Dem Debate

And I didn't say that's what you said. I was pointing out how you moved the goalposts within the context of one sentence.

LOL. You directly responded to his claim about hundreds of posts by saying there weren't hundreds of threads. LOL
 
LOL. You directly responded to his claim about hundreds of posts by saying there weren't hundreds of threads. LOL

I shouldn't have to explain it like this - but it is JPP after all. His comment made no sense to me. If his point was that there were hundreds of threads on the GOP debate, but only one post on the Dem debate, I could see a point. Which is why I responded that there weren't hundreds of threads.

I wasn't saying or implying that he said that. Sorry to spoil the narrative.
 
I shouldn't have to explain it like this - but it is JPP after all. His comment made no sense to me. If his point was that there were hundreds of threads on the GOP debate, but only one post on the Dem debate, I could see a point. Which is why I responded that there weren't hundreds of threads.

I wasn't saying or implying that he said that. Sorry to spoil the narrative.

Nova: There are hundreds of posts
Thing1: There are not hundreds of threads

LOL. But you're not implying or saying he said that. LOL.

Do you lie to yourself often? Or just occasionally?
 
Nova: There are hundreds of posts
Thing1: There are not hundreds of threads

LOL. But you're not implying or saying he said that. LOL.

Do you lie to yourself often? Or just occasionally?

You'll have to forgive me. I've been posting on other boards, and forget that the IQ level drops significantly when I post here.

I'll try for a more simple explanation: if I wasn't so lazy, I'd have written "There may have been hundreds of posts, but there weren't hundreds of threads."

Get it yet? I won't hold my breath or anything. The point stands: I never said or implied that NOVA said hundreds of threads. That was my own point.
 
You'll have to forgive me. I've been posting on other boards, and forget that the IQ level drops significantly when I post here.

I'll try for a more simple explanation: if I wasn't so lazy, I'd have written "There may have been hundreds of posts, but there weren't hundreds of threads."

Get it yet? I won't hold my breath or anything. The point stands: I never said or implied that NOVA said hundreds of threads. That was my own point.

FYI, you're talking to Legion Troll here.
 
Reading back over it, I'm still not sure what NOVA's point was. That there was some sort of shame or something to hide about the Dem debates?

The GOP is just more interesting this year. Typical NOVA silliness, imo.
 
You'll have to forgive me. I've been posting on other boards, and forget that the IQ level drops significantly when I post here.

I'll try for a more simple explanation: if I wasn't so lazy, I'd have written "There may have been hundreds of posts, but there weren't hundreds of threads."

Get it yet? I won't hold my breath or anything. The point stands: I never said or implied that NOVA said hundreds of threads. That was my own point.

Yes, that is true.
 
You'll have to forgive me. I've been posting on other boards, and forget that the IQ level drops significantly when I post here.

I'll try for a more simple explanation: if I wasn't so lazy, I'd have written "There may have been hundreds of posts, but there weren't hundreds of threads."

Get it yet? I won't hold my breath or anything. The point stands: I never said or implied that NOVA said hundreds of threads. That was my own point.

LMAO... ;)
 
And I didn't say that's what you said. I was pointing out how you moved the goalposts within the context of one sentence.

OK Thingy....I don't know what 'goalposts' you're talking about.....I thought threads and posts was self exclamatory...didn't mean to throw you off.....

No harm, no foul.....
 
Back
Top