Obama's MidEast Legacy

Good! you are getting a clues!
++
Sarkozy had his own motivations for France: what was the motivation for the USA to join in a "no Fly?"
It wasn't "humanitarian war" - that was but one excuse sold by the NTC's Jibril to Clinton in Paris
Supposedly Qaddafi was ready to decimate civilians in Bengazi - in fact he offered safe passage for civilians
as well as the NTC if they laid down their arms.

Clinton bought in to this, and refused to take Qaddafi's son phone call offering a negotiated settlement
AFTER she convinced Obama to go all in on bombing Qaddafi ( surpassing a "no fly" UN Resolution to "protect civilians")..

There is more -but you'd have to read the NYTimes piece (at least)..until you can connect the dots you are simply
sputtering out random talking points.
++

No there was nothing about Rothschilds banks about any of this. Qaddafi was a threat to French interests ..pure and simple
The whole shooting match was a pack of lies and 1/2 truths cobbled together..
My personal opinion was it was a reaction by Obama to his absence of condemning the Green Revolution's travestys
by the Iranians.. but that is simply my opinion,,nothing to back that up.
Idiot.
It is always about Rothschild banks.
Stuff your ignorance up your ass.
 
and you claim that document proves what?

And you didn't even read it, did you; you dumb fuck.
You ask for information, then you discard it, and want someone to explain it to you.

Just curious; but how many illegal substance overdoses have you survived?
 
Idiot.
It is always about Rothschild banks.
Stuff your ignorance up your ass.

The renegotiation of the oil contracts (nationalization)? ..anything is possible. but there is absolutely no documentation-
like the Emails provide.
Libyan national (central) bank was established by the rebels - but that was because Libya no longer was socialist.

The NTC bought into "democracy" in return for weapons ( the US did sell weapons - if you bother to read the NYTimes exclusive)
and for international recognition.

But that fails to take into account that Qaddafi was a "dictator", and he was impossible to replace.
It's a far fetched theory -much like "blood for oil" in Iraq.

Libya had no democratic government institutions -it was run pretty much as a fiefdom.
That's why the Libyan central bank was established. not some crazy conspiracy theory about .....(?)

well why don't you finish it out? You are the one making the claim as to why "Rothschild banks" caused the war..
for once see if you can construct an argument, instead of your doggish iterations.
 
The renegotiation of the oil contracts (nationalization)? ..anything is possible. but there is absolutely no documentation-
like the Emails provide.
Libyan national (central) bank was established by the rebels - but that was because Libya no longer was socialist.

The NTC bought into "democracy" in return for weapons ( the US did sell weapons - if you bother to read the NYTimes exclusive)
and for international recognition.

But that fails to take into account that Qaddafi was a "dictator", and he was impossible to replace.
It's a far fetched theory -much like "blood for oil" in Iraq.

Libya had no democratic government institutions -it was run pretty much as a fiefdom.
That's why the Libyan central bank was established. not some crazy conspiracy theory about .....(?)

well why don't you finish it out? You are the one making the claim as to why "Rothschild banks" caused the war..
for once see if you can construct an argument, instead of your doggish iterations.

Other than to point out that the US is largest arms dealer in the world (I don't need to read an article to know that)
I am going to ask you to read the 3rd line in my last quoted reply to you.

One bit of advice before you go; ask BAC to explain how central banks work. He understood.
You are clueless.
You support Saudi Arabia, perhaps our worst enemy.
You support active engagement of US military in the ME.
You don't even know who the players are or why and when it is painstakingly explained you deny it based on lack of e-mail evidence?

Well fucktard, not everything is discussed via e-mail.

Further, guess what Zipperhead!

Hilaray's private server was never hacked yet State's was.

Not only did she do nothing illegal but she protected the info better than State.

Fucking.......fool.
 
And you didn't even read it, did you; you dumb fuck.
You ask for information, then you discard it, and want someone to explain it to you.

Just curious; but how many illegal substance overdoses have you survived?

what do you think it proves penisrider
 
Other than to point out that the US is largest arms dealer in the world (I don't need to read an article to know that)
I am going to ask you to read the 3rd line in my last quoted reply to you.

One bit of advice before you go; ask BAC to explain how central banks work. He understood.
You are clueless.
You support Saudi Arabia, perhaps our worst enemy.
You support active engagement of US military in the ME.
You don't even know who the players are or why and when it is painstakingly explained you deny it based on lack of e-mail evidence?

Well fucktard, not everything is discussed via e-mail.

Further, guess what Zipperhead!

Hilaray's private server was never hacked yet State's was.

Not only did she do nothing illegal but she protected the info better than State.

Fucking.......fool.

idiotic screed. which State dept account was hacked? ??
Not the classified system you freaking lack of detailed moronic waste of oxygen retard;
do you realize their are 2 levels, and the classified account was never hacked *duh*

Hillary logs don't show hacking, but that is only part of it - the bottom is we don't know. Claims other wise are ignorant

Just like you don't know anything but to parrot BAC's claims of "Rothchild's bank"
It's possible, but we have DOCUMENTATION other wise.
And you can't even make a decent claim. :palm:

You are one sorry assed bunch of keystrokes ever to wander across the digital highway.
Utterly without a clue.

Are you really saying Saudi Arabia is our enemy?? Why did we just sell record arms to them?
Engagement isn't war you pinhead - engagement brings US stability ( when we don't do stupid wars like Iraq/Libya).
When we disengage either Russia steps in -who has no interest in the region except for Russian gains ( Like the Ukraine)
or the regional powers start going at each other.

Obama and Bush idiocy aside; that is the lessons of 50 years of US "engagement" in the Mideast.

Congrats;
you utterly fail each and every task given to you - you can't even make your own claims into a coherent case. chowder head.
 
idiotic screed. which State dept account was hacked? ??
Not the classified system you freaking lack of detailed moronic waste of oxygen retard;
do you realize their are 2 levels, and the classified account was never hacked *duh*

Hillary logs don't show hacking, but that is only part of it - the bottom is we don't know. Claims other wise are ignorant

Just like you don't know anything but to parrot BAC's claims of "Rothchild's bank"
It's possible, but we have DOCUMENTATION other wise.
And you can't even make a decent claim. :palm:

You are one sorry assed bunch of keystrokes ever to wander across the digital highway.
Utterly without a clue.

Are you really saying Saudi Arabia is our enemy?? Why did we just sell record arms to them?
Engagement isn't war you pinhead - engagement brings US stability ( when we don't do stupid wars like Iraq/Libya).
When we disengage either Russia steps in -who has no interest in the region except for Russian gains ( Like the Ukraine)
or the regional powers start going at each other.

Obama and Bush idiocy aside; that is the lessons of 50 years of US "engagement" in the Mideast.

Congrats;
you utterly fail each and every task given to you - you can't even make your own claims into a coherent case. chowder head.

Justice announced Hilary's server was never hacked idiot.
Further, every preceding Sect. /State also used private accounts.
Also there were no classified emails, only some were retroactively classified.
Upshot; Gowdy is a loser who tried to make a false case by lying.
You fell for his lies hook line and sinker because you are a simple minded woman hater.

Finaly loser, the Russians can have it if they want to waste theur childrens lives and what is left if theur treasure. Fucking warmongering freak.
Lets send your children to needlessly die there. Idiot.

PS yes you fuckung moron S.A. is undeed our enemy.
Bush and Shrub are both traitors
AND retard, we sell weapins to the highest bidder.
It us our business. We are the biggest arms manufacturer and dealer in the world.
We sold Saddam the gases ge used on the Kurds.
You fucking ignorant child.

Also, highly suggest you read "Blood Oil and Sand; the hidden history of the US war on Iraq" by Pearson if you really think blood for oil is a myth. What a fucking ignorant little child you are. So self righteous, selfserving
So incorrect.
 
Last edited:
Justice announced Hilary's server was never hacked idiot.
Further, every preceding Sect. /State also used private accounts.
Also there were no classified emails, only some were retroactively classified.
Upshot; Gowdy is a loser who tried to make a false case by lying.
You fell for his lies hook line and sinker because you are a simple minded woman hater.

Finaly loser, the Russians can have it if they want to waste theur childrens lives and what is left if theur treasure. Fucking warmongering freak.
Lets send your children to needlessly die there. Idiot.
nope. DoJ announced their was no evidence of hacking by the user logs.
It doesn't preclude other users -which is looking more common -from sharing passwords.
Where that goes is unknown -how about waiting for the FBI?

Every sec of state HAD a private account - every sec of state did NOT have an exclusive private server.

No "documented" classifications -obviously you fail to understand that the retro-classified materials - in some cases are so called "born classified."
I'd define that for you, but you are not worth the keystrokes -look it up. without a doubt top secret ( sources and methods) were on her server

ROFL. more worthless ad homs from Rune. You know I supported Hillary in '08 - how does than make me a woman hater?
Maybe because I lothe her performance as Sec. of State. I despise the Clintonian arrogance of power -
that is manifest in even setting up her server -which she has said was wrong.

Mostly I decry her lack of judgement, there and in every decision she made as sec of State -has nothing with her being a woman either way.
Only a demographic goofball Democrat like yourself would make such specious claims.

Russia is imperialistic. They are setting themselves up for empire. China is much the same but mixes in "soft power"
China is claiming the South China Sea -are you OK with that too? Simple minded fool.
 
nope. DoJ announced their was no evidence of hacking by the user logs.
It doesn't preclude other users -which is looking more common -from sharing passwords.
Where that goes is unknown -how about waiting for the FBI?

Every sec of state HAD a private account - every sec of state did NOT have an exclusive private server.

No "documented" classifications -obviously you fail to understand that the retro-classified materials - in some cases are so called "born classified."
I'd define that for you, but you are not worth the keystrokes -look it up. without a doubt top secret ( sources and methods) were on her server

ROFL. more worthless ad homs from Rune. You know I supported Hillary in '08 - how does than make me a woman hater?
Maybe because I lothe her performance as Sec. of State. I despise the Clintonian arrogance of power -
that is manifest in even setting up her server -which she has said was wrong.

Mostly I decry her lack of judgement, there and in every decision she made as sec of State -has nothing with her being a woman either way.
Only a demographic goofball Democrat like yourself would make such specious claims.

Russia is imperialistic. They are setting themselves up for empire. China is much the same but mixes in "soft power"
China is claiming the South China Sea -are you OK with that too? Simple minded fool.

I sure the fuck am.
Do you really suggest we go to war with China over a sand dot? Fucking fool.

D.oJ. was very clear Hil's server was not hacked.
There is no dispute.

Further there were no classified docs.
Again, these are facts beyond dispute.
Also beyond dispute: State was hacked.
It isn't just about classified or not either dickless wonder.
Hilary (and Bill)
were persecuted for 8 fucking years and left 25 million in debt by ONE (1) "judge" who had since admitted he was wrong and apoligized.

Hilary had damned good justification and her instincts were correct; State was hacked.

By the way, foolish little boy,
the US is also imperialistic.

Goddamn is there anything you are aware of?
 
Russia is imperialistic. They are setting themselves up for empire.

I disagree. The Russians had an ' agreement ' with the US that NATO would never attempt to encroach upon previously-Soviet buffer states after Gorbochev relaxed Russian control. NATO has broken that understanding.
The Russians had no option but to defend South Ossetia from Georgian aggression and almost the entire population of Crimea voted for renewed union with Russia. Crimea was always Russian until a drunken Kruschev- himself a Ukrainian- turned an unwilling Crimea over to Ukraine without even so much as a quorum at the Supreme Soviet. Eastern Ukrainians also want union with Russia but Putin has refused to comply for the sake of legality.
Russia was Syria's ally prior to the ' Arab Spring ' subversion by Israel and ' the West ' and Syria is Russia's only warm-water port. Even so, the Russians withdrew from Syria in order to allow events to take their natural course and has only recently intervened because the entire Western-orchestrated and illegal regime-change plan has become a giant clusterfuck. These are not the actions of imperialists.
 
I disagree. The Russians had an ' agreement ' with the US that NATO would never attempt to encroach upon previously-Soviet buffer states after Gorbochev relaxed Russian control. NATO has broken that understanding.
The Russians had no option but to defend South Ossetia from Georgian aggression and almost the entire population of Crimea voted for renewed union with Russia. Crimea was always Russian until a drunken Kruschev- himself a Ukrainian- turned an unwilling Crimea over to Ukraine without even so much as a quorum at the Supreme Soviet. Eastern Ukrainians also want union with Russia but Putin has refused to comply for the sake of legality.
Russia was Syria's ally prior to the ' Arab Spring ' subversion by Israel and ' the West ' and Syria is Russia's only warm-water port. Even so, the Russians withdrew from Syria in order to allow events to take their natural course and has only recently intervened because the entire Western-orchestrated and illegal regime-change plan has become a giant clusterfuck. These are not the actions of imperialists.
I do agree Russia has strategic interests in the Uk - but it did sign the Budapest memorandum -in return for Uk giving up nukes
it agreed to territorial integrity and there are many instances of Russian spetsnaz forces ( non-insignia to boot) seen in the east.

Those free elections may or may not be valid, but I do agree there seems to be a plurality of Russian speaking citizens
who want alliance with Russia. The point is though the elections were simply a cover for the Russian incursion.
Incursions pre-date the election.
Not that the US doesn't meddle - who can forget Victoria Nuland's cupcakes in Independence Square!

nuland_pyatt_ukraine2_290_1.jpg

But Russia has been doing more then meddling - troop movements and supplying advanced weapons to Donbass and the east
has been well documented, if denied.
In other words...spy game are expected -invasions are not.

I also agree Russia has legitimate interests in Syria ; but it's geo-political alliances with Iran and Hez
make that more then Syrian "interventionism". It's an imperialistic alliance with Iranian hegemony at play..

One could say the same about the west, except we at least do not allie with regional nation states in Syria -
meddling=yes .but imperialism=no.
 
Russia has to prevent Syria becoming a failed state. If Syria was to collapse entirely then Israel and the US would be free to attack Iran- for the purposes of ' Israel's security '. Only the prospect of leaving Israel's back door open to Assad and Hizb'allah has prevented such an attack to date- that and Obama's statesmanship. Russia must save Syria and strengthen it - as Putin knows full well.

How the tyrannical Sauds would love to see Iran and Lebanon in ruins !
 
Last edited:
I sure the fuck am.
Do you really suggest we go to war with China over a sand dot? Fucking fool.
it's all or nothing with you; being unable to discrimate finer points.
Who called for war with China? However we do have a Pacific Fleet Task force there now - headed by a Aircraft carrier.
Should we not act as a counter to China's territorial grabs? If we don't do it -who will? China is manifest hegemonic claiming the entire sea


D.oJ. was very clear Hil's server was not hacked.
There is no dispute.
no evidence of the logs show hacking -again you fail to see past the myopic obvious
Further there were no classified docs.
disingenuous, there is most certainly info that was classified, and was "born classified" on her server
But again wait for the FBI to define criminality, if not neglet.

Again, these are facts beyond dispute.
Also beyond dispute: State was hacked.
It isn't just about classified or not either dickless wonder.
Hilary (and Bill)
were persecuted for 8 fucking years and left 25 million in debt by ONE (1) "judge" who had since admitted he was wrong and apoligized.

Hilary had damned good justification and her instincts were correct; State was hacked.

By the way, foolish little boy,
the US is also imperialistic.

Goddamn is there anything you are aware of?
non -referenced screed. as mentioned State classified system was never hacked.
You conflate imperialism with power projection , and war with engagement.. facile falsehoods,all
 
it's all or nothing with you; being unable to discrimate finer points.
Who called for war with China? However we do have a Pacific Fleet Task force there now - headed by a Aircraft carrier.
Should we not act as a counter to China's territorial grabs? If we don't do it -who will? China is manifest hegemonic claiming the entire sea


no evidence of the logs show hacking -again you fail to see past the myopic obvious
disingenuous, there is most certainly info that was classified, and was "born classified" on her server
But again wait for the FBI to define criminality, if not neglet.

non -referenced screed. as mentioned State classified system was never hacked.
You conflate imperialism with power projection , and war with engagement.. facile falsehoods,all

Non referenced screed?
Judge Kenneth Starr.
Moron.
Hilary had absolute justification to go to extraordinary lengths to protect her emails.

Justice anounced that NO (zero) none emails were classified. Not a single one.
Considering that it was Hilary's responsibilty to classify documents at State, this is not only obvious but logical as well.
Persisting in wishes and supposition us not winning for you.

Bottom line; Hilary:
No email crimes
No responsibility for Ben Ghazi
Not architect of Libya disaster.

In fact, in 20 years of feral lies witch hunts and acusations, persecution and prosecution, not guilty of anything ever.

You mudslinging gutter rat.
 
it's all or nothing with you; being unable to discrimate finer points.
Who called for war with China? However we do have a Pacific Fleet Task force there now - headed by a Aircraft carrierl

What do you think aircraft carriers are for Dipshit?
Clue; not peace.
Dumbfuck; war isn't even declared anymore.
The entire world is a battlefield according to those who justify deploying drones.

As usual you are war mongering and don't even know it.
China is our only actual threat in the world.
We cannot likely defeat China.
Why would one approve of an agressive act such as sending a Naval fleet there?
You really are dangerously fucked in the head.
 
Non referenced screed?
Judge Kenneth Starr.
Moron.
Hilary had absolute justification to go to extraordinary lengths to protect her emails.

Justice anounced that NO (zero) none emails were classified. Not a single one.
Considering that it was Hilary's responsibilty to classify documents at State, this is not only obvious but logical as well.
Persisting in wishes and supposition us not winning for you.

Bottom line; Hilary:
No email crimes
No responsibility for Ben Ghazi
Not architect of Libya disaster.

In fact, in 20 years of feral lies witch hunts and acusations, persecution and prosecution, not guilty of anything ever.

You mudslinging gutter rat.
except that wasn't her excuse for using a private server -
she said it was for convenience and then used multiple devices anyhow.
She said it was wrong and apologized - leave it to you to find more reasons to apologize for that worthless wretch of a warmonger.

ROLF..who is "Ben Gazi" -

IF you bothered to read the NYTimes - which is no RW fish wrapping of a paper you would see her role.
If you had looked at the Tic Toc In Libya Email - you would see she led in policy ( bombing Libya),
international accord ( bringing on board) = architect and advocate.. but you are so fucking dense
you can't even see the obvious.
Worse you refuse to educate yourself, instead clinging to partial facts as "truth" Intellectual laziness leads to intellectual rot.
You are fisherman rotting from the head like the fish you catch.

Note: Clinton doesn't deny her Libyan role; instead she defends it as "smart power"
There was nothing smart about creating a failed terrorist state out of a Libya that was in good standing with the world community,
and an allie on war on terror in North Africa and beyond.
Such is the desperation of your lies to defend anything by a Democrat - you defend warmongering failures.
You are a partisan hack of the worst sort.

You are unable to discern "classified data" from "classified documents" -about the only thing you got correct was HRClinton was head of Stae and
had the ability to classify on sight -instead she asked her staff to remove classified markings -playing fast and loose on her
crappy server.
You fail to understand the classified State dept server had EINSTEIN protection and was never hacked -
and how classified info got on her server is what this case is all about.
All she had to do was use the classified system for classified exchanges - the fact she NEVER used a classified Email system shows her
gross negligence
But wait for the FBI - as I've said numerous times -reckless as she was -before passing judgement on her criminality.
Which of course you cannot do -preferring blind defense of a Democrat simply because she is a Democrat.

You are rank partisan steeped in hypocrisy, with an inability to discern detail, wiling to jump the shark to proclaim innocence
yet in denial that Clinton was chief architect and advocate of Libya 2011.
You can't sink any lower then moral bankruptcy added to willful ignorance. You area prime example of how rank partisanship
destroys critical thought -even on the rare occasion you display such.
 
Back
Top