We have determined that this action is not based on principle but rather politics.
You have?
We have determined that this action is not based on principle but rather politics.
It does not make me feel any way... its a simple truth.
Sorry you have such self hatred that you cant even admit you are in anyway different than the average.
You sure sound like you are concerned about sexuality... its simply not a big deal in any way.
Maybe, in the case of the Saudi's bringing Westernization to the ME is the best thing to change their religious extremism whereas, since NC is already Westetnized we need to hit them where it hurts, in the pocketbook to make them see the errors of their way.We have determined that this action is not based on principle but rather politics.
Maybe, in the case of the Saudi's bringing Westernization to the ME is the best thing to change their religious extremism whereas, since NC is already Westetnized we need to hit them where it hurts, in the pocketbook to make them see the errors of their way.
You have?
That means you don't have principles. Principles are something you stand on all the time. Since you say you don't stand on what you call principles, you don't have any. Thanks for admitting it.
Tiny minds think tiny thoughts, you have a lot of tiny thoughts.So you use economics to show what you consider a social error? It doesn't change that freaks should use the restroom based on their birth certificate not on how they feel. Leave up to one freak to support another.
I guess you think certain people aren't entitled to legal representation, then. So much for the 6th Amendment.
Tiny minds think tiny thoughts, you have a lot of tiny thoughts.
Is it wrong to expect more from NC than Dubai?
If you do the wrong thing once, can you not later do the right thing?
Nothing wrong with protecting religious liberties. That is the foundation of this country. It was religious people escaping persecution. Not queers
Nothing wrong with protecting religious liberties. That is the foundation of this country. It was religious people escaping persecution. Not queers
It was humans escaping persecution, it translates further than just religious persecution.
Telling someone no who expects only the answer of yes when they make a request isn't persecuting them.
True, but the government denying someone something you offer to others without a rational basis for the denial is.
Depends on how you define rational basis.
The government does that on all sorts of things for which you Liberals justify.
Its true, and things for which Conservatives justify, determining rational basis comes down to the opinion of the Supreme Court.
We've seen lately that the Supreme Court has missed on many of those opinions.