Would Clinton - Sanders be unbeatable?

Jarod said:
I don't think any ticket is "unbeatable" but I think Clinton-Sanders would be a very powerful ticket.

The problems with it are:

1) I wonder if Sanders would go for it, in the end I think he would because he seems to be a very dedicated to his agenda and it would be a valuable platform to advance his life long work toward liberalizing our nation.

2) They are both older, and I suspect Clinton would like the optics of having a younger person on the stage with her, although Sanders really appeals to younger people.

3) They are both northeasterners, although Bill Clinton and Al Gore were both Southerners.


What are your thoughts about this ticket?
Click to expand...


They might win 57 states :eyeroll:
 
Jarod said:
I don't think any ticket is "unbeatable" but I think Clinton-Sanders would be a very powerful ticket.

The problems with it are:

1) I wonder if Sanders would go for it, in the end I think he would because he seems to be a very dedicated to his agenda and it would be a valuable platform to advance his life long work toward liberalizing our nation.

2) They are both older, and I suspect Clinton would like the optics of having a younger person on the stage with her, although Sanders really appeals to younger people.

3) They are both northeasterners, although Bill Clinton and Al Gore were both Southerners.


What are your thoughts about this ticket?
Click to expand...

You'd get the group that thinks having a vagina makes her qualified and the group that thinks they deserve whatever Bolshevik Bernie tells them someone else should fund for them.
 
Leonthecat said:
You are wrong, but keep thinking that, if it makes you feel better.
Click to expand...

Which one would get your vote. The one you think is qualified because she has a vagina or Bolshevik Bernie promising you something paid for by someone else, freeloader?
 
Leonthecat said:
They have much more in common than they have differences.
Bernie is much more pragmatic than you think he is. So is Warren.
Click to expand...

Bolshevik Bernie thinks it's OK to force someone that isn't a kid's parent to pay for something the kid's own parent won't do on his/her behalf. That's not pragmatic, that's foolish.
 
Jarod said:
I don't think any ticket is "unbeatable" but I think Clinton-Sanders would be a very powerful ticket.

The problems with it are:

1) I wonder if Sanders would go for it, in the end I think he would because he seems to be a very dedicated to his agenda and it would be a valuable platform to advance his life long work toward liberalizing our nation.

2) They are both older, and I suspect Clinton would like the optics of having a younger person on the stage with her, although Sanders really appeals to younger people.

3) They are both northeasterners, although Bill Clinton and Al Gore were both Southerners.


What are your thoughts about this ticket?
Click to expand...

1) Bolshevik Bernie's goal isn't to liberalize America, it's to create entitlement minded freeloaders.

2) One is much older than Reagan was and many that support him don't see that as an issue when their guy runs. Typical hypocrites.

3) Al Gore lost his home state when he FAILED in his run for President.
 
CFM said:
1) Bolshevik Bernie's goal isn't to liberalize America, it's to create entitlement minded freeloaders.

2) One is much older than Reagan was and many that support him don't see that as an issue when their guy runs. Typical hypocrites.

3) Al Gore lost his home state when he FAILED in his run for President.
Click to expand...

Much older? Really? 5 years?

HRC is younger than Trump and younger than Reagan was when he was inaugurated.
 
I think Sanders is looking at the end of his career, why not go out with a four year stint as VP.

Just having a Democratic Socialist as VP would help his cause.
 
Jarod said:
I think Sanders is looking at the end of his career, why not go out with a four year stint as VP.

Just having a Democratic Socialist as VP would help his cause.
Click to expand...

No, don't think so.
What will he do going to funerals and ribbon cuttings ?
Congress is a far better platform.
 
Jarod said:
I don't think any ticket is "unbeatable" but I think Clinton-Sanders would be a very powerful ticket.

The problems with it are:

1) I wonder if Sanders would go for it, in the end I think he would because he seems to be a very dedicated to his agenda and it would be a valuable platform to advance his life long work toward liberalizing our nation.

2) They are both older, and I suspect Clinton would like the optics of having a younger person on the stage with her, although Sanders really appeals to younger people.

3) They are both northeasterners, although Bill Clinton and Al Gore were both Southerners.


What are your thoughts about this ticket?
Click to expand...

A Criminal and a Communist? Every democrat in the nation would vote for that ticket. :) But sad to say....neither the Republicans or the Democrats hold a majority in this nation...its the INDEPENDENT moderates that swing the elections. It just depends.....who the best liar might be, Trump or Sir Hillary. But, I would have to vote for Sir Hillary...she's predictable and self serving...but on the other hand this nation cannot stand another 4 years of Megalomania induced Narcissism if TRUMP were to somehow win. Obamy has brought this nation to a tipping point and another "delusional" Power Mad narcissist would result in the final nail being driven into the coffin.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top