Bizaar rants, personal feudes, and outright lies!
This is what makes up Dangerous Donald's foreign policy.
Hillary R. Clinton!
Question? How can a person....any person....who has yet to serve one day in the position he/she is a candidate....have a foreign policy that can be "criticized" unless of course....like a demokraut one assumes that TALKING is a form of action?
If you want to measure an actual record....measure for success those of Barry and Hillary in relation to "foreign affairs". Take Hillary...there has not been a major foreign affairs decision in the middle east that she has pushed for that has not ended in total disaster....both in the foreign nation and in the US.
First...she voted for and supported the war in Iraq. Next she was a strong advocate for "regime change" in Libya...then she supported arming the criminals in Syria....not to mention the boondoggle witnessed in Benghazi.
How about Barry Obama the Community Organizer? All his middle eastern and European decisions have been nothing but disasters as well. What I find strange is a man who supposedly won a Noble Peace Prize for respecting human dignity has been found guilty of nation building through supporting revolution and war. Not to mention the people he has openly abandoned in harms way that he had promised and "guaranteed" aid if the need ever arose.
Just point to any middle eastern country that he openly encouraged to have an "ARAB SPRING" for the sake of democracy. Take the millions of protesters in Iran in 2009 marching against that nations religious leaders that support Jihad.....during the time that "Mahmoud Ahamdinejad was (wink, wink) RE-ELECTED in a clear case of voting fraud...the movement was called "The Green Movement". What was Barry Obama's response when these Millions requested his support for democracy and freedom? "Its an internal affair not to be interfered with by America!". Thus he LEFT them to fend for themselves.
Next comes Syria...he turned his head again and refused to support those against another tyrannical dictator....he used none of the tools that were at his disposal at first.....Military or Diplomatic help, just like he refused to help the (wink, wink) freedom fighters in IRAN in 2009.
Next comes Libya....where he does the opposite where it is not called for in supporting many of the same thugs WITH US MILITARY AID..that were to eventually become Isis. The trouble here? That dictator had shown signs of actually helping his people by modernizing its economy to implementing many social reforms as Gaddafi had an actual record of working with the US after Reagan gave him an attitude adjustment in his living room with a smart bomb....he gave up all attempts of having Nukes.....and worst of all....Barry's actions have just about cut off a major portion of US energy supplies and gave direct access and control to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Then....take Egypt....another US ALLY that helped with the war on terror...a long time negotiator with the US.....MUBARAK....was actually dethroned with Barry's support for the Muslim Brotherhood...calling them FREEDOM FIGHTERS a record that is easily "quantifiable". Strange is it not...considering he refused to act in Iran against an administration that directly hates the US...but sided with the revolutionaries against a US ally in Egypt. Strange indeed.
Now consider his actions....or lack of actions in IRAQ...after that nation had been defeated. He has all but pulled defeat from the jaws of victory....allowing the Brotherhood and Iran the opportunity to take Iraq for themselves. Again...strange for a man that is supposed to be looking after the BEST INTERESTS of the UNITED STATES.
Now these are RECORDS that have a HISTORY ACTUAL to measure....not false personal opinions based upon political ignorance and personal bigotry....the actions those 2 have taken that is measurable for SUCCESS or FAILURE. What? Do you people think that history can be erased so easily or do you assume that people are just to stupid to check the facts against the "hypocritical" TALK?
