Sleazy Cosby to get his day in court

Darla said:
Drugging a woman and then "having sex with her" is rape. Is this really being questioned??? If I hung around here as much as I used to I'd develop my own rage problem and before you knew it I'd start sounding like anatta, a fate I don't wish on anyone. Certainly not on myself.

If you know Tom is visiting your town - warn the women.
Click to expand...

Good thing you don't read my Facebook page
 
christiefan915 said:
Yes some were under. Here's NY law: In New York State, a person who is under age 16 but older than 13 years old can consent to sex with a person who is no more than 4 years older; the crime of the 3rd degree rape only happens when a person over the age of 21 has sex with a person who is under seventeen years old or younger and that person can or may be punished with up to 4 years in prison. The younger the victim is, the more severe the punishment. Note that this mans if you are 13 years or younger, you cannot legally consent, regardless of whether the other person is the same age or not.

Andrea Costand's defense is that he drugged her and drugged people can't give informed consent. Cosby's defense is that the women didn't say no or some such thing. Cosby admitted drugging the women before the sex acts, what kind of freak does that? I'm sure he could have had "awake sex" with any women he wanted. In fact he told a fellow comedian who was just up and coming that once the guy got famous he'd get so many offers of sex that he'd need two d*cks.

Cosby's a sicko, a pervert and an adulterer.
Click to expand...

Why don't you list how many of these were supposedly under 18; because you keep throwing out comments and haven't back a single one of them up with information.
 
christiefan915 said:
Yes some were under. Here's NY law: In New York State, a person who is under age 16 but older than 13 years old can consent to sex with a person who is no more than 4 years older; the crime of the 3rd degree rape only happens when a person over the age of 21 has sex with a person who is under seventeen years old or younger and that person can or may be punished with up to 4 years in prison. The younger the victim is, the more severe the punishment. Note that this mans if you are 13 years or younger, you cannot legally consent, regardless of whether the other person is the same age or not.

Andrea Costand's defense is that he drugged her and drugged people can't give informed consent. Cosby's defense is that the women didn't say no or some such thing. Cosby admitted drugging the women before the sex acts, what kind of freak does that? I'm sure he could have had "awake sex" with any women he wanted. In fact he told a fellow comedian who was just up and coming that once the guy got famous he'd get so many offers of sex that he'd need two d*cks.

Cosby's a sicko, a pervert and an adulterer.
Click to expand...

There is no doubt that his real life persona bears little relationship to that of Dr. Huxtable, that much is sure. I can't find any mention of his having under age sex though, except for a vague reference on Wikipedia with no details, do you have any links? I am not really sure what qualifies as drugs, many of my circle of friends in the 70s took Qaaludes or Mandrax as they are known over here. They were as common as M&Ms back then. Their effect was not really any different to smoking dope so I'm not really sure why they are being singled out.

Don't get me wrong, it does look like he has some kind of case to answer but I am always wary of media witch hunts. We have had so many over here, the latest being the footballer Ched Evans who was sentenced to 5 years in prison. He lodged an appeal and won the right to a retrial. The media called him all sorts of names at the time and many women who sided with him were castigated by the usual suspects.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top