the tRump gowth and Palin defection prove the failure of libertarian ideas

Does anyone seriously believe Deshtard is invited anywhere a second time?

I would love to have her at a party just so people would have something to laugh at. Wasn't there a movie about people bringing the biggest retard they could find to a party? Deshtard would win you the prize hands down. In her flawed brain, she will think this post is a sign of her superior intellect. What she doesn't grasp is that even JPP lefties think she is a joke all except KKKhristiefan who shares a burka with Deshtard

Dumbfuck; Irish wins hands down.
 
Do you just spew out words with a slim hope that they will somehow convey a message?

You understand that Austrian and Chicago economic theories are not the same?

You realize that simply saying 'laissez-faire' is meaningless to this conversation?

Do you think capitalism is the poorer choice over communism or socialism?

do they both support 'laissez-faire' ?
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism



Economics[edit]

Libertarians are divided on economic issues: right-libertarians are economic liberals of either the Austrian School or Chicago school and support laissez-faire capitalism,[70] while most left-libertarians (social and individualist anarchists, libertarian Marxists, and left-wing market anarchists) argue in favor of socialist theories such as communism, syndicalism, and mutualism (see Anarchist economics). Daniel Guérin writes that "anarchism is really a synonym for socialism. The anarchist is primarily a socialist whose aim is to abolish the exploitation of man by man. Anarchism is only one of the streams of socialist thought, that stream whose main components are concern for liberty and haste to abolish the State."[71] Other anarchists, including Nicola Sacco, Bartolomeo Vanzetti, and Haymarket affair suspect Adolph Fischer, make the same point: "every anarchist is a socialist, but every socialist is not necessarily an anarchist."[71][72] While social anarchists generally support communism and syndicalism, individualist anarchists emphasize mutualism.[73]

its failed and so have you
 
do they both support 'laissez-faire' ?

Do you even know what those words mean? Keynes, Chicago (supply side), Austrian... they all work with CAPITALISM.

Again... Do you think capitalism is wrong?

Why do you refuse to answer the questions Desh? Are you running away... AGAIN?
 
Main difference between Chicago School and Austrian is that Austrians want a gold backed currency, while Chicago School supports monetary policy in the face of depressions. Otherwise they agree on virtually everything. Austrianism is basically the Chicago School for goldbugs and loons.
 
Main difference between Chicago School and Austrian is that Austrians want a gold backed currency, while Chicago School supports monetary policy in the face of depressions. Otherwise they agree on virtually everything. Austrianism is basically the Chicago School for goldbugs and loons.

True... not a lot of differences, but the above is a BIG difference.
 
its failed and so have you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism



Economics[edit]

Libertarians are divided on economic issues: right-libertarians are economic liberals of either the Austrian School or Chicago school and support laissez-faire capitalism,[70] while most left-libertarians (social and individualist anarchists, libertarian Marxists, and left-wing market anarchists) argue in favor of socialist theories such as communism, syndicalism, and mutualism (see Anarchist economics). Daniel Guérin writes that "anarchism is really a synonym for socialism. The anarchist is primarily a socialist whose aim is to abolish the exploitation of man by man. Anarchism is only one of the streams of socialist thought, that stream whose main components are concern for liberty and haste to abolish the State."[71] Other anarchists, including Nicola Sacco, Bartolomeo Vanzetti, and Haymarket affair suspect Adolph Fischer, make the same point: "every anarchist is a socialist, but every socialist is not necessarily an anarchist."[71][72] While social anarchists generally support communism and syndicalism, individualist anarchists emphasize mutualism.[73]

Shut-up, Daesh.
 
Does anyone seriously believe Deshtard is invited anywhere a second time?

I would love to have her at a party just so people would have something to laugh at. Wasn't there a movie about people bringing the biggest retard they could find to a party? Deshtard would win you the prize hands down. In her flawed brain, she will think this post is a sign of her superior intellect. What she doesn't grasp is that even JPP lefties think she is a joke all except KKKhristiefan who shares a burka with Deshtard

Dinner for Schmucks, with Steve Carrell.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism



Economics[edit]

Libertarians are divided on economic issues: right-libertarians are economic liberals of either the Austrian School or Chicago school and support laissez-faire capitalism,[70] while most left-libertarians (social and individualist anarchists, libertarian Marxists, and left-wing market anarchists) argue in favor of socialist theories such as communism, syndicalism, and mutualism (see Anarchist economics). Daniel Guérin writes that "anarchism is really a synonym for socialism. The anarchist is primarily a socialist whose aim is to abolish the exploitation of man by man. Anarchism is only one of the streams of socialist thought, that stream whose main components are concern for liberty and haste to abolish the State."[71] Other anarchists, including Nicola Sacco, Bartolomeo Vanzetti, and Haymarket affair suspect Adolph Fischer, make the same point: "every anarchist is a socialist, but every socialist is not necessarily an anarchist."[71][72] While social anarchists generally support communism and syndicalism, individualist anarchists emphasize mutualism.[73]




you people live on failsauce
 
libertarians for decades have supported gay marriage, not being foreign interventionists, standing up for civil liberties, being against the police state, being against the privatization of prisions, being against the drug war. All popular issues now co-opted by mainstream politicians from those crazy libertarians who no one would take seriously

You've been eating out of our hand and you don't even realize it, fucking idiot. Pretty soon in a couple of years the country will adopt another part of the libertarian platform. You'll think your favorite career politician just came up with it, and continue to mock those that actually bring these ideas to the mainstream.
 
Back
Top