zappasguitar
Well-known member
is that what you think i said?
It's clear that's what you said.
"regulations that prohibited people from carrying a gun got them killed"
is that what you think i said?
' Gun control legislation introduced by Australia 20 years ago has not only stopped mass shootings from happening, but also led to a fall in gun-related fatalities, a new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association shows.
Rapid fire weapons were banned in Australia in 1996 following a mass shooting, which killed 35 people. A year later, the government introduced a buy-back scheme. Over the next few years, over 700,000 semi-automatic weapons, pump action rifles and handguns were purchased by the federal government in two schemes. '
https://www.rt.com/news/347917-austr...control-study/
That's really annoying, eh boys ? Somebody actually regulated guns and kept people alive.
Oh I know he doesn't. He's one of those who believe themselves above the laws they don't like.
It's clear that's what you said.
"regulations that prohibited people from carrying a gun got them killed"
that is not what you posted earlier.
what got these people killed, the regulations against guns in the club, or the guy with the gun?
According to your words, regulations killed those club goers.
According to your words, regulations killed those club goers.
yes, it required them to be defenseless. not that I expect you to see that.
yes, it required them to be defenseless. not that I expect you to see that.
But if chairs and frying pans and knives and pencils kill just like guns, as you claim, then the club goers weren't defenseless.
you have a flair for the hyperbolic
