Handguns under 14?

CFM said:
You're the one that thinks it's OK to drive drunk and the only time something should be said to the drunk driver is after they kill an innocent person.
Click to expand...

not only do you have a serious comprehension problem, you can't get over being burned by it. pretty pathetic. oh, and you also have no respect for individual rights. some conservative you are....but then conservatives don't give a damn about individual rights....am I right?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
not only do you have a serious comprehension problem, you can't get over being burned by it. pretty pathetic. oh, and you also have no respect for individual rights. some conservative you are....but then conservatives don't give a damn about individual rights....am I right?
Click to expand...

I don't have to get over anything that didn't happen. It's pathetic you think you did.

I have respect for individual rights and that includes the innocent drivers killed by the drunk ones you think have the right to drive drunk. A drunk driver does not have the right to drive drunk like you think they do and only have to answer to AFTER they kill an innocent person with the right not to be killed by someone driving drunk.
 
CFM said:
I don't have to get over anything that didn't happen. It's pathetic you think you did.

I have respect for individual rights and that includes the innocent drivers killed by the drunk ones you think have the right to drive drunk. A drunk driver does not have the right to drive drunk like you think they do and only have to answer to AFTER they kill an innocent person with the right not to be killed by someone driving drunk.
Click to expand...

Notice how there's no hint of how that drunk driver is supposed to provide compensation to his victims, seeing as how INSURANCE isn't considered legal also.
 
CFM said:
I don't have to get over anything that didn't happen. It's pathetic you think you did.

I have respect for individual rights and that includes the innocent drivers killed by the drunk ones you think have the right to drive drunk. A drunk driver does not have the right to drive drunk like you think they do and only have to answer to AFTER they kill an innocent person with the right not to be killed by someone driving drunk.
Click to expand...

like I said, you care nothing for individual rights...only the ones you think deserve rights. lucky for us, the founders believed as I do.
 
CFM said:
Or maybe not.
Click to expand...



One study published in the Journal of Emergency Nursing Online (October 2001) named the Eddie Eagle GunSafe® program the best of 80 gun accident prevention programs evaluated. Beyond that, the effectiveness of the Program is evident in several ways.

First, fatal firearms accidents in the Eddie Eagle age group have been reduced by more than 80 percent since the program’s nationwide launch, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. NRA feels that gun accident prevention programs such as Eddie Eagle are a significant factor in that decline.

Second, we often receive letters from parents whose children have encountered guns in unsupervised situations and avoided an accident by doing exactly what Eddie Eagle had taught them: “STOP! Don’t touch. Run away. Tell a grown-up.”

Third, the Program has been honored or endorsed by groups such as the National Sheriffs’ Association, the U.S. Department of Justice (through the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention), and the Association of American Educators. The Program also received bipartisan support from 26 state governors, as well as resolutions from 23 state legislatures, recommending the use of the Eddie Eagle Program.

Finally, the fact that 26,000 school teachers and law enforcement officers have taught the Program to over 28 million children verifies the popularity of the Program with those who deal with child safety issues every day.



https://eddieeagle.nra.org/faqs/
 
SmarterthanYou said:
like I said, you care nothing for individual rights...only the ones you think deserve rights. lucky for us, the founders believed as I do.
Click to expand...

Are you claiming a drunk driver has the right to kill others in exercising a right you think he/she has to drive drunk?

Are you saying the founders would have supported a drunk driver killing an innocent person because you think that person should be able to drive drunk? If you do, you're an idiot.
 
Legion Troll said:
One study published in the Journal of Emergency Nursing Online (October 2001) named the Eddie Eagle GunSafe® program the best of 80 gun accident prevention programs evaluated. Beyond that, the effectiveness of the Program is evident in several ways.

First, fatal firearms accidents in the Eddie Eagle age group have been reduced by more than 80 percent since the program’s nationwide launch, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. NRA feels that gun accident prevention programs such as Eddie Eagle are a significant factor in that decline.

Second, we often receive letters from parents whose children have encountered guns in unsupervised situations and avoided an accident by doing exactly what Eddie Eagle had taught them: “STOP! Don’t touch. Run away. Tell a grown-up.”

Third, the Program has been honored or endorsed by groups such as the National Sheriffs’ Association, the U.S. Department of Justice (through the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention), and the Association of American Educators. The Program also received bipartisan support from 26 state governors, as well as resolutions from 23 state legislatures, recommending the use of the Eddie Eagle Program.

Finally, the fact that 26,000 school teachers and law enforcement officers have taught the Program to over 28 million children verifies the popularity of the Program with those who deal with child safety issues every day.



https://eddieeagle.nra.org/faqs/
Click to expand...

That happens in EVERY case?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top