christiefan915
Catalyst
really?......then who hacked your account and wrote post #46?......
Footnotes from Wikipedia, obviously. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations
The superscripts are the tipoff.
really?......then who hacked your account and wrote post #46?......
What classified info did Bill leak?
how did you get the footnotes to press the "Post" button?........you can't say you claimed Broadrick was telling the truth when you posted that she lied.......Footnotes from Wikipedia, obviously. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations
shit for brains liberals......you have to put the pablum in their mouths AND swallow it for them..........
nobody said anything about Bill leaking classified info......I merely pointed out that Bill, Hillary AND Libby all lied to investigators while under oath and obstructed an investigation........
how did you get the footnotes to press the "Post" button?........you can't say you claimed Broadrick was telling the truth when you posted that she lied.......
Libby's main crime was leaking classified info and then lying about it, moron. Try following the chronology of the posts.
You must be soused tonight. You're having way too much trouble following the threads. The investigation couldn't prove one way or the other that Broaddrick was raped. I said I believed she was either raped or sexually assaulted another way.
in post #46 you posted that she contradicted her sworn testimony (aka lied).......whether you are drunk or sober you cannot say both that you believed what she said and that she lied..........oh wait.....you're a liberal........of course you can say both things and even believe you can get away with it.......
Cosby's accusers should have their day in court just like Clinton's accusers did.
You were informed that Clinton's women all had their day in court and their allegations addressed.
and why wouldn't they?......unless you think Hillary will pardon him in exchange for his campaign support......
meanwhile don't pretend you "believed" Broadrick when the only thing I see in your posts here is the claim she lied, whether you wrote it or merely pasted it from wiki makes no difference......
How convenient of you to ignore my comments (#s 56 & 65 in this thread alone) that I believe Clinton did something to Broaddrick, whether it was rape or another type of sexual assault. Convenient and dishonest.
Agnes, you lying bitch!.....both 56 and 65 were posted AFTER I pointed out you had accused her of lying about being raped.......you aren't worth debating with, send me someone with some fucking integrity........goodby..........
You stupid son of a bitch, I've been saying this for months on end, ever since the topic of Broaddrick was raised. I can go through the threads and find more but I'm sure you won't accept them because you are just that much of a hypocrite. FOAD.
How convenient of you to ignore my comments (#s 56 & 65 in this thread alone) that I believe Clinton did something to Broaddrick, whether it was rape or another type of sexual assault. Convenient and dishonest.
Christie, you are nothing if not Zappa light. So disengenuous and incapable of owning it. You made a post that claimed Broaddrick was lying about Clinton raping her. This entire subject is relevant not because Hillary stood by her man, but because she dismissed their accusations-Yet she is now running as a candidate for women. Her female staffers paid less than male staffers of other Senators and power players. But more to the point of the trail of sexual abuses by her husband, she claimed women who are victims of sexual abuses should be believed!
Your posts and attitude show, as they so often do, that you are a hypocrite of Zappa proportion.
Lol. And you said you don't call names. You are a liar who can't hold two different thoughts in your mind at the same time. You pounced on what the official verdict was on Broaddrick and ignored my opinion which was, once again for the idiot gallery, that I BELIEVE SOMETHING HAPPENED BETWEEN BROADDRICK AND CLINTON.
Hope you feel better now that you got in your daily sanctimonious name-calling.
I'm not lying about your being a hypocrite. Labeling your behavior is made easy by your own posts- that's not name calling, it's identifying your behavior. You regulaly post information then attempt to distance yourself from it with silly disclaimers after the fact.
It would be just my opinion that you are often super hypocritical, if it were not for the fact that quite a few posters have likewise pointed it out in numerous threads.
Nothing is more hypocritical than you trying to distance yourself from your name-calling by bringing in other posters. I know what cons here say about me and it's like water off a duck's back. Shall I point out what quite a few posters have said about you? Those on my side of the aisle, of course. It's sad that it's water off your back. This indicates your self imposed blindness to your dishonesty.