Trump to debate sanders!

CFM said:
If you embarrass him like I did, he'll quit responding to you and start thread banning you.
Click to expand...

lol

I have noticed his threads where he bans everyone and essentially carries on a conversation with himself. I would actually feel sorry for him if not for the fact he is such an asshole.
 
Dale said:
lol

I have noticed his threads where he bans everyone and essentially carries on a conversation with himself. I would actually feel sorry for him if not for the fact he is such an asshole.
Click to expand...

He posted one a few days ago that the thread ban list was 4 lines long. Don't remember the topic not that it matters.
 
Dale said:
As you like to say, reading is FUNdamental.

I did not say they only raised $1 million dollars. What I said was he contributed $1 million dollars personally, which is more money than either you or I will ever give to veterans. So for either of us to try and criticize him on that front would be pretty comical.
Click to expand...
He has the money to give, I would give a million too if I had it to give, he also gets to write it off!
 
CFM said:
He posted one a few days ago that the thread ban list was 4 lines long. Don't remember the topic not that it matters.
Click to expand...

Nobody wants a wanker like you in their thread. Members come here to debate politics, not endure the incessant drivel of a wanking coprologist.
 
Rana said:
He has the money to give, I would give a million too if I had it to give, he also gets to write it off!
Click to expand...

It's easy to say you would give money you don't have though.

My point was how ever you look at it - he raised millions of dollars for the Vets and that's a good thing, not bad.
 
Dale said:
It's easy to say you would give money you don't have.
Click to expand...

It's also easy to give money to make yourself look good for an election when you are a billionaire and know you get to write it off. The vet groups still wondering where all the money went that was raised in their name but never distributed. Isn't that illegal, it certainly is immoral.
 
Rana said:
He has the money to give, I would give a million too if I had it to give, he also gets to write it off!
Click to expand...

You would?

Easy to say. Since you don't have it, you can make yourself feel good knowing that you'll never have to do it. For a typical bleeding heart Liberal, the intention is the only thing that matters. I bet you believe it makes you a compassionate person to SAY you would do it?

IF you ever did it, are you claiming that you wouldn't take it as a write-off?
 
Trump vs sanders - no disagreement on trade or "coalitions" in foreign policy...

I think it would be enlightening for the public - cross party debate, and I think it would be interesting topics.
Get some focus on the 1%'s, etc...Sanders v. Clinton is kina the same watching her shape shift left.
 
Dale said:
It's easy to say you would give money you don't have though.

My point was how ever you look at it - he raised millions of dollars for the Vets and that's a good thing, not bad.
Click to expand...

That's the bleeding heart Liberal definition of compassion. It's how they view funding of social programs. They believe that supporting someone they think has too much money being taxed to fund programs they support is the same as them giving their own money they admit they don't have but would IF they did.
 
Rana said:
It's also easy to give money to make yourself look good for an election when you are a billionaire and know you get to write it off. The vet groups still wondering where all the money went that was raised in their name but never distributed. Isn't that illegal, it certainly is immoral.
Click to expand...

Difference is Trump gave it and you only SAY you would.
 
anatta said:
Trump vs sanders - no disagreement on trade or "coalitions" in foreign policy...

I think it would be enlightening for the public - cross party debate, and I think it would be interesting topics.
Get some focus on the 1%'s, etc...Sanders v. Clinton is kina the same watching her shape shift left.
Click to expand...

Does he have a name for Sanders, yet?
 
moon2012 said:
Nobody wants a wanker like you in their thread. Members come here to debate politics, not endure the incessant drivel of a wanking coprologist.
Click to expand...

I'm here responding to you and there isn't a damn thing your cowardly ass can do about it but whine.

You don't come here to debate. You consider everyone that disagrees with you a troll. Your words prove it.
 
Rana said:
It's also easy to give money to make yourself look good for an election when you are a billionaire and know you get to write it off. The vet groups still wondering where all the money went that was raised in their name but never distributed. Isn't that illegal, it certainly is immoral.
Click to expand...

I have noticed most of your arguments regarding Mr. Trump are emotional and usually involve assigning nefarious motives to what ever he does.

But regardless as to your own personal opinions as to why he raised the money - he has still raised millions of dollars for the vets and that's a good thing. The money is planned to be given out on memorial day to veteran groups. So that's why it hasn't been distributed yet. Why you think that is immoral I haven't a clue.
 
Rana said:
Does he have a name for Sanders, yet?
Click to expand...
"Crazy" Bernie as in "we love crazy Bernie"..which is another thing -the public might get past the 'socialist thing'
it would reach a larger audience//it's all good.I don't see any negatives.
 
CFM said:
That's the bleeding heart Liberal definition of compassion. It's how they view funding of social programs. They believe that supporting someone they think has too much money being taxed to fund programs they support is the same as them giving their own money they admit they don't have but would IF they did.
Click to expand...

Yeah it's very easy to be compassionate with other people's money. :)
 
Dale said:
I have noticed most of your arguments regarding Mr. Trump are emotional and usually involve assigning nefarious motives to what ever he does.

But regardless as to your own personal opinions as to why he raised the money - he has still raised millions of dollars for the vets and that's a good thing. The money is planned to be given out on memorial day to veteran groups. So that's why it hasn't been distributed yet. Why you think that is immoral I haven't a clue.
Click to expand...

She'll pucker up to whatever Hillary does.

Trump gave his own money and all Rana has is a CLAIM that she WOULD.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top