There's your proof!! I will enjoy you attempting to wriggle out of that!!
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/11/us/how-johnson-won-election-he-d-lost.html
And yet, you have no trouble with the other lies that resulted in conflicts, lol, I don't understand this type of convoluted thinking.
This is what I'm thinking. I think Hillary will make a better status quo president, she has the experience etc., but I'm beginning to think we need someone to shake the status quo and crush it. Hillary won't do that.
one of the few times I'll agree with you. I don't think you'd see the level of civil disobedience that occurred in 68 but it will happen. Then you will see a realignment in both parties political coalitions as occurred to both parties after 68.I might do that just for spite....if the Republican elite do to the voters what the Democrats did to their voters in '68 and seem to be doing now
....I just might, even if I'm not a big fan of Trump.....
this here folks is an example circular reasoning logical fallacy.To not vote is stupid
A vote for Trump is stupid
Therefore not voting is a vote for Trump.
cause, ironically, she's the only one on either side that actually has some balls.Why is Hillary better than Trump?
that remains to be seen.Not sure he would hang around for two either but the system would benefit greatly from this seismic a shift.
No that was W.I thought Obama was the messiah?![]()
technically speaking he didn't. The Nazi's ended democratic government after Hitler ascended to the Chancellory after Hindenbergs death.Nobody ever thought Hitler would have a second term either.
Why is Hillary better than Trump?
True. Many business elites find that out when they run for office.Governance is not a business. Different skill-set and very different goals. Ask Hoover.
Only if he's elected.Trump changes the paradigm for both parties.
They can't ignore the people any more.
he will never be president
you rcists don't have enough votes on your side
go get your proof asshole
Only if he's elected.
Well, I can't deny I believed the Clinton admin ranting and raving about Saddam and WMD for all those years, which carried on to Bush saying the SAME EXACT THING....so
I can't bitch about lies....I'd rather think they ALL BELIEVED Saddam had those WMD's and were simply wrong....because those are the facts and undeniable history.
you need to talk with more women then. A Trump or Cruz nomination would make the odds of a Demcrat winning very high. If you combined both Trumps and Cruz coalitions together they represent less than 25% of the general electorate.I thought that at first now I think the parties response has woken the beast.
No it isn't. Speaking as someone who was right about it.The really maddening thing is we can't know that he didn't have them. We only know that we couldn't find any; and it's hard to imagine so many people being wrong about it.
But it's history now.