Angry Republican Pervos

zappasguitar

Well-known member
Dirty Old Men of Faux news are angry they can't just touch any woman they want anymore...


Fox hosts lose it over having to ask permission to touch women: ‘Yes means yes’ is ‘insane’



Fox Business host Stuart Varney on Thursday blasted what he called the “Yes Means Yes movement,” because it meant that men could be accused of assault if they touched women without permission.

Earlier this week, one of Harvard’s oldest and secretive all-male clubs issued a statement arguing that women should not be admitted because it increased the risk that male members could be accused of sexual assault.

“Forcing single gender organizations to accept members of the opposite sex could potentially increase, not decrease the potential for sexual misconduct.” Porcellian Club Graduate Board President Charles M. Storey said in the statement.

On his Thursday Fox Business show, Varney sided with the 225-year-old club.

“They are faced with the possibility of admitting women or are forced to admit women then they are therefore increasing the likelihood of a lawsuit,” the host opined. “Because if a man in this day in age holds the hand of a woman on a date without first asking permission, that is an assault. In come the lawyers.”

“The real story here now is, the law is now controlling intimate relationships between men and women,” Varney complained. “Lawyers [and] the law should not be in the middle of an intimate dating relationship between the sexes.”

The host ranted that the “no means no” rule had morphed into what he called the “Yes Means Yes movement,” which requires women give permission before men can touch them.

“The young lady must be asked, may I hold your hand. Failure to ask that question where she says yes is an assault!” Varney exclaimed, slapping his desk in disgust.

“That is insane,” Fox legal analyst Andrew Napolitano agreed. “Not every un-consented to touching is any of the business of the government.”

“Yes!” Varney concluded.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/04/fox...ssion-to-touch-women-yes-means-yes-is-insane/
 
Hopefully we can create a new cottage industry of prisons where we can lock up thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of horny college males who have the audacity to try and hold a woman's hand. About time we taught these punk college boys a lesson.
 
Corey Lewandowski is the poster child for angry conservative men who think it's OK to manhandle women with impunity, isn't he?
 
Hopefully we can create a new cottage industry of prisons where we can lock up thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of horny college males who have the audacity to try and hold a woman's hand. About time we taught these punk college boys a lesson.

Reasonable people...people with a modicum of common sense, understand this isn't about a man trying to hold a woman's hand.

But you go right on playing the disingenuous Rightie.
 
Reasonable people...people with a modicum of common sense, understand this isn't about a man trying to hold a woman's hand.

But you go right on playing the disingenuous Rightie.

What does being a rightie or leftie have to do with this?

Guys are getting kicked out of college for accusations of sexual misconduct, not proof and evidence and a chance to defend themselves, accusations. I completely understand why the Harvard club made the statement they did. I understand why the commentators made the comments they did as well.
 
Meanwhile in the real world, the husband of the democrats choice to be president is a known rapist and sexually deviant....
 
What does being a rightie or leftie have to do with this?

Guys are getting kicked out of college for accusations of sexual misconduct, not proof and evidence and a chance to defend themselves, accusations. I completely understand why the Harvard club made the statement they did. I understand why the commentators made the comments they did as well.

You sound just like those two disingenuous Righties from Faux News, Stuart Varney and Andrew Napolitano, with their ridiculous "ask before holding hands" nonsense.

They, and you, are trying to "pooh pooh" this by making it about "holding hands".
 
You sound just like those two disingenuous Righties from Faux News, Stuart Varney and Andrew Napolitano, with their ridiculous "ask before holding hands" nonsense.

They, and you, are trying to "pooh pooh" this by making it about "holding hands".

You think getting kicked out of college for sexual assault accusations when you don't have a right to defend yourself is not a big deal? Because that's the genesis of this issue. You don't like the analogy they used but you won't address the real issue.
 
Meanwhile in the real world, the husband of the democrats choice to be president is a known rapist and sexually deviant....

BJ was convicted of rape? When?

What sexual deviance?

What does that have to do with this issue?

I'll understand if you can't explain.
 
You sound just like those two disingenuous Righties from Faux News, Stuart Varney and Andrew Napolitano, with their ridiculous "ask before holding hands" nonsense.

They, and you, are trying to "pooh pooh" this by making it about "holding hands".

this shows how incredibly moronic you are because Napolitano is anything but a rightie or a leftie. but then again, I notice the labels you put upon people can change on a topical basis along your viewpoints.
 
You sound just like those two disingenuous Righties from Faux News, Stuart Varney and Andrew Napolitano, with their ridiculous "ask before holding hands" nonsense.

They, and you, are trying to "pooh pooh" this by making it about "holding hands".

For a tortuous battery to occur, the requisite intent is merely to touch or make contact without consent. It need not be an intention to do wrong and the wrongdoer need not intend to cause the particular harm that occurs. Non-consensual touching is all that is required.

Have someone explain it to you.
 
When did holding hands become perverted?

Also, not all consent need be said aloud.

This is another Zappas thread that fails because he constantly posts garbage from rawstory.
 
so he says. feel free to read his articles or watch his commentaries on how many times he goes after GW, or any other right wing politician.....just as often as he will a left winger. he isn't about political parties, he's about the constitution.

Someone who found fault with junior can't be a right winger?
That's truly funny.
 
What does being a rightie or leftie have to do with this?

Guys are getting kicked out of college for accusations of sexual misconduct, not proof and evidence and a chance to defend themselves, accusations. I completely understand why the Harvard club made the statement they did. I understand why the commentators made the comments they did as well.

I would like some of these males to try holding one of your male friends hand without permission or warning when you are out for a night on the town and see how it ends up.

Let them have their 225 year old male's only bonding club, I don't see how this hurts women. Women should form their own girls only, because women like their time to bond as well without men always hitting on them.

There are some things that are just steeped in tradition and this is one of them and also developing social skills.

Guys need a time, women free, where they can fart, scratch their sweaty balls, talk about sports, and women. It is rite of passage and I think we need those. I would hope that some sociologist at Harvard would tell them that.

Women need time to do female things, to talk about female things and how stupid men are, too.

I think it is okay for college kids to have their clubs.

I am sorry that the Harvard Club had to take the route that they did, blame the women.
 
Back
Top