over? Is that what you'd like to see happen here?
Click to expand...

That's a stretch. Trump wouldn't do that and that's not what he meant. He couldn't do it even if tried.

But yes, Saddam was an outrage. Problem is that part of the world is so dysfunctional places like Iraq are better off under ruthless despots than totalitarian religious regimes.

'Good' can be a relative term.
 
anatta said:
I'm getting better at deciphering TrumpSpeak. It's a twisted path of rhetoric..
Clinton on the other hand you have to try to dig thru the pandering.

Neither of these folks are Churchillian type speakers.
Click to expand...
Does that mean you have to dumb yourself down to understand him? Now Darth doesn't have to dumb himself down, he is already a stupid Trump supporter, but I would imagine that someone like you would have to try to be stupid to understand Trump. I don't understand him, he is way below my level.
 
Rana said:
Does that mean you have to dumb yourself down to understand him? Now Darth doesn't have to dumb himself down, he is already a stupid Trump supporter, but I would imagine that someone like you would have to try to be stupid to understand Trump. I don't understand him, he is way below my level.
Click to expand...

That you would vote for Hillary doesn't say much for your own intelligence---or integrity.
 
Rana said:
Does that mean you have to dumb yourself down to understand him? Now Darth doesn't have to dumb himself down, he is already a stupid Trump supporter, but I would imagine that someone like you would have to try to be stupid to understand Trump. I don't understand him, he is way below my level.
Click to expand...
it's year and years and years of listening to politicians - I'm sure you do the same.
I know their themes (both Clintons and Trumps) we know most of their positions; so you distill out the junk noise and pull out the relevancies.

I would not slam Darth. He's honest about Trump's failings as much as he supports him-
which is more then I can say about many Clintonistas who blindly defend her from"witch hunts" etc.
That's intellectual honesty -more important then situational IQ
 
anatta said:
it's year and years and years of listening to politicians - I'm sure you do the same.
I know their themes (both Clintons and Trumps) we know most of their positions; so you distill out the junk noise and pull out the relevancies.

I would not slam Darth. He's honest about Trump's failings as much as he supports him-
which is more then I can say about many Clintonistas who blindly defend her from"witch hunts" etc.
That's intellectual honesty -more important then situational IQ
Click to expand...
They are witch hunts, the Republicans even admitted to such! If they went after others the way they do the Clinton's then I would believe it would sincere concern, but they don't, so I am sorry, I have also been around for a long time and I haven't seen anything like it. They admire Reagan that should give you a clue right there!

I
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
That you would vote for Hillary doesn't say much for your own intelligence---or integrity.
Click to expand...
In fact, I am just going to start spouting nonsense and make up my own facts like Donald does and when you all challenge me, I'll just use the Trump excuse, you let him, so why not everyone else!
 
Rana said:
They are witch hunts, the Republicans even admitted to such! If they went after others the way they do the Clinton's then I would believe it would sincere concern, but they don't, so I am sorry, I have also been around for a long time and I haven't seen anything like it. They admire Reagan that should give you a clue right there!
Click to expand...
yes there are witch hunts - there were quite a few back under Bill Clinton.
But this entire Email affair is of her own doing; her own choice to lie about it, and her own choices to conceal.
She calls it a "mistake" like giving the wrong answer on a test. It's much deeper than that as her cover up shows.
 
It was a dumb thing to say. But any intellectually honest person knows and understands the point he was making, namely: you don't play mamby pamby with terrorists like Obama has done.
 
J Craft said:
It was a dumb thing to say. But any intellectually honest person knows and understands the point he was making, namely: you don't play mamby pamby with terrorists like Obama has done.
Click to expand...

No, an honest person doesn't understand, he will not be able to kill terrorists in the fashion Saddam killed his own citizens in this country, nor will he be able to do as he pleases in foreign countries, either.
Obama's drone policies are hardly namby pamby. ISIS is also being defeated so that is hardly namby pamby.
 
anatta said:
leaving individuals(here) out of that - there is rabid 3 monkeys of No speak, No see and No hear among large swatches of Clintonistas.
Click to expand...

You just made the statement that Trump has never lied to your face, talk about the 3 monkeys!
 
Rana said:
You just made the statement that Trump has never lied to your face, talk about the 3 monkeys!
Click to expand...
please don't post like Rune -it's helpful to make a reference I can understand.. yes. he "lied" about the Birther crap if that is what you mean.
The Clintonistas have to constantly live in denial unless one overlooks her works a Sec of state, as well as her lying on the Emails.
It goes to her character and judgment
 
He brought up Saddam because he liked the dictator's resolve to kill his people he didn't like without trial, review or even Miranda rights.
This is what Trump really admired about Saddam.
If you listen to Trump's words closely, that is what he said.
 
anatta said:
please don't post like Rune -it's helpful to make a reference I can understand.. yes. he "lied" about the Birther crap if that is what you mean.
The Clintonistas have to constantly live in denial unless one overlooks her works a Sec of state, as well as her lying on the Emails.
It goes to her character and judgment
Click to expand...

huh?

Trump is a pathological liar and for your to state he hasn't lied to your face is nonsense and show that you are in denial as well

http://www.dailywire.com/news/4834/trumps-101-lies-hank-berrien
 
anatta said:
it's year and years and years of listening to politicians - I'm sure you do the same.
I know their themes (both Clintons and Trumps) we know most of their positions; so you distill out the junk noise and pull out the relevancies.

I would not slam Darth. He's honest about Trump's failings as much as he supports him-
which is more then I can say about many Clintonistas who blindly defend her from"witch hunts" etc.
That's intellectual honesty -more important then situational IQ
Click to expand...

Then the GOP shouldn't have said outright that they only wanted to target her.

On September 29, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy boasted that the Benghazi panel had been intended to and succeeded in hurting Clinton's poll numbers in the presidential race. A former Benghazi committee staffer corroborated the claim, saying the "partisan investigation" had shifted its focus almost exclusively to Clinton. In light of the admission, the New York Times editorial board called on Republicans to "shut down the Benghazi Committee," which it deemed a "charade" and a "laughable crusade."

Two Congressmen And Ex-Benghazi Committee Staffer Admit Partisan Nature Of The Committee. Since September 29, three credible Republicans have admitted to the partisan nature of the House Select Committee on Benghazi and its primary goal of tarnishing Hillary Clinton. While the first admission may have been inadvertent -- House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) boasted that the committee had achieved its goal of damaging Clinton's poll numbers during an interview with Fox News about his candidacy for House Speaker -- since then, former Benghazi committee staffer Bradley F. Podliska and a second Republican congressman, Rep. Richard Hanna (R-NY), have come forward and admitted the committee was "designed to go after" Clinton.

"A former investigator [Bradley F. Podliska] for the Republicans on the House Select Committee on Benghazi plans to file a complaint in federal court next month alleging that he was fired unlawfully in part because his superiors opposed his efforts to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the 2012 attack on the American diplomatic mission in the Libyan city. Instead, they focused primarily on the role of the State Department and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, he said."
 
anatta said:
please don't post like Rune -it's helpful to make a reference I can understand.. yes. he "lied" about the Birther crap if that is what you mean.
The Clintonistas have to constantly live in denial unless one overlooks her works a Sec of state, as well as her lying on the Emails.
It goes to her character and judgment
Click to expand...

Maybe there's categories of liars and lying lol.

Trump plays loose with the facts like most politicians do. But he has yet to blame a terrorist attack on an embassy on a video because it's politically inexpedient to tell the truth. That's lying on a different plane.

And who knows, maybe he'll get the chance to and if he does, I'll kick his ass to the political curb. And I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be alone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top