Sleazy Cosby to get his day in court

Celticguy said:
I recall when everybody loved him.
Then he alienated blacks by pointing out the nature of their woes. Then the left joined in. And so they looked for ways to punish him for being honest.
And here we are.
Click to expand...


I was not talking about the 1980's. I was talking about the 2000's when he was bad mouthing black people.
 
Jarod said:
I was not talking about the 1980's. I was talking about the 2000's when he was bad mouthing black people.
Click to expand...

From your upper class white liberal position was Cosby out of line speaking to people in his community that way?
 
Jarod said:
I don't remember exactly what he said so I cant answer.
Click to expand...

But you were willing to pull out the broad brush anyway. Hmmm

On essence he wanted kids to speak English, study hard in school and succeed in life. He's always been big on education and took the black community to task for failing to see that it's children avail themselves of the gift of education.

They didn't care for that.
 
Last edited:
Celticguy said:
But you were willing to pull out the broad brus anyway. Hmmm On essence he wanted kids to speak English, study hard in school and succeed in life. He's always been big on education and took the black community to task for failing to see that it's children avail themselves of the gift of education. They didn't care for that.
Click to expand...

You thought he was a "good Negro" until recently, didn't you?

Don't lie.
 
Milagro said:
There are several things that just don't sit right about this case. It was previously looked at in 2005 I believe and thrown out due to lack of evidence. In 2006 she received an undisclosed sum from Cosby. She also reputedly saw him several times after the alleged incident including going to Canada to see his stage show. Is that the behaviour of someone who was digitally penetrated or fingered to use the more common term, I would like to know? Call me old fashioned but I still believe in omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium. He may well be guilty but it just seems a little odd to me.
Click to expand...

He admitted in a 2005 deposition that he had sex with teens. His entire defense is that any sexual contact with others was consensual.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/24/bill-cosby-admitted-to-sex-with-teens-in-deposition/
 
Milagro said:
Whilst that might be considered sleazy, were any of teens under the age of consent? Andrea Constand was 31 in 2005.
Click to expand...

Yes some were under. Here's NY law: In New York State, a person who is under age 16 but older than 13 years old can consent to sex with a person who is no more than 4 years older; the crime of the 3rd degree rape only happens when a person over the age of 21 has sex with a person who is under seventeen years old or younger and that person can or may be punished with up to 4 years in prison. The younger the victim is, the more severe the punishment. Note that this mans if you are 13 years or younger, you cannot legally consent, regardless of whether the other person is the same age or not.

Andrea Costand's defense is that he drugged her and drugged people can't give informed consent. Cosby's defense is that the women didn't say no or some such thing. Cosby admitted drugging the women before the sex acts, what kind of freak does that? I'm sure he could have had "awake sex" with any women he wanted. In fact he told a fellow comedian who was just up and coming that once the guy got famous he'd get so many offers of sex that he'd need two d*cks.

Cosby's a sicko, a pervert and an adulterer.
 
Drugging a woman and then "having sex with her" is rape. Is this really being questioned??? If I hung around here as much as I used to I'd develop my own rage problem and before you knew it I'd start sounding like anatta, a fate I don't wish on anyone. Certainly not on myself.

If you know Tom is visiting your town - warn the women.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top