Canceled 2016.4
Verified User
He said that Hussain was a bad guy three times, but added that there were no terrorist in Iraq under Hussain's rule. Then comes the always retarded CNN who has zero ratings without Trump.
No, he praised how he killed his own citizens that he thought were terrorists without a trial. So, he did indeed praise him, you can twist this anyway you wish, but he praised the guy, who supported terrorists, but killed his own countrymen.He said that Hussain was a bad guy three times, but added that there were no terrorist in Iraq under Hussain's rule. Then comes the always retarded CNN who has zero ratings without Trump.
He said that Hussain was a bad guy three times, but added that there were no terrorist in Iraq under Hussain's rule. Then comes the always retarded CNN who has zero ratings without Trump.
What was the purpose of even bring up Saddam? To show there were no terrorists because he killed thousands upon thousands of his own people? That's what we want here in America?
Cawacko doesn't live in a cave, you have him confused with Trump supporters like yourself.The purpose of bringing up Husain is the current lack of leadership in Iraq and the current proliferation of ISIS terrorist that are killing Americans and others around the World. You may now go back to your cave.

What was the purpose of even bring up Saddam? To show there were no terrorists because he killed thousands upon thousands of his own people? That's what we want here in America?
He said that Hussain was a bad guy three times, but added that there were no terrorist in Iraq under Hussain's rule. Then comes the always retarded CNN who has zero ratings without Trump.

What was the purpose of even bring up Saddam? To show there were no terrorists because he killed thousands upon thousands of his own people? That's what we want here in America?
You don't think Iraq [and arguably the whole middle east] would be better off if we left Saddam in power? That's pretty much the consensus isn't it?
Isn't that tantamount to saying he was good for region?
We fvcked up in Iraq no doubt. But Saddam promoted terrorism in the region. He paid families of suicide bombers. So I get the argument of saying we shouldn't have gone into Iraq. Making that argument by saying Saddam killed a bunch of terrorists is not how it should be made.
yes he did. he also went after the kurds, and ran torture ( mostly uday and qusay) houses.We fvcked up in Iraq no doubt. But Saddam promoted terrorism in the region. He paid families of suicide bombers. So I get the argument of saying we shouldn't have gone into Iraq. Making that argument by saying Saddam killed a bunch of terrorists is not how it should be made.
yes he did. he also went after the kurds, and ran torture ( mostly uday and qusay) houses.
Trump is saying "saddam is bad" - but in the case of allowing AQ to function/nest in Iraq he went after them..
Cheney's CRAP about 'deep, longlasting, far-reaching" ties between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda, was another lie.
I think he's making a larger point about how interventionism causes "blowback"...but it'sTrumpSpeak -so who knows?
Saddam kept the Islamists amongst his population at bay, presumably, by killing them. I can't get outraged over that.
But Saddam was an evil man that did a lot of wrong: and Trump could have left 'good' out of it but most people get what he's saying.
I'm getting better at deciphering TrumpSpeak. It's a twisted path of rhetoric..But the larger point [which practically all liberals agree with] gets lost because he said 'good' lol.
Yep, kinda like sayin hitler wasn't so bad cause he liked kittens.........
All those American & British politicians that went after sadaam must of chocked upon hearing him say it..........
Many Americans died getting rid of that guy, not to mention hundreds of thousands of Iraqis & millions left homeless & now hopeless..........
He can do no wrong w/ his fans, even as he destroys his own party & their legacy..........