cawacko
Well-known member
It's not just white mom's fretting about their kid's future.
Don't buy the spin.
I'm looking at the numbers not the spin. Hispanics HATE Trump and blacks don't like him either. Those are facts.
It's not just white mom's fretting about their kid's future.
Don't buy the spin.
I'm looking at the numbers not the spin. Hispanics HATE Trump and blacks don't like him either. Those are facts.
In Florida, Trump won nearly 3 in 10 Hispanics...against a pair of supposedly-Hispanic opponents, according to the exit polls.
http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2016-03-15/exit-poll-gop-unhappy-dems-ok-with-sanders-clinton
That's really not saying much. He's at 30% in a GOP primary in a state that he trounced in. A general election will be a significantly different story.
""Healy is part of a wave of Latinos getting their US citizenship for the express purpose of voting against Mr. Trump. Overall naturalizations typically rise in election years, but in 2016 the numbers are stark: Applications could approach 1 million this year, 20 percent higher than average, according to The New York Times.""
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politi...a-primary-day-clues-to-power-of-Hispanic-vote
Why move? I love it here. I just wish we weren't setting ourselves up for failure.
And quit it w/ the "failed ideas." Both sides have had whoppers. The Dems get most of the credit for the $19 trillion debt - which will undermine just about everything you believe in, btw.
Perhaps, but that's a pretty strong showing in a demographic that some say he had almost no support in - and he was running against 2 putative Hispanics.
Remember Romney's Hispanic percentage?
Reality much?
Not.
I wouldn't call it a strong showing at all. Rubio, who Trump beat soundly in FL, won the Latino vote 2-1. People also made a big deal about Nevada - but he won only 7% of Latinos who caucused there. By contrast, Hillary won 70% of the Latino vote in FL. A recent poll found an 80% disapproval for Trump among Latinos. That's not going to be a good demographic for him in November.
I do. Both parties bear responsibility, but Democrats have controlled Congress (and the purse strings) for most of the past 5-6 decades. I also believe that Dem policies have hurt small businesses and helped contribute to jobs moving abroad, among other ramifications. Dems are certainly responsible for most of the entitlements that take up ever-increasing segments of the budget.
Reality much?
Not.
Holy shit.
I thought I was the one smoking the good shit.
What's wrong with Merrick? He's hardly a flaming liberal or any kind of ideologue and hardly a bought and paid for corporatist?
Reality much?
Not.
from memory alone;
All presidents combined until Reagan,
Less than a trillion
Reagan and Bush I
4 Trillion
Clinton balances budget.
Bush II 12 TRILLION
Obama, reducing deficit spending.
I don't think you're capable of an intelligent counterpoint. These posts from you are useless.
You're a real hack, Rune.
Some things are so obvious they don't deserve rebutal
but go ahead Onceler band wagon with your buddies if it helps you get through.
Some things are so obvious they don't deserve rebutal
but go ahead Onceler band wagon with your buddies if it helps you get through.