Can Sandy Hook Families Hold the Gun Industry Accountable?

No, my point is crystal clear. The fault must lie elsewhere.

if your point was to hold firearm manufacturers everywhere responsible for the deaths of innocents, then you can start by denying them the ability to sell to government agencies and police departments. that should start reducing the deaths of innocents. when that proves successful, then we can talk about further reforms.
 
if your point was to hold firearm manufacturers everywhere responsible for the deaths of innocents, then you can start by denying them the ability to sell to government agencies and police departments. that should start reducing the deaths of innocents. when that proves successful, then we can talk about further reforms.

No, I believe that some officers of these agencies and departments are permitted to kill under certain circumstances concerning the nature of their employment. You didn't know that ? Such persons would require lethal weapons and certain manufacturers would be required to provide them.

Is that a bambi eating popcorn that you've posted ? Are you in the correct thread ?
 
CFM;


Using a gun to kill is not a 'misuse' of the lethal weapon. That's what it was manufactured to do and that was its manufacturer's intent and it is inherent in its design.
You'll pardon me if I don't respond to all of your anticipated repetitious, infantile and erroneous contributions to this thread- as you've already established yourself as a repetitious, infantile and erroneous twat elsewhere. No need for duplication. Thank you.

EDIT; Having just read the article linked in the OP it's my opinion that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) should be struck down. That's the Democrat Party's intent, I believe. If not then it should be- and given the highest priority.


Just what I thought, run like a cowardly bitch and hide because you disagree with what I say. I suspected as much.
 
No, I believe that some officers of these agencies and departments are permitted to kill under certain circumstances concerning the nature of their employment. You didn't know that ? Such persons would require lethal weapons and certain manufacturers would be required to provide them.

Is that a bambi eating popcorn that you've posted ? Are you in the correct thread ?

Oh, one of those that thinks he should be the one to determine who can and who can't have guns? Did I read that correctly?
 
Why would I go to Baltimore.

Well, at the very least it would keep you from trashing threads for a while- and you might benefit from a big black dude taking you home for some torture lessons.
 
Back
Top