There is nothing wrong with saying "black on black crime".

Granule said:
LOL, you squirrely bitch.

Show ME any posts on these threads where I said that YOU said Ray Lewis didn't have the right to talk.

What I'm trying to say here, communist #915, is that in one thread you bark about how no one should be calling black on black crime what it really is: black on black crime. So when I pull up an article with a black man talking about black on black crime, you immediately jump into discredit mode. What the fuck are you trying to pull when you do something like that?

There is no irony in my views on black people. I'll bet you the cost of 20 of your favorite abortion clinics that I'm more interested in seeing black people succeed, honestly, in this country than you are.
Click to expand...

Right here, dopey. "That he should've checked with you first before he spoke about black on black crime?"

Your posts prove the opposite of your words here. You completely ignored what the writer in my thread was trying to say and immediately jumped into attack mode about black on black crime. When have you ever spoken about white crime in our society without adding the "yes, but black on black, blah blah blah." My author was talking about terminology and how it sways public opinion but apparently you're too dense to see that.

It's clear to me that you and your pals hate and fear blacks. You have a far greater chance of being victimized by a white person than by a black but you prefer to ignore those statistics in favor of pushing your agenda. Your last sentence is an example and you're too dumb to realize it. "I'm more interested in seeing black people succeed, honestly, in this country.." "Honestly", really? Is your implication that most successful blacks got that way dishonestly?
 
Granule said:
So when you basically tell the entire universe to stfu about black on black crime, you of course didn't mean it literally, because you recognize we all, including Ray Lewis, have freedom of speech, right?
Click to expand...

You're hopeless. Go back to the article and fire up what little reading comprehension you have, then get back to me.
 
christiefan915 said:
Lol. They had a bad year so my liberal bleeding heart will give them a break until next season.
Click to expand...
that's right! and the Steelers went deep into the playoffs.. Clearly the football gods have not been paying attention. I'll have to get Ray to get in touch...
 
christiefan915 said:
Right here, dopey. "That he should've checked with you first before he spoke about black on black crime?"
Click to expand...
That was a question, you silly bitch. A question that still hasn't been answered honestly.

christiefan915 said:
Your posts prove the opposite of your words here. You completely ignored what the writer in my thread was trying to say and immediately jumped into attack mode about black on black crime.
Click to expand...
What, exactly, do you think the writer was trying to say? Because it looked to me like the childish rantings of a bossy liberal.

christiefan915 said:
When have you ever spoken about white crime in our society without adding the "yes, but black on black, blah blah blah."
Click to expand...
Check my related threads/comments, sweetheart. They're ALWAYS aimed at either wrong behaviors, or the Left. Skin tone is not the focus.

christiefan915 said:
My author was talking about terminology and how it sways public opinion but apparently you're too dense to see that.
Click to expand...
Your author was stamping its feet like a diapered occupier.

christiefan915 said:
It's clear to me that you and your pals hate and fear blacks.
Click to expand...
Correction. I have a fear of any small to large group of males that look less than reputable. Grubby appearances and excessive noise is always unsettling.

christiefan915 said:
You have a far greater chance of being victimized by a white person than by a black but you prefer to ignore those statistics in favor of pushing your agenda.
Click to expand...
Your strokes are too broad. Truth is, I have a far greater chance of being victimized by a white person ONLY if whites are the majority in the given geographical area that I'm currently in. My car was burgled twice in this county, and I'll bet you anything that the thief/thieves were white. There is no agenda here.

christiefan915 said:
Your last sentence is an example and you're too dumb to realize it. "I'm more interested in seeing black people succeed, honestly, in this country.." "Honestly", really? Is your implication that most successful blacks got that way dishonestly?
Click to expand...
Nope. But thanks for race hustling. My stance is that I'm opposed to ALL liars, cheats, murderers, terrorists, perverts, goat worshippers, leftists etc....
 
Last edited:
christiefan915 said:
You're hopeless. Go back to the article and fire up what little reading comprehension you have, then get back to me.
Click to expand...
OK, I think I got it. You're trying to say that the article is some kind of parody; that you and the author are just kidding and that you're perfectly cool with me, Ray, or anyone else referring to it as black on black crime. Is that right?
 
cawacko said:
If you read the thread you'll see I made a couple dozen posts on the issue and I don't think any of them suggest me saying it's total bullshit.

Do you not think there is any irony in Lewis' comments?
Click to expand...
I think Lewis has a valid point. I think the article's author is barking at the wind.
 
Granule said:
I think Lewis has a valid point. I think the article's author is barking at the wind.
Click to expand...

I agree with you he has a valid point.

The analogy I would use is this, Hillary Clinton has said all rape victims should be heard. We all know however based on her actions she means all victims except ones who have accused her husband. We know the irony in her statement. It doesn't mean she can't say all rape victims should be believed and it doesn't mean she isn't making a valid point.

I think it's great Lewis has stepped up here and spoken publically. But agreeing with him doesn't change the irony of him making the statement.

I also think Shaun King, the author, is often full of shit
 
I think comparing analogies is giving CCF's bullshit thread WAY too much consideration. What's most important to remember here, is that the Left is full of shit.
 
christiefan915 said:
The irony of Ray Lewis thinking he's a victim is just priceless.

June 1, 2000 — Day 7: Police officers testify that Lewis’s original police statement on Jan. 31 was riddled with lies. Lewis at first denied knowing the names of the people in his limo. He then later identified some of the people in the car, including Oakley (who he called “A.J. Johnson,” an alias). He also originally denied knowing somebody’s head had been cut but later said Oakley “had his head busted.” Lewis refused to sign the statement, saying he had to leave for the Pro Bowl in Hawaii and would answer questions later.

June 5, 2000 — Lewis agrees to a plea bargain — his murder and aggravated assault charges are dropped in exchange for his testimony against Sweeting and Oakley. As part of the deal, he also pleads guilty to obstruction of justice (for telling people in his limo to keep quiet) and receives a year of probation.
Click to expand...

I noticed you banned me on your thread about this topic. Can't ban me here.

I'll say whatever I want to say and if you don't like it, you can go fuck yourself. While you're at it, wash the sand out of your vagina. It's rubbing you the wrong way.

Also, you used daily kos as your source then talk about other outlets pushing agendas. How funny and sad at the same time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top