By the Way, The National Debt Just Blew Past $19 Trillion - Thanks Obama

RockX

Banned
In case you missed it late last week, President Obama blew past another grim mile post on America's highway toward insolvency and forced austerity, as the national debt surpassed $19 trillion -- a figure larger than the size of US GDP. The Daily Signal puts this towering number into perspective:

On Monday the U.S. national debt hit a new record: $19,012,827,698,418. This is the first time the national debt has ever exceeded $19 trillion. That’s more than $58,000 for each person who lives in the U.S. today (including children). The main culprit behind the rising deficits and debt is growing federal spending—especially among Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare. Traditionally, Congress has set a limit for how much debt the U.S. may take on, known simply as the debt limit. But rather than put a higher limit on the debt, lawmakers and the president have repeatedly suspended the debt limit, most recently in November of last year through March 15, 2017. During a debt limit suspension, the Department of Treasury is authorized to borrow however much is needed to pay all federal obligations that come due. This means there is basically no limit on debt the U.S. may take on.​


The president and his party have staunchly opposed and demagogued all serious efforts to reform the programs that are, by Obama's own admission, the largest drivers of America's long-term debt. Before we move on, click through and read about a new report detailing how the Obama administration deliberately misled the public and Congress during recent debt ceiling debates. As for the mountain of debt American taxpayers (present and future) face, it's important to remember that when one factors in unpaid-for federal promises, known as unfunded liabilities, the "true" debt figure is much higher, frighteningly. When I tweeted about this unprecedented Obama "accomplishment," many liberals replied with some version of, "but Bush!" While very few conservatives would hail the Bush-era GOP's fiscal restraint, Obama's reckless stewardship blows all previous debt accrual out of the water, and it's not even close:


That's right: Over Bush's term in office, the national debt jumped from approaching $6 trillion to $10.6 trillion. Obama accelerated the problem massively, leading to today's $19 trillion mess. Oh, and trying to pin all of 2009's massive federal spending on Bush is a fun little trick that just isn't accurate. That's why fact-checkers have confirmed that Obama is, indeed, the undisputed Debt King in all of US history. Even as the president misleadingly brags about lowering annual deficits from the eye-popping levels of his first term -- never mentioning that he was dragged into budget reductions kicking and screaming by Republicans -- 2016 is expected to witness an uptick in the annual shortfall, and CBO projects annual deficits will again climb back north of $1 trillion by the end of the current budget window. That's in spite of all of Obama's tax increases, by the way. In any case, his fixation on deficits seems intentionally designed to deflect on the record debt he's amassed. Meanwhile, as Hillary Clinton runs for president effectively promising a continuation of the Obama agenda, the American people are increasingly shunning her party.



http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...e-national-debt-just-hit-19-trillion-n2114309


Remember when Obama said that adding $4 trillion in debt was irresponsible and "unpatriotic" back on July 3, 2008??? Once he got in charge, did not seem to bother him so much...
 
He has fucked our country so much, Hillary promises to follow in his footsteps. We cannot afford failed plans anymore.
 
Well, that explains things like where that $82,000,000.00 per day is going (hint: this alone is for the Pentagon's "slush fund").
 
Congrats on the math. Like I said, it's pennies. For your hatred it's trillions but in the scheme of the national debt it's a penny.

How do you manage to extract ' hatred ' out of practicality ?

It ain't personal. It's business.
 
The problem with finding an area of funding to close, such as Israel, is that it's nearly impossible to further discuss any other cuts to the budget. As a result, such areas are never closed, because talks fall apart and everything winds down.
 
The problem with finding an area of funding to close, such as Israel, is that it's nearly impossible to further discuss any other cuts to the budget. As a result, such areas are never closed, because talks fall apart and everything winds down.


Not necessarily. I've made my suggestion for the sake of economy- and moral reconstruction. What's yours ?
 
Oh, I absolutely did. Just as I know it will get worse no matter who the next President is.

I know my math.

fair enough... At some point we will need to elect an adult that will make the tough decisions. Otherwise future generations are screwed.
 
He has fucked our country so much, Hillary promises to follow in his footsteps. We cannot afford failed plans anymore.


How many trillions of dollars do you imagine that Obama has saved by not going to war with Iran ?
 
fair enough... At some point we will need to elect an adult that will make the tough decisions. Otherwise future generations are screwed.

You know that this is more than just the President, right? That it's Congress who actually has to come up with and pass a budget that THEN the President can either sign or veto?

The Republican-led Congress didn't pass a budget for six years, and then when they did they sent a budget that would have stripped funding from Planned Parenthood (based on nothing but lies that the Republicans decided to continue lying about) and stripping the medicaid and low-income supplement portion of the Affordable Care Act (meaning the most vulnerable would lose healthcare coverage - because Republicans don't care about those dirty proles). So of COURSE President Obama vetoed it.

We need a clean sweep from the top to the bottom and to get them ALL out. Not just the President.

And then we just need to install me as the first Emperor of The United Stelakh of America.

It would be glorious. Just imagine the very first news story: "Emperor Stelakh abolished Congress and the Senate, sent all of its members to the Namib to mine individual sand grains, then went out to the Rose Garden to have mint julips with the Sweedish Bikini Team."
 
You know that this is more than just the President, right? That it's Congress who actually has to come up with and pass a budget that THEN the President can either sign or veto?

Yes... that is known. But many on here speak in terms of who was President. They blame Bush for the debt, despite his worst years being with Dems in charge of Congress. They credit Clinton for imaginary surpluses... despite his best years being with the Rep led Congress. Given his comments on Bush, I simply responded in kind. Both of us are aware that Congress is heavily involved and in my opinion far more responsible for the debt situation than any President has been.

The Republican-led Congress didn't pass a budget for six years, and then when they did they sent a budget that would have stripped funding from Planned Parenthood (based on nothing but lies that the Republicans decided to continue lying about) and stripping the medicaid and low-income supplement portion of the Affordable Care Act (meaning the most vulnerable would lose healthcare coverage - because Republicans don't care about those dirty proles). So of COURSE President Obama vetoed it.

Not sure what you are smoking at this point, but it was the REID (Democrat) led Senate that refused to pass a budget.

We need a clean sweep from the top to the bottom and to get them ALL out. Not just the President.

On this, we are in complete agreement.

And then we just need to install me as the first Emperor of The United Stelakh of America.

It would be glorious. Just imagine the very first news story: "Emperor Stelakh abolished Congress and the Senate, sent all of its members to the Namib to mine individual sand grains, then went out to the Rose Garden to have mint julips with the Sweedish Bikini Team."

I'm ok with the above, but I will be your economic adviser.
 
Not necessarily. I've made my suggestion for the sake of economy- and moral reconstruction. What's yours ?

You missed the point in your anti-Israeli, froth-at-the-mouth, hysterical set of mind. So I will restate my point by removing the red cape:

The problem with finding an area of funding to close, such as ethanol subsidies, is that it's nearly impossible to further discuss any other cuts to the budget. As a result, such areas are never closed, because talks fall apart and everything winds down.
 
You missed the point in your anti-Israeli, froth-at-the-mouth, hysterical set of mind. So I will restate my point by removing the red cape:

The problem with finding an area of funding to close, such as ethanol subsidies, is that it's nearly impossible to further discuss any other cuts to the budget. As a result, such areas are never closed, because talks fall apart and everything winds down.

My anti-Zionist state of mind would have saved $2 Trillion on an unnecessary war in Iraq- for ' Israel's security '. Also 5,000 American dead, 80,000 permanently disabled ( any idea how much that costs ? ) , over a million Iraqi dead and over four million displaced- not to mention the rise of ISIS and concomitant costs- for ' Israel's security' . Up your ethanol.

Now that doesn't prevent you from discussing cuts to ethanol subsidies.
 
Back
Top