What if its not terrorism?

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
So, the Paris to Cairo flight that crashed has an unknown cause at this time, but Dangerous Donald went out last night screaming about how it was terrorism and basically calling anyone who thought otherwise stupid.

Now, I suspect from what we know that it was terrorism, but is it really the right thing to do to go off half cocked calling it terrorism before we have solid evidence of it?

The fact is that ISIS has always claimed responsibility for things they do within hours of the event, they have not done so with this jet. In fact nobody creditable has done so, and terrorists usually do, it furthers their cause to claim it. As the hours tick bye, the possibility grows that its not terrorism.

My question becomes, if its not terrorism, will that further HRC's argument that Dangerous Donald is a loose cannon?

Remember we invaded Iraq on such loose assumptions!
 
So, the Paris to Cairo flight that crashed has an unknown cause at this time, but Dangerous Donald went out last night screaming about how it was terrorism and basically calling anyone who thought otherwise stupid.

Now, I suspect from what we know that it was terrorism, but is it really the right thing to do to go off half cocked calling it terrorism before we have solid evidence of it?

The fact is that ISIS has always claimed responsibility for things they do within hours of the event, they have not done so with this jet. In fact nobody creditable has done so, and terrorists usually do, it furthers their cause to claim it. As the hours tick bye, the possibility grows that its not terrorism.

My question becomes, if its not terrorism, will that further HRC's argument that Dangerous Donald is a loose cannon?

Remember we invaded Iraq on such loose assumptions!

Hillary voted for the war.
 
Jarod don't care!

I do care, that is why I supported BHO over HRC and one of the reasons I supported Sanders over HRC.

Dangerous Donald supported the war also, now he lies and says he did not. I would prefer someone who owns up to her mistake to someone who simply lies about his mistake.
 
I do care, that is why I supported BHO over HRC and one of the reasons I supported Sanders over HRC. Dangerous Donald supported the war also, now he lies and says he did not. I would prefer someone who owns up to her mistake to someone who simply lies about his mistake.

What difference, at this point, does it make?
 
Does one require a reason to want terrorists neutralized ?
There is nothing wrong with being definitive. Nothing wrong with reiterating they will always be in the crosshairs. And every time they make an announcement us an opportunity to nail down how which makes the trail to them clearer (assuming you are looking).
BO preferred to treat these like spats between children which only ever allowed it to flourish.
Taking it seriously is what's needed.
 
So, the Paris to Cairo flight that crashed has an unknown cause at this time, but Dangerous Donald went out last night screaming about how it was terrorism and basically calling anyone who thought otherwise stupid.

Now, I suspect from what we know that it was terrorism, but is it really the right thing to do to go off half cocked calling it terrorism before we have solid evidence of it?

The fact is that ISIS has always claimed responsibility for things they do within hours of the event, they have not done so with this jet. In fact nobody creditable has done so, and terrorists usually do, it furthers their cause to claim it. As the hours tick bye, the possibility grows that its not terrorism.

My question becomes, if its not terrorism, will that further HRC's argument that Dangerous Donald is a loose cannon?

Remember we invaded Iraq on such loose assumptions!

Planes very rarely fall out of the sky especially when the weather is fine and clear. So it is either a suicide pilot or terrorism. I am putting my money on terrorism.
 
Maybe if Western nations stopped meddling in the affairs of sovereign nations in the Middle East and quit killing Arabs and Muslims from the air, terrorists would stick to fighting each other.
 
Planes very rarely fall out of the sky especially when the weather is fine and clear. So it is either a suicide pilot or terrorism. I am putting my money on terrorism.

It's sad that nobody in this thread has decried the terrible loss of life.

The really sad thing is that you weren't aboard.
 
did not Hillary call it terrorism later the same day? Being a professional politician
she probly said "it's most likely terrorism" always keeping that wiggle room ,but it's the same thing
 
His supporters don't care, Counselor.

You are wasting your time.

Exactly.....What? Are you lefty's suggesting that ISLE/ISIS should not have their little feelings hurt by a false accusation? Just exactly why does it matter if they are guilty or not....if they are not..BIG DEAL. Again....funny as hell...Concern over terrorists and their feelings...but this does not apply to your fellow US CITIZENS whom your guild falsely accuses on a daily basis.....THIS THREAD being the perfect example of POLITICAL HYPOCRISY.

Da poor little.....terrorists....cry us a river. :palm: Clearly TRUMP hates ISLAMIC TERRORISM..therefore he is not fit to lead the free world, we need a leader/coward with a history of Appeasement and Ass Kissing...that has resulted...in....err..err... more acts of terror. Go Figure.:) I say....give'em a pass....hell you've already bestowed constitutional rights upon acts of terror. Why not simply allow them to post bail and play the system the way you liberals have constructed it....to reward the wicked and punish the righteous? Why not make more law that punishes the law abiding in order to give the terrorists a pass?
 
Last edited:
did not Hillary call it terrorism later the same day? Being a professional politician she probly said "it's most likely terrorism" always keeping that wiggle room ,but it's the same thing

No, it is not. One is an opinion, the other isn't.
 
Back
Top