WTFE. Scalia doesn't deserve your hate. But I understand your right to be hateful. May life not hand you tragedy, but if it does, may you not receive what you hand out without apology.
Scalia Dead :D
- Thread starter FUCK THE POLICE
- Start date
WTFE. Scalia doesn't deserve your hate. But I understand your right to be hateful. May life not hand you tragedy, but if it does, may you not receive what you hand out without apology.
I handle on the hate thrown at me quite well on this forum. I have also handled tragedy quite well with no excuses and no apologies. Sorry, you and others who do not know me want to try and shame me on how I feel about Scalia as a judge and the fact that he is no longer in a position to hurt others with his rulings anymore, but I won't be affected by your opinions and I don't feel shame, sorry.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Scalia said plenty of hateful things about people with his cruel and demeaning views and cons need to acknowledge that.
[h=1][/h]
[h=1][/h]
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
lets be honest.....thanking someone who cheers because a man died makes you scum........if anything, I feel a little bad for saying scum isn't better than you....scum probably did nothing to deserve the comparison.......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
link us to an example, ChrispieDesh........
christiefan915
Catalyst
Start with these, PmPfreedumb....
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/scalia-worst-things-said-written-about-homosexuality-court
He argued that “most of the black scientists in this country do not come from the most advanced schools” and that they benefit from a “slower track.”
“They’re being pushed into schools that are too advanced for them,” Scalia said Wednesday of minority students accepted under affirmative action programs.
Read more at http://wonkette.com/596817/justice-scalia-knows-the-blacks-are-too-dumb-for-real-colleges#xaplDE7KCuyaC8sL.99
WASHINGTON -- The equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not protect against discrimination on the basis of gender or sexual orientation, according to Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. In a newly published interview in the legal magazine California Lawyer, Scalia said that while the Constitution does not disallow the passage of legislation outlawing such discrimination, it doesn't itself outlaw that behavior:
In 1868, when the 39th Congress was debating and ultimately proposing the 14th Amendment, I don't think anybody would have thought that equal protection applied to sex discrimination, or certainly not to sexual orientation. So does that mean that we've gone off in error by applying the 14th Amendment to both?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
oh ChrispieDesh......you have such an internal burdon of hatred for conservatives......do you agree with Wonkette that in "referencing an unidentified amicus brief, Scalia said that there were people who would contend that "it does not benefit African-Americans to -- to get them into the University of Texas where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a less-advanced school, a less -- a slower-track school where they do well." is
I think you have misidentified the hateful party in that debate......
go back to your repetitive claims that Republicans cheat in elections and leave real debate to the adults.........
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Yep, Scalia was of the belief that Americans have no right to know who they're being ruled by.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
The way the constitution handles supreme court nominations is the best way to do it. I wish state supreme courts worked the same way.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Kill yourself
No I don't call that democracy. I don't want the supreme court to involve a bunch of dumbfuck americans weighing in on complicated legal issues they don't understand.
We have checks and balances in our system. This is basic third grade stuff. We have some elements of direct voting and some elements where we don't.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
AHHHHHHHHHHHH - I'm sure your parents are so proud of how you feel.
How very liberal of you.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
OHHHHHHHHHH, so you feel it applies to you, also!!
OK, since you insist.
When is everyone going to learn to ignore 99% of what Runela posts.
The only reason he does it, is to see if he can illicit responses that don't agree with his stupidity; because it gives him the attention that he desperately craves.
He's like a 3 year old that's discovered that people react when he says the word fuck and because of the reaction, he continues to say it.
Do you feel better now??
signalmankenneth
Verified User
Hell's prodigal son has come home!
sigh.. he did not argue that you retard. He did not say definitively that they DO benefit from a slower track, he asked a WHAT IF they might benefit.. to challenge the solicitor generals argument. It was a question asked in the vain of the socratic method. That's what his job is.. to make sure the arguments are the best they possibly can be.
And he wasn't saying blacks were dumb, he was talking about how many african americans receive worse schooling, and throwing them into an elite school like harvard via affirmative action might hamper them given how rigorous it can be for someone that maybe hasn't had an elite education up until that point. And that is a PERFECTLY VALID question to ask.
Can you please for once in your life actually try to be informed rather than espouse liberal circlejerk talking points?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You're a fucking lying hypocrite.
Do you intend to have even the slightest bit of honesty??
Darth Omar
Russian asset
The problem with Scalia's line of reasoning was its politically incorrect.