sweden proving to the world what cucks can do

Book Purist said:
Have you spoken to a non-racist Swede ever?
Click to expand...

So I take it from that non-answer that you've never spoken to any actual Swedes. It's easy to pontificate when you are thousands of miles away. I know several Swedes including an English friend that emigrated there over 30 years ago. Should I listen to him or American PC obsessed loonies that have never been there or indeed even spoken to any Swedes?
 
Milagro said:
So I take it from that non-answer that you've never spoken to any actual Swedes. It's easy to pontificate when you are thousands of miles away. I know several Swedes including an English friend that emigrated there over 30 years ago. Should I listen to him or American PC obsessed loonies that have never been there or indeed even spoken to any Swedes?
Click to expand...

Grow up and embrace the Internet. I already know more about UK politics than you do- and I'm not even concentrating.
 
Tell us again about the ' Corbyn disaster ' and the nice Jewish mayoral candidate who indulged in the worst Tory racist extremism since Enoch Powell.
 
moon2012 said:
Tell us again about the ' Corbyn disaster ' and the nice Jewish mayoral candidate who indulged in the worst Tory racist extremism since Enoch Powell.
Click to expand...

It is a disaster for Labour, they have absolutely no chance of forming a government without getting back the lost Scottish MP seats in Parliament. To call Zac Goldsmith racist is just fucking demented considering that his sister Jemima married Imran Khan and converted to Islam! Indeed it was Khan that encouraged him to go into politics.
 
Hello- where did Mr. Brit politics disappear to ? Must be lunchtime in Richmond Park.
 
moon2012 said:
Goldsmith's own sister said that she didn't even recognize him in his racist role. Thanks for bringing her up.



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ign-has-criticised-his-campaign-a7017801.html
Click to expand...

You are just being a lying cunt again, she never accused him of racism but of running a divisive campaign. So bloody what, Kahn has associated with some pretty obnoxious Islamic extremists. Of course it is pretty clear that you want Israelis to driven back to the sea and drowned as well.

The Tory candidate said it was “just weird” that Mr Khan spoke up for Yusuf al-Qaradawi — who reportedly supported Hamas suicide bombings — at a Commons committee meeting. And he claimed Mr Khan had spoken up for extremists who called for Jews to be driven into the sea. “It’s not flowery language — not if you are an Israeli Jew or a British Jew or a French Jew facing a frightening rise in anti-Semitism,” he said.

Labour MP Louise Ellman, who has warned against anti-Semitism being tolerated, condemned Dr Tamimi in a 2003 Parliament debate, saying: “He told a conference in Vienna that after Israel is destroyed and replaced with an Islamic state, the Jews should ‘sail on the sea in ships back to where they came or drown in it’.”

Mr Goldsmith insisted: “To be clear, I have never suggested he is an extremist but without a shadow of doubt he has given platform, oxygen and cover to people who are extremists. “He has said some great things in the last few months. He wants to be the Muslim to take the fight to extremists. Who can argue with that? But he cannot escape his record.”
Click to expand...

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/mayo...f-giving-platform-to-extremists-a3224246.html
 
Last edited:
Milagro said:
You are just being a lying cunt again, she never accused him of racism but of running a divisive campaign. So bloody what, Kahn has associated with some pretty obnoxious Islamic extremists. Of course it is pretty clear that you want Israelis to driven back to the sea and drowned as well.
Click to expand...

The lies are yours- evidently. My view on the legitimacy of the Israeli state has always been made clear. Of course, racist slander is what you and the likes of Goldsmith indulge in.
No joy here, boy- none with Kahn either.
 
moon2012 said:
The lies are yours- evidently. My view on the legitimacy of the Israeli state has always been made clear. Of course, racist slander is what you and the likes of Goldsmith indulge in.
No joy here, boy- none with Kahn either.
Click to expand...

Yes mate, I am sure that you agree with this guy that Israel has no right to exist. I mean let's be clear here, if by some miracle Israel was able to go back to the 1967 borders it wouldn't mean shit. Why were there 5 Arab nations poised in 1967 to eradicate Israel and annihilate it? Why would that be any different now with so many loony tunes hating Jews for just being Jews. If the Palestinians were so wonderful then why did Jordan kick them out in Black September? They didn't want them taken over their lands and fought a war to get rid of them. Israel has just 0.5% of the Middle East yet the Arabs would deny them that as well.
 
Milagro said:
What else do you imagine is going to happen when you have Muslim men coming from third world countries, where women are all covered up to somewhere like Sweden? It was so predictable but the Swedish government is incredibly stupid!!

Click to expand...
You mean they're like Gary Glitter?
 
Israel WILL go back to the PRE-1967 borders as a matter of world concern. That's Israel's LEGITIMATE boundary according to MODERN international agreement.
In FACT- Israel's only current LEGAL borders , as expressed by international lawyers, are those designated by UNGAR 181 of 1947. Personally, I agree with those experts and I don't doubt that the world will press for those borders if Israel doesn't accept the GIFT HORSE of the PRE-1967 borders which it is being offered. img]
So get back to where you belong, you disgusting and brutal ethnic cleansers, or lose everything you've gained through killing and theft since 1947.


230px-UN_Palestine_Partition_Versions_1947.jpg
 
Last edited:
moon2012 said:
Israel WILL go back to the PRE-1967 borders as a matter of world concern. That's Israel's LEGITIMATE boundary according to MODERN international agreement.
In FACT- Israel's only current LEGAL borders , as expressed by international lawyers, are those designated by UNGAR 181 of 1947. Personally, I agree with those experts and I don't doubt that the world will press for those borders if Israel doesn't accept the GIFT HORSE of the PRE-1967 borders which it is being offered. img]
So get back to where you belong, you disgusting and brutal ethnic cleansers, or lose everything you've gained through killing and theft since 1947.


230px-UN_Palestine_Partition_Versions_1947.jpg
Click to expand...

Ok sonny, dream on! Whilst you are about it, can you tell the USA to give back Hawaii, Russia to give back Crimea, Kaliningrad, South Ossetia, Transnistria, Abkhazia, Karelia and Pakistan to give back Lahore? Oh and don't forget Northern Cyprus (Turkey), Nagorno-Karabakh (Azerbaijan), Tibet (China).

What is far more likely to happen is that the Israeli settlements will become part of Israel proper and some 300,000 Israeli Arab citizens living in northern ‘Triangle’ would find themselves in a Palestinian state under a swap deal.
 
Last edited:
moon2012 said:
Israel WILL go back to the PRE-1967 borders as a matter of world concern. That's Israel's LEGITIMATE boundary according to MODERN international agreement.
In FACT- Israel's only current LEGAL borders , as expressed by international lawyers, are those designated by UNGAR 181 of 1947. Personally, I agree with those experts and I don't doubt that the world will press for those borders if Israel doesn't accept the GIFT HORSE of the PRE-1967 borders which it is being offered. img]
So get back to where you belong, you disgusting and brutal ethnic cleansers, or lose everything you've gained through killing and theft since 1947.


230px-UN_Palestine_Partition_Versions_1947.jpg
Click to expand...

fact the arab world tried twice to eradicate israel and failed :) Palestinians shouls go to them.
 
moon2012 said:
It won't stop there- and the methods are progressing. You're a fascism fan, circa 2016. You just haven't accepted that yet. The United Nations will outlive Israeli fascism.
Click to expand...

Yeh because they were so effective in Bosnia, Rwanda, Libya, Somalia, East Timor, the Congo and Sudan.
 
Plenty of success elsewhere, Tory arse-licker- and you're oblivious to the fact that the UN is the sum of its parts, including the UK's onerous part of it.


Israel and Palestine- courtesy of 'Great' Britain, 1947;

230px-UN_Palestine_Partition_Versions_1947.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top