Nate Silver on Trump and Republicans

cawacko

Well-known member
I know, I know another Trump post. Looking at this board one would think he's President, not Obama. Haha. Nate Silver is the best in the business, imo, on election predictions and breaking down the numbers. He does it again in this article. His key point here is from the exit polls the percentage of Republicans who say they would be satisfied with Trump as their party's selection. It's a very low number. (Cruz and Rubio do better but not by much) He shows how Trump compares to candidates in the past and shows it compared to Democratic candidates. (Hillary's is much higher)

For those so interested it may be easier to clink on the link to read the column as posting the charts kind of f'd it up below.




Republican Voters Kind Of Hate All Their Choices


If we woke up one day and found that the daytime sky had permanently turned from blue to orange, we’d eventually get used to it. That wouldn’t make it any less strange, however.

So even though the battle between Donald Trump and the Republican “establishment”1 has been a story since the summer, we should still pause now and again to gawk at the spectacle. On Thursday, Mitt Romney, the previous Republican presidential nominee and the closest thing the GOP has to a party elder, denounced Trump in the strongest possible terms. Trump responded by making what sounded to me like a blow job reference.

This is really happening. At least I think.

But as spectacular as the clash between Trump and Republican “party elites” has become, the coverage of it tends to obscure another, perhaps equally important part of the story. Trump does not just divide rank-and-file voters from Republican poo-bahs. He’s also extremely divisive among Republican voters, much more so than a typical front-runner. In exit polls so far, only 49 percent of Republican voters say they would be satisfied with Trump as their nominee — remarkable considering Trump’s lead in votes and delegates. But compounding the GOP’s problems, Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz would leave only slightly more Republican voters happy.

Sean Trende, at Real Clear Politics, wrote about these satisfaction numbers earlier, so my goal here is not to duplicate his work but to provide some additional context. Specifically, it’s to point out that what we’re seeing among the Republican electorate this year is not remotely normal.

The exit polls have asked Republican voters in seven states — here’s Tennessee, for example — whether they’d be satisfied if each of Cruz, Rubio and Trump won the nomination. Remember, these are actual voters — voters who gave Trump a win in six of the seven states where the exit poll asked this question — and not some hypothetical universe of “likely voters.” On average, just 49 percent of these actual Republican voters said they’d be satisfied with Trump. The numbers for the other two candidates were better, but not by much: 53 percent of voters said they’d be satisfied with Rubio, and 51 percent with Cruz.




SHARE OF REPUBLICANS SATISFIED WITH CANDIDATE AS NOMINEE


DATE

STATE

CRUZ

RUBIO

TRUMP


2/9/16 New Hampshire 38 41 51
3/1/16 Alabama 49 47 56
Arkansas 57 58 46
Georgia 55 55 53
Tennessee 50 54 53
Texas 68 59 43
Virginia 43 59 44
Average 7 states 51 53 49

Many Republicans would be dissatisfied with Trump, Cruz or Rubio


Source: National Election Poll Exit Polls

You might wonder whether this sort of thing always happens during a nomination campaign. The short answer is that it doesn’t. By comparison, 79 percent of Democrats this year have said they’d be satisfied with Hillary Clinton as their nominee, while 62 percent have said so of Bernie Sanders.

Eight years ago, the battle between Clinton and Barack Obama was much tenser. With a few notable exceptions in Appalachia, however, both Clinton and Obama were widely acceptable to Democrats in 2008. On average in the 35 states where the exit polls asked the question, 69 percent of Democrats said they’d be satisfied with Obama as their nominee, while 71 percent said so of Clinton:




SHARE OF DEMOCRATS SATISFIED WITH CANDIDATE AS NOMINEE


DATE

STATE

CLINTON

OBAMA


1/26/08 South Carolina 77% 83%
1/29/08 Florida 80 70
2/5/08 Alabama 70 69
Arizona 74 70
Arkansas 83 47
California 76 70
Connecticut 72 73
Delaware 70 69
Georgia 64 79
Illinois 60 78
Massachusetts 78 70
Missouri 67 74
New Jersey 73 66
New Mexico 73 72
New York 78 67
Oklahoma 67 49
Tennessee 76 61
Utah 68 78
2/9/08 Louisiana 63 64
2/12/08 Maryland 69 79
Virginia 64 82
2/19/08 Wisconsin 68 82
3/4/08 Ohio 73 66
Rhode Island 75 63
Texas 70 66
Vermont 70 82
3/11/08 Mississippi 58 69
4/22/08 Pennsylvania 73 64
5/6/08 Indiana 67 66
North Carolina 63 69
5/13/08 West Virginia 74 42
5/20/08 Kentucky 76 43
Oregon 70 79
6/3/08 Montana 67 74
South Dakota 76 69
Average 35 states 71 69

In 2008, most Democrats were happy with both their choices


Source: National Election Poll Exit Polls

How about the Republican race in 2012? The exit polls posed the satisfaction question in only four states, and Romney’s numbers weren’t great. But they were still much better than Trump’s. On average, 63 percent of Republicans said they’d be happy with Romney as their nominee.2




SHARE OF REPUBLICANS SATISFIED WITH CANDIDATE AS NOMINEE


DATE

STATE

GINGRICH

ROMNEY

SANTORUM


1/10/12 New Hampshire 35% 61% 38%
1/31/12 Florida 54 65 53
3/13/12 Mississippi 66 57 67
4/3/12 Wisconsin 67 60
Average 4 states 52 63 55

Republicans were relatively satisfied with Romney in 2012


Source: National Election Poll Exit Polls

I also looked up these numbers for the 2004 Democratic and the 2008 Republican races, elections that bear some similarity to this year’s Republican race because there was no clear front-runner early on. Although it took a while for John Kerry and John McCain to catch on with voters, they eventually became very popular. In 2004, an average of 79 percent of Democrats said they’d be satisfied with Kerry as their nominee, while 77 percent of Republicans said so of McCain in 2008.

Not only is Trump’s 49 percent satisfaction rating lower than any recent party nominee’s, it’s also lower than almost all the losers’. Rick Santorum in 2012 was more widely acceptable than Trump, for example. The only exception was Ron Paul in 2012, although the exit polls asked about him in only two states.



CAMPAIGN

CANDIDATE

STATES POLLED

SHARE OF PARTY’S VOTERS SATISFIED WITH CANDIDATE


2004 Dem. Kerry 16 79%

2016 Dem. Clinton 8 79

2008 Rep. McCain 6 77

2008 Dem. Clinton 35 71

2008 Dem. Obama 35 69

2012 Rep. Romney 4 63

2016 Dem. Sanders 8 62

2004 Dem. Edwards 9 57

2012 Rep. Santorum 4 55

2008 Rep. Huckabee 4 54

2016 Rep. Rubio 7 53

2012 Rep. Gingrich 3 52

2016 Rep. Cruz 7 51

2016 Rep. Trump 7 49

2012 Rep. Paul 2 33


No recent precedent for a front-runner as divisive as Trump


Source: National Election Poll Exit Polls

So how is Trump winning? Partly it’s because the field is so divided, as Trende wrote. Campaign reporters perhaps ought to do more to distinguish between a candidate who is winning 34 percent of his party’s vote, as Trump has done so far, and one winning with 60 percent, as Clinton has. Clinton has a much clearer mandate than Trump does. But it’s also partly because Rubio and Cruz leave many Republicans dissatisfied. Maybe if Romney had run himself?



http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/republican-voters-kind-of-hate-all-their-choices/
 
the thing is the intensity for trump supporters is also sky high.. there is a large amount of enthusiasm in his base. I am sure part of the unsatisfied numbers also have to do with the fact that the establishment republicans are in no hurry to start getting republicans rallying behind him. I mean it's unreal strategically that you have someone like romney today come out blasting someone who is very likely going to be the republican nominee. What trump is in the middle of is a hostile takeover of the republican establishment and the establishment republicans are terrified of that. I honestly think most establishment republicans would rather have Clinton be president.

There is a reason why big money donates to both sides. Do you think those uber rich elite care about social issues like affirmative action? They can send their kids to any private school they want and buy their way into elite universities. Do you think they really care about guns or even gay marriage? No.. not really. With clinton they'll have a pragmatist semi-neocon who will gladly bow to special interests and invade whatever countries they want.

The whole GOP is just blowing the fuck up. This is some house of cards level shit. It's awesome lol.
 
the thing is the intensity for trump supporters is also sky high.. there is a large amount of enthusiasm in his base. I am sure part of the unsatisfied numbers also have to do with the fact that the establishment republicans are in no hurry to start getting republicans rallying behind him. I mean it's unreal strategically that you have someone like romney today come out blasting someone who is very likely going to be the republican nominee. What trump is in the middle of is a hostile takeover of the republican establishment and the establishment republicans are terrified of that. I honestly think most establishment republicans would rather have Clinton be president.

There is a reason why big money donates to both sides. Do you think those uber rich elite care about social issues like affirmative action? They can send their kids to any private school they want and buy their way into elite universities. Do you think they really care about guns or even gay marriage? No.. not really. With clinton they'll have a pragmatist semi-neocon who will gladly bow to special interests and invade whatever countries they want.

The whole GOP is just blowing the fuck up. This is some house of cards level shit. It's awesome lol.

As I saw someone else say today who needs House of Cards when we have this going on in real life? Haha.
 
not to mention clinton and the whole FBI investigation.. now a staffer has been given immunity and the DOJ doens't just randomly give out immunity unless serious shit is going down.
 
the thing is the intensity for trump supporters is also sky high.. there is a large amount of enthusiasm in his base. I am sure part of the unsatisfied numbers also have to do with the fact that the establishment republicans are in no hurry to start getting republicans rallying behind him. I mean it's unreal strategically that you have someone like romney today come out blasting someone who is very likely going to be the republican nominee. What trump is in the middle of is a hostile takeover of the republican establishment and the establishment republicans are terrified of that. I honestly think most establishment republicans would rather have Clinton be president.

There is a reason why big money donates to both sides. Do you think those uber rich elite care about social issues like affirmative action? They can send their kids to any private school they want and buy their way into elite universities. Do you think they really care about guns or even gay marriage? No.. not really. With clinton they'll have a pragmatist semi-neocon who will gladly bow to special interests and invade whatever countries they want.

The whole GOP is just blowing the fuck up. This is some house of cards level shit. It's awesome lol.

I think you're spot on about the passion for Trump from his supporters. I'm sure Romney's speech today only made that passion grow. But there aren't enough of them, imo, to win a national election. And like you said, if enough establishment Republicans don't want Trump he's not going to get enough cross over appeal to win.
 
the thing is the intensity for trump supporters is also sky high.. there is a large amount of enthusiasm in his base. I am sure part of the unsatisfied numbers also have to do with the fact that the establishment republicans are in no hurry to start getting republicans rallying behind him. I mean it's unreal strategically that you have someone like romney today come out blasting someone who is very likely going to be the republican nominee. What trump is in the middle of is a hostile takeover of the republican establishment and the establishment republicans are terrified of that. I honestly think most establishment republicans would rather have Clinton be president.

There is a reason why big money donates to both sides. Do you think those uber rich elite care about social issues like affirmative action? They can send their kids to any private school they want and buy their way into elite universities. Do you think they really care about guns or even gay marriage? No.. not really. With clinton they'll have a pragmatist semi-neocon who will gladly bow to special interests and invade whatever countries they want.

The whole GOP is just blowing the fuck up. This is some house of cards level shit. It's awesome lol.

I believe that this has shaken the liberals up also; because if they don't beat Trump they're afraid that they'll never be able to regain their base, no matter how much they promise to give to people.
 
I believe that this has shaken the liberals up also; because if they don't beat Trump they're afraid that they'll never be able to regain their base, no matter how much they promise to give to people.

If today's polls are to be believed Hillary is beating Trump and after tonight's debate Hillary is probably feeling pretty good about herself. Trump may win over a few blue collar democratic white voters but he gets crushed by minorities. He can't win by the white vote alone.
 
If today's polls are to be believed Hillary is beating Trump and after tonight's debate Hillary is probably feeling pretty good about herself. Trump may win over a few blue collar democratic white voters but he gets crushed by minorities. He can't win by the white vote alone.

So you don't think that the DNC is looking at Trump, his numbers, and thinking, "Maybe we need to rethink how we present ourselves"?
 
So you don't think that the DNC is looking at Trump, his numbers, and thinking, "Maybe we need to rethink how we present ourselves"?

Not at all. Trump has the worst numbers compared to Hillary of all Republican candidates.

However I'll ask you, what do you think Democrats would change because of Trump?
 
Not at all. Trump has the worst numbers compared to Hillary of all Republican candidates.

However I'll ask you, what do you think Democrats would change because of Trump?

I think it's time that all Politicians need to think of changing how they respond to and treat those who vote them into office; but you apparently feel that the DNC is perfect, just the way they are. :palm:
 
I think it's time that all Politicians need to think of changing how they respond to and treat those who vote them into office; but you apparently feel that the DNC is perfect, just the way they are. :palm:

That's an interesting conclusion/projection to come to. Political parties care about one thing, power which comes through winning elections. Seeing as they are beating a Trump they aren't going to change.

If the DNC was to change they should have already learned their lesson based on losing Congress, Governorships and state legislatures at the rate they did post Obama's election. Trump had nothing to do with that.
 
That's an interesting conclusion/projection to come to. Political parties care about one thing, power which comes through winning elections. Seeing as they are beating a Trump they aren't going to change.

If the DNC was to change they should have already learned their lesson based on losing Congress, Governorships and state legislatures at the rate they did post Obama's election. Trump had nothing to do with that.

Just because they CHOOSE not to change; doesn't mean that they shouldn't.
But you go right ahead with your Trump hate and continue to turn a blind eye to the bigger picture.
 
Just because they CHOOSE not to change; doesn't mean that they shouldn't.
But you go right ahead with your Trump hate and continue to turn a blind eye to the bigger picture.

This isn't Trump hate it's just political reality. I do not disagree with you in any way that both parties should change. What causes political parties to change however is losing power. The Republican Party could be in the middle of a big change right now or it could be a blip on the radar. Time will answer that for us.
 
If today's polls are to be believed Hillary is beating Trump and after tonight's debate Hillary is probably feeling pretty good about herself. Trump may win over a few blue collar democratic white voters but he gets crushed by minorities. He can't win by the white vote alone.

Who among your stiff suit establishment candidates can beat Hillary? How about loser Romney ..the face of the elite GOP himself?

He may insert himself in the nominee spot if your people take out trump at the convention.
 
Who among your stiff suit establishment candidates can beat Hillary? How about loser Romney ..the face of the elite GOP himself?

He may insert himself in the nominee spot if your people take out trump at the convention.

If the polls today are to be believed Rubio and Kasich do.
 
This isn't Trump hate it's just political reality. I do not disagree with you in any way that both parties should change. What causes political parties to change however is losing power. The Republican Party could be in the middle of a big change right now or it could be a blip on the radar. Time will answer that for us.

Time has already answered the fact that your type republicans are not going to change the face of the GOP by replacing white blue collars with brown entitlement seekers. This is why you're all in the shitin' mess that you're in and you're going to resort to convention brokering to stop Trump at the expense of millions of potential voters.

Your liberal game plan of amnesty and open borders has failed.
 
Who among your stiff suit establishment candidates can beat Hillary? How about loser Romney ..the face of the elite GOP himself?

He may insert himself in the nominee spot if your people take out trump at the convention.

"Stiff suit establishment?" What do you think Trump is? He's in New York giving money and voting for the Clinton's. You can't get more establishment liberal than that.
 
Time has already answered the fact that your type republicans are not going to change the face of the GOP by replacing white blue collars with brown entitlement seekers. This is why you're all in the shitin' mess that you're in and you're going to resort to convention brokering to stop Trump at the expense of millions of potential voters.

Your liberal game plan of amnesty and open borders has failed.

Last week you were just bragging about the number of "brown entitlement seekers" Trump got to vote for him.
 
If the polls today are to be believed Rubio and Kasich do.

Oh you believe the fantasy polls put out by loser Romney and the GOP establishment. Both of those are only in this to drain delegates from Trump.

Kasich is only still in it to prevent Trump form winning Ohio. Trump already has a double digit lead in Florida.
 
Back
Top