4th Circuit Strikes down Maryland's Assault Weapon & Magazine Ban

[/MSG/]

WE WANT LANDMINES ! YOU'LL NEVER TAKE OUR LANDMINES FROM US

That's how silly proponents of assault weapons for the public sound to those of balanced mind.

No, that is you who is sounding silly. Because you personally dislike people (except Palestinians) from owning arms, you therefore feel they are bad for wanting to do so.

 

[/MSG/]

Now don't be naughty. Come on over here if you want to advance any discussion;
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...s-as-many-as-four-people-and-injures-up-to-20
This thread has become an emotive mish-mash .

My current question is;

"would an unlicenced manufacturer still be protected by the Lawful Commerce in Arms Act if its manufacture was unlawful ? "

A unlicensed manufacturer would be raped by the ATF.

 

[/MSG/]

Not at all. I share the view that the Amendment was never, ever intended to pander to the blood-lust of a multitude of assault-weapon totin' psychotics whose favorite targets are children in schools. It's me that understands that. You've draped yourself in pseudo-indignation that a fairly straightforward requirement of a past era might enable you, and those like you, to arm yourselves to the detriment of those with a deeper understanding. You're the enemy, in fact, and you need to be disarmed.

Then you have the most fundamental misunderstanding not just of the 2A, but of the very nature of Rights to begin with.

 

[moon]

A unlicensed manufacturer would be raped by the ATF.

It's quite clear that I'm referring to patents- and don't bother providing your potted knowledge on the subject. I've already seen examples of that.

 

[moon]

Then you have the most fundamental misunderstanding not just of the 2A, but of the very nature of Rights to begin with.

You'd like to think so- but you're wrong again.

 

[IVAN CHESNOKOV]

You'd like to think so- but you're wrong again.

CORRECTS. RIGHTS IS ONLY WHAT OF GOVERNMENT SAYS YOU HAVE! ALL RIGHTS IS OF AND FROM STATE, HIGHEST MORAL AUTHORITY CAN BE OF HAVING!

 

[USFREEDOM911]

It is the absolute height of stupidity to believe that the framers of the constitution/BoR would enact an Amendment guaranteeing the right of a government regulated army to bear arms after they had just successfully won their independence from a government regulated army that tried to take their arms from them.

come and take them.

Did you enjoy the collection of hyper-bole and strawmen that you had to wade through, in his post?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

CORRECTS. RIGHTS IS ONLY WHAT OF GOVERNMENT SAYS YOU HAVE! ALL RIGHTS IS OF AND FROM STATE, HIGHEST MORAL AUTHORITY CAN BE OF HAVING!

What ever, Watermark.

Maybe you should put some of the energy you use, looking for attention, into becoming employed.