FBI completes Clinton email probe, recommends no criminal charges

Jarod said:
Where did they say she broke the law? WOW, you are willing to spit out any shit today arnt you?
Click to expand...

they said that there was no 'intent', much like waterboarding is not torture...............

so it looks like you're just as willing to spit out any shit today as well, right?
 
cawacko said:
I'll let this article lay it out for you. Have you been busy today? Would have thought you would be the first one here to celebrate this ruling and embrace Hillary's integrity.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/fbi[...Defense about "vast quantities " not met?? :)
Click to expand...
 
cawacko said:
I'll let this article lay it out for you. Have you been busy today? Would have thought you would be the first one here to celebrate this ruling and embrace Hillary's integrity.


http://www.mediaite.com/online/fbi-hillary-clinton-broke-the-law-we-just-dont-really-care/
Click to expand...

Here is an article outlining past cases and why some are prosecuted and some aren't, but mostly because the laws in the past were not clear on the subject matter and it was also a matter of intent.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/hillary-clinton-prosecution-past-cases-221744
 
SmarterthanYou said:
they said that there was no 'intent', much like waterboarding is not torture...............

so it looks like you're just as willing to spit out any shit today as well, right?
Click to expand...

What a stupid analogy! lol I dare anyone to be water boarded and claim it isn't torture. It is demonstrably torture.

Apparently, you didn't get to interview all the people the FBI interviewed to come with their conclusions.
 
Jarod said:
From Benghazi to Emails and next Clinton Foundation. Is it not clear that this is simply a false scandal machine?
Click to expand...

did something turn out false?.....she lied about the cause of Benghazi, she lied about her emails......the Obama appointee says we shouldn't prosecute......that doesn't make anything false about the scandals.....
 
Jarod said:
If you don't have the required intent, you did not break the law! Its simple. I just came back in the Country this morning.
Click to expand...

Saying he didn't believe he had enough evidence to prosecute does not mean she did not break the law.
 
Jarod said:
If you don't have the required intent, you did not break the law! Its simple. I just came back in the Country this morning.
Click to expand...

so if I go to trial in florida because I open carried a long gun, but was under the impression that long gun open carry was legal because I'm from TX, you'd acquit me?
 
Jarod said:
If you don't have the required intent, you did not break the law! Its simple. I just came back in the Country this morning.
Click to expand...

So if I accidentally break the speed limit, I should not be prosecuted ?

If I accidentally send the plans to make an atom bomb to Iran, I should not be prosecuted?

If my car accidentally rolls down the street all by itself, and runs over a child, I should not be prosecuted ?

Is that about right ? I had no INTENTION to do any of the above....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top