The key word there, WAS, but it's difficult to know where he stands NOW, he opposes gay marriage, that is not too friendly.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/9827772.html.
The key word there, WAS, but it's difficult to know where he stands NOW, he opposes gay marriage, that is not too friendly.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/9827772.html.
You really have the talking points down don't you lol. Listen, they're going to try and kill us no matter what we call it. Enough of the playing heads games with them already. Some of these people are more than willing to come here and kill as many Americans as possible even if they die in the process. They do not care what we call it or don't call it.
So the Trumptards bleating about Obama's "refusal" is BS?
P.S. You forgot "narrative", social justice warrior" and "PC", lol.
You also didn't mention Hillary.
You really have the talking points down don't you lol.
Listen, they're going to try and kill us no matter what we call it. Enough of the playing heads games with them already. Some of these people are more than willing to come here and kill as many Americans as possible even if they die in the process.
They do not care what we call it or don't call it.
This is about national security and not politics. I'm not a hack, like you, lol.
The bolded had me literally break down in convulsive laughter.
The irony.
Whose talking points am I using?
I've been saying the same things about radical Islam for over a decade now. I wasn't here at the time, but I was all over Bush II for calling it the 'war on terror'.
Or do you think I picked the screen name 'Darth Omar' just to be cute? I added Hussein back when we weren't supposed to say Barack's middle name lol. I'll probably drop it when he's finally gone.
But if I have talking points, I've picked them up from my own study of radical Islam, which I started shortly after 9/11.
You on the other hand, have the liberal dogma don't pat.
