AP MSNBC secret superdelegate poll presumes HRC as nominee

anatta

100% recycled karma
Clinton's historic victory — its timing a surprise, only hours before voters head to the polls on the last multistate day of the Democratic primary — was immediately tempered by her opponent Bernie Sanders’ refusal to bow out of the race

the AP canvassed more undeclared superdelegates and enough came forward to publicly declare their support for Clinton Monday night ahead of voting Tuesday
++
It's a long story.. start with the horse race coverage, and the race to be first.

Add in the running dog press for Clinton (WaPo /MSNBC et all) and the undemocratic Democratic party and what do you get?

Voter suppression, disenfranchisement in CA..

Listening to various talking heads telling us why it must be so puts a new spin on spinning it
 
the super delegates don't give a fuck about the voters in California......
the superdelegates are the Democratic establishment... Bernie is taking the stage
Smiley31-1.gif


I'm going to miss inspiration as politics, as the slog till Nov takes the stage
 
toast can vote for trump :)

Trump needs to show some sanity first.. I'm sympathetic to limited government ( in terms of true federalism), getting out of the TPP
and I wouldn't have thrown the kitchen sink in for the Iran deal either -without some promises of halting Iranian hegemony.
Plus; Hilary is a despicable warmongering corporatist.

But this?? out right racism? He's essentially calling for religious test for office!! - that is NOT American values.

He would have to change his stripes for me to look at him again
 
Trump needs to show some sanity first.. I'm sympathetic to limited government ( in terms of true federalism), getting out of the TPP
and I wouldn't have thrown the kitchen sink in for the Iran deal either -without some promises of halting Iranian hegemony.
Plus; Hilary is a despicable warmongering corporatist.

But this?? out right racism? He's essentially calling for religious test for office!! - that is NOT American values.

He would have to change his stripes for me to look at him again

which one is the religous test? o.O
 
which one is the religous test? o.O
claiming his Mexican heritage inherently disqualifies him ( or causes him to be biased) in the court case against Trump

Article VI
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
 
“[Judge Curiel] is a member of a club or society, very strongly pro-Mexican, which is all fine,” Trump told CBS’s John Dickerson. “But I say he’s got bias.” The club Trump was referring to was La Raza Lawyers; an organization with the stated mission “to promote the interests of the Latino communities throughout the state.”

Translated, “la raza” means “the race.” Imagine the outcry if white attorneys from Mississippi, such as this author, started a a legal association called “The Race” with the stated mission to promote the interest of white, Southern communities. Hollywood stars and entertainers, such as Bryan Adams, would boycott the state in perpetuity

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi.../trumps-questioning-federal-judge-not-racist/
 
“[Judge Curiel] is a member of a club or society, very strongly pro-Mexican, which is all fine,” Trump told CBS’s John Dickerson. “But I say he’s got bias.” The club Trump was referring to was La Raza Lawyers; an organization with the stated mission “to promote the interests of the Latino communities throughout the state.”

Translated, “la raza” means “the race.” Imagine the outcry if white attorneys from Mississippi, such as this author, started a a legal association called “The Race” with the stated mission to promote the interest of white, Southern communities. Hollywood stars and entertainers, such as Bryan Adams, would boycott the state in perpetuity

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi.../trumps-questioning-federal-judge-not-racist/

Trump started saying that later, that was not his original reason, his original reason was simply because the judge was "Mexican".
 
face book is a trip:

Hillary Clinton wore a $12,495 Armani jacket during a speech about inequality
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/06/

"If Clinton has already won the nomination all her supporters can take the day off today and enjoy the spoils"


Toast don't vote!""

Bill Clinton: Sanders supporters 'will be toast’
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...nton-to-sanders-supporters-they-will-be-toast

Hillary's rich, she can wear whatever she wants, but when arguing about inequality and claiming you're the person who will do something about it because you understand what the struggling are going through it presents quite a different illusion.
 
Hillary's rich, she can wear whatever she wants, but when arguing about inequality and claiming you're the person who will do something about it because you understand what the struggling are going through it presents quite a different illusion.
well she needed an upgrade from the pantsuits, but the pantsuits would have been better here.
It's typical Clinton coopting Bernies ideas while giving Wall St speeches and such. she's a shape shifter
 
A卐卐HatZombie;1629861 said:
“[Judge Curiel] is a member of a club or society, very strongly pro-Mexican, which is all fine,” Trump told CBS’s John Dickerson. “But I say he’s got bias.” The club Trump was referring to was La Raza Lawyers; an organization with the stated mission “to promote the interests of the Latino communities throughout the state.” Translated, “la raza” means “the race.” Imagine the outcry if white attorneys from Mississippi, such as this author, started a a legal association called “The Race” with the stated mission to promote the interest of white, Southern communities. Hollywood stars and entertainers, such as Bryan Adams, would boycott the state in perpetuity

Think so?
 
claiming his Mexican heritage inherently disqualifies him ( or causes him to be biased) in the court case against Trump

Article VI
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

being Mexican is a religion now?.....
 
Trump started saying that later, that was not his original reason, his original reason was simply because the judge was "Mexican".

I wish you were around more.....there are so many people who's thoughts I cannot read.......your gift is a blessing.......
 
being Mexican is a religion now?.....
hard to say..it's never been litigated but it seems like a bedrock Constitutional principle not to be judged on whom you are rather then what you do.
it's certainly offensive.
The whole thing bores me. Trumps protestations and the left's bearing down on it, but it can't be lightly dismissed.
Of course this is only for fed'l office -assuming the 6th applies here.
 
Back
Top