LGBT Crowd Eyes Preschool Children

the problem is you still have in your head that 'gay is bad' therefore teaching kids about gays is teaching kids about 'bad things.' once you are no longer stress about two people raising a happy family with each other the rest falls into place. I encourage you to not stress about these things. A functioning family unit with two moms or dads that love their kid will not be the end of society, I promise you.

Whilst agreeing with you for the most part, I do feel that there is an element of social engineering going on here as well. Children grow up far too quickly these days, why can't they enjoy their childhoods without being subjected to adult concerns? I think this just about covers it!

Social justice “rights” are subjectively invented and cannot be discovered from nature. For this reason, social justice is arbitrary and irrational in essence, no matter how it is rationalized. Social justice ideas are in continual flux and are unsteady as a foundation for law.

Social justice ideas emerge subjectively in elite liberal groups in a manner similar to how pagan myths emerge from the shamans of primitive tribes. The intellect of the shaman is quieted during mystical reveries as deep feelings and magical thinking well up from his subconscious realm. Freedom is unknown to primitive tribes, due to the arbitrary government of witch doctors who rule through fear and arbitrary taboos.

In like manner, the rule of the liberal elites would subject us all to arbitrary, irrational, politically correct codes of speech, thought, and behavior. Like the shamans, liberals attempt to enforce their taboos through intimidation. The rule of shamans requires tribal group-think. This is why the ultimate triumph of social justice theory must signal the end of personal freedom.

A second fatal weakness of social justice theory is that social justice is always politicized in its practical applications. Social justice theory sanctions the re-engineering of society according to the arbitrary preferences of those with power. Since social justice is arbitrary in definition and application and no two theorists can agree upon how to measure social injustice, those with political power can hire the social justice theorists who best suit their biases and preferences.

http://www.nourishingobscurity.com/2011/02/human-rights-versus-human-rights-2/
 
Whilst agreeing with you for the most part, I do feel that there is an element of social engineering going on here as well. Children grow up far too quickly these days, why can't they enjoy their childhoods without being subjected to adult concerns? I think this just about covers it!

And that's all you need to know about it, particularly the social engineering part.

If we still live in a republic, tax payers should have a say in whether their kids should be subjected to the latest social engineering fad. But that's never good enough for the Social Justice Crusaders: like the shamans in your link, they'll conjure up a way to make it a matter of 'rights', then off to the federal court system they go.

Then the people get the latest fad whether they want it or not. It's issues like this that are behind the Brexit vote and behind the rise of Trump over here.

People have the sense they've lost control of their government.
 
No, it doesn't. Gay brainwashing vs opening communication with the divine. Hmmmm. You lose, goat worshipper.

Your "god" supposedly impregnated a young Jewish girl without her parents' knowledge or permission. Disgusting.

You want children indoctrinated with that filth?
 
Your "god" supposedly impregnated a young Jewish girl without her parents' knowledge or permission. Disgusting.

You want children indoctrinated with that filth?
Which graphic Bible have you been leering at, pervert?

Now go find a proper KJV Bible and discuss the lunacy that you just spewed all over this thread.

I'll understand if you crawl back in bed with Leon and suck your thumb.... or his.
 
Which graphic Bible have you been leering at, pervert? Now go find a proper KJV Bible and discuss the lunacy that you just spewed all over this thread. I'll understand if you crawl back in bed with Leon and suck your thumb.... or his.

So you are ashamed of the sexual activities of the "divine"?

What about that time sky daddy supposedly made a woman out of a man's rib and made everyone on the planet a result of the incestuous fucking of their spawn.

Should that be taught to kids?
 
So you are ashamed of the sexual activities of the "divine"?

What about that time sky daddy supposedly made a woman out of a man's rib and made everyone on the planet a result of the incestuous fucking of their spawn.

Should that be taught to kids?
Where's your Bible?
 
Your "friend couldn't.

Can you name eras when hedonism ruled and it never turned well?

I'll understand if you can't either.
 
Where's your Bible?

"And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch." (Genesis 4:17)

Who was Cain's wife, if Adam and Eve were the progenitors of the entire human race and Cain was their son?
 
Adam and Eve were formed by the hand of God which means they had to be pretty close to perfection from the beginning. Their genetic makeup had to be so so pure that any concerns about incest between their direct offspring would've been zero.
 
Adam and Eve were formed by the hand of God which means they had to be pretty close to perfection from the beginning. Their genetic makeup had to be so so pure that any concerns about incest between their direct offspring would've been zero.

Prove it.

I'll understand if you can't.

You want children to learn about incest in schools?
 
Back
Top