It is Time To Drug Test Corporate and Religious Welfare Recipients

[Mott the Hoople]

Hypocrites want the poor to have to pee in a cup for the pittance they receive in assistance.

The rich on the other hand should be able to buy their way out of anything.

Well I'm not going to demonize the rich for being rich....just as I'm not going to demonize the poor for being poor. My point is that people have rights and forcing people to comply with drug tests in which a positive result can have criminal consequences is a violation on a persons Constitutional rights.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Well I'm not going to demonize the rich for being rich....just as I'm not going to demonize the poor for being poor. My point is that people have rights and forcing people to comply with drug tests in which a positive result can have criminal consequences is a violation on a persons Constitutional rights.

Employers can require employees to submit to drug tests, so GovCo can require welfare recipients to submit as well.

 

[Seahawk]

Well I'm not going to demonize the rich for being rich....just as I'm not going to demonize the poor for being poor. My point is that people have rights and forcing people to comply with drug tests in which a positive result can have criminal consequences is a violation on a persons Constitutional rights.

Why has it been held constitutional for employers, including the Federal government, to drug screen potential or current employers?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Employers can require employees to submit to drug tests, so GovCo can require welfare recipients to submit as well.

have you ever been taught the difference between public sector and private sector?

 

[evince]

because you don't have to work somewhere


its a choice to be employed

 

[MAGA MAN]

have you ever been taught the difference between public sector and private sector?

Why do you insist on axing irrelevant questions?

 

[MAGA MAN]

because you don't have to work somewhere


its a choice to be employed

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

SO YOU CHOOSE NOT TO WORK

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Why do you insist on axing irrelevant questions?

why do you insist that the bill of rights doesn't apply to the government?

private employers set the criteria for working for their company. governments are restricted by the constitution and bill of rights. see the difference now?

 

[Legion Troll]

why do you insist that the bill of rights doesn't apply to the government? private employers set the criteria for working for their company. governments are restricted by the constitution and bill of rights. see the difference now?

Careful. He's an engineer.

To explain further, a .308 has a bullet that (oddly enough) is .308 inches in diameter.

Based on my knowledge of mechanical components, that doesn't sound right, since the bullet would probably jam.

Based on my knowledge of ballistics, it is correct.

I'm not an expert on firearms by any stretch, but I think that you'd blow up a gun if you fired a bullet that size through it.

You arrogantly claimed to have a knowledge of ballistics, yet you clearly don't, because a bullet that size would blow up a gun in your face. Try it and see.

 

[MAGA MAN]

why do you insist that the bill of rights doesn't apply to the government?

private employers set the criteria for working for their company. governments are restricted by the constitution and bill of rights. see the difference now?

I saw the difference when I was a high school student back in the 70's.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I saw the difference when I was a high school student back in the 70's.

so you just choose to ignore the supreme law of the land. something I knew about you years ago anyway.

 

[evince]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

SO YOU CHOOSE NOT TO WORK

not all places test huhh creatin

 

[Celticguy]

have you ever been taught the difference between public sector and private sector?

If you don't wish to submit to drug tests at work, don't work there.
If you don't wish to submit to drug tests at the parasite center, don't be a parasite.
It's all voluntary.
That said, sounds expensive to me.

 

[MAGA MAN]

so you just choose to ignore the supreme law of the land. something I knew about you years ago anyway.

It's GovCo that ignores it, routinely. If FedCo restricted itself from its Constitutional mandate, it would have far fewer employees to worry about.

I'm not really sure what you're arguing about. What's your point?

 

[MAGA MAN]

If you don't wish to submit to drug tests at work, don't work there.
If you don't wish to submit to drug tests at the parasite center, don't be a parasite.
It's all voluntary.
That said, sounds expensive to me.

According to Desh, welfare isn't a choice; woking is.

 

[evince]

According to Desh, welfare isn't a choice; woking is.

go get the post of mine you claim exists you fucking liar

 

[Seahawk]

because you don't have to work somewhere


its a choice to be employed

It is a choice to take welfare too then.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk

 

[SmarterthanYou]

If you don't wish to submit to drug tests at work, don't work there.

agreed

If you don't wish to submit to drug tests at the parasite center, don't be a parasite.

again, popular shouldn't overrule fundamental rights. if it did, we'd be reduced to muskets and black powder by now.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

It's GovCo that ignores it, routinely. If FedCo restricted itself from its Constitutional mandate, it would have far fewer employees to worry about.

I do not disagree with this. If the government followed constitutional limits and mandates, we'd have a more solid economy instead of 1,000 elected officials, appointed bureaucrats, and lobbyists keeping a bubble inflated.

I'm not really sure what you're arguing about. What's your point?

that as long as these unconstitutional programs exist, doesn't negate the basic rights of those who use them.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

It is a choice to take welfare too then.

is it also a choice to not buy a firearm because of excess taxes, license fees, background checks?