Clinton Accused Again of Handling Top Secret Info Via Private Email

There are fresh allegations from the intelligence community that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was handling some of the most closely held intelligence secrets available through her private email.

According to a newly revealed letter sent from the Intelligence Community's Inspector General to members of Congress on Jan. 14, "several dozen" of Clinton's emails contained "CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET and TOP SECRET/SAP" information. It wasn't clear how many of those were TOP SECRET/SAP.

SAP is code for Special Access Programs and is said to contain highly secretive intelligence related to the sensitive military programs, capabilities and operations. The existence of the letter was first reported by Fox News.

The intelligence community made a similar assessment this past summer, claiming that at least two emails contained TOP SECRET/SCI information. SCI, or Special Compartmental Information, is also highly sensitive, and refers to the highly coveted and protected sources through which the intelligence was derived, such as satellites or even actual spies. SAP is a subset of SCI.

It's unclear, however, if this new assessment refers to new emails or if it's a review of emails the Intelligence Community has already determined were TOP SECRET. Intelligence officials who spoke to ABC said because of the highly sensitive nature of the subject manner only a handful of people are even cleared to look at them.

Clinton's campaign responded by attacking the Intelligence Community directly. "This is the same interagency dispute that has been playing out for months, and it does not change the fact that these emails were not classified at the time they were sent or received," campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said in a statement to ABC News.

"It is alarming that the intelligence community IG, working with Republicans in Congress, continues to selectively leak materials in order to resurface the same allegations and try to hurt Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. The Justice Department's inquiry should be allowed to proceed without any further interference."

The head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Richard Burr (R-NC), denied the claim from Fallon. "I didn't conspire with anybody," he told ABC News.

While the Justice Department is conducting a investigation into how her emails were handled, it is not known when or if they intend to bring any charges. The FBI has steadily refused to provide comment on its investigation.

http://abc7.com/news/clinton-accused-again-of-handling-top-secret-info-via-private-email/1167035/



grandma-hillary.jpg



Of course she blames the "Right Wing Conspiracy" for her getting caught...can hardly wait to see her behind bars where she belongs.

They're not.
 
What intent did they show for General Petraues?

Did he do a coverup ?
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/officials-new-top-secret-clinton-emails-innocuous-n500586
he classified material included in the latest batch of Hillary Clinton emails flagged by an internal watchdog involved discussions of CIA drone strikes, which are among the worst kept secrets in Washington, senior U.S. officials briefed on the matter tell NBC News.

The officials say the emails included relatively "innocuous" conversations by State Department officials about the CIA drone program, which technically is considered a "Special Access Program" because officials are briefed on it only if they have a "need to know."

As a legal matter, the U.S. government does not acknowledge that the CIA kills militants with drones. The fact that the CIA conducts drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen, however, has long been known. Senior officials, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein and former CIA Director Leon Panetta, have publicly discussed CIA drones.
 
And a true one at that. You don't like being pushed back, curb your own comments.

Christie, its OK, your petsonal hypocrisy self evaluation meter is obviously broken. Repair kits are available, but they require you to first acknowledge you have a problem. I believe even you can do this.
 
Christie, its OK, your petsonal hypocrisy self evaluation meter is obviously broken. Repair kits are available, but they require you to first acknowledge you have a problem. I believe even you can do this.

Lol. You guys are such liars that you can't even keep track of what I say. Go read my last post on the Fiorina thread for an example.
 
Funny, how some people give Cosby the benefit of the doubt but not Hillary. Hillary is guilty, and yet, she has not been tried. I think everyone can be a little hypocritical depending on the subject matter.

HILLARY WAS ACCUSED OF RAPE?? :dunno:
 
You must be soused tonight. You're having way too much trouble following the threads. The investigation couldn't prove one way or the other that Broaddrick was raped. I said I believed she was either raped or sexually assaulted another way.

So if the investigation into the allegations against Cosby can't prove, one way or the other, that the allegations are true; you intend to believe that Cosby is innocent. :good4u:
 
Back
Top