Muslim filth commit mass rapes in Germany - no surprise there

iolo said:
The really backward bits of Islam - Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia for example - are totally dependent of American backing to continue with their antique shit.
Click to expand...

Who was the nasty Welsh git that said the following?

There were no examples of anyone raping young girls unmolested - they were seen as young tarts who wanted it. What your liars tell you is still bullshit. There is nothing 'politically correct' about those northern shitholes - they are quite as racist as you. What there is is political influence from 'community leaders' who can bring out the vote and don't want their potential supporters, the sexist Nazis, arrested.
Click to expand...

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?63838-Muslim-filth-commit-ma
 
Leonthecat said:
All religion is insanity. Bill and I agree on that. Raping and stoning are barbaric practices whether done in the name of religion or not. Bigotry against gays is also a form of insanity, just as racism is.
Click to expand...

In that case, why do the Americans support the countries that practise those things?
 
Irish said:
Their religion hates women, and basically says they are nothing more then sex toys for men.

Yet liberals, who claim to champion women, say nothing about Islam, or actually support it.

So why is that you might ask?
Click to expand...

How many Muslims have you actually talked to? How many are friends? How many do you know that are married?

I ask this, because you make broad, sweeping assumptions and I have to tell you, from my experience, the strokes you're painting an entire group of people with is patently unfair and, frankly, false.

My best friend, who was more like a brother than a friend, was Muslim, from Iran. His parents got he and his siblings out of Iran just before the Ayatollah Khomeini took power after the Shah was overthrown in the Iranian revolution.

He came to America, went to college, settled down, and married a Catholic woman. He worshiped the ground she walked on, and they were happy together until the day he died (cancer).

I was also friends with his brothers, and many of THEIR Muslim friends. And not a single one of them treated their wives, sisters or daughters as "nothing more than sex toys for men." Quite the opposite, in fact.

Perhaps the problem is that you find only what you seek.

And, let's be honest, here. Really honest.

I don't know if you're religious or not, but if you're Christian, Muslim or Jewish, you've got a problem. All three religions are deeply unfriendly to women.

It's just that people who practice those religions decide whether or not the "women should be subjugated to men" thing is right. Which, of course, means they're hypocrites. But that's another discussion.

Which one are you, I wonder? Religious hypocrite or non-religious?
 
Borboletta said:
Please explain how you can lump homophobia, racism and sexual assault together with stoning women to death? Do you consider refusing to bake a cake for gay wedding to be on a par with stoning a woman to death?
Click to expand...

According to liberals refusing to bake a cake is a far worse crime than stoning women or throwing gays off buildings.

Just how their minds work I guess.
 
Leonthecat said:
Nonsensical practices to the extreme quickly become insanity. I hold the opinion that any religious belief is a form of mental illness to some degree and should always be dealt with as such.
Islam is true certifiable insanity, as is any fundamental religion.
Bill and I are not too far apart on this.
Click to expand...

Yeah but what other fundamental religion, CURRENTLY, is killing hundreds of thousands of people a day and is on a death march to conquer the world?

Everytime you say, So what all religions are X. You are excusing the bad behavior of the islamists and watering down their actions as if its a norm for religious people.
 
Stelakh said:
How many Muslims have you actually talked to? How many are friends? How many do you know that are married?

I ask this, because you make broad, sweeping assumptions and I have to tell you, from my experience, the strokes you're painting an entire group of people with is patently unfair and, frankly, false.

My best friend, who was more like a brother than a friend, was Muslim, from Iran. His parents got he and his siblings out of Iran just before the Ayatollah Khomeini took power after the Shah was overthrown in the Iranian revolution.

He came to America, went to college, settled down, and married a Catholic woman. He worshiped the ground she walked on, and they were happy together until the day he died (cancer).

I was also friends with his brothers, and many of THEIR Muslim friends. And not a single one of them treated their wives, sisters or daughters as "nothing more than sex toys for men." Quite the opposite, in fact.

Perhaps the problem is that you find only what you seek.

And, let's be honest, here. Really honest.

I don't know if you're religious or not, but if you're Christian, Muslim or Jewish, you've got a problem. All three religions are deeply unfriendly to women.

It's just that people who practice those religions decide whether or not the "women should be subjugated to men" thing is right. Which, of course, means they're hypocrites. But that's another discussion.

Which one are you, I wonder? Religious hypocrite or non-religious?
Click to expand...

I was friends with an Iranian in college. He was born in Iran, moved to America and converted to Christianity.

However he kept he extreme anti-western views. Idk why he chooses to live her if he hates US so much.

I'm sure not all practice it, but if you look at places that implement Sharia law, they make women near slaves.

But I was speaking toward ISIS and the lefts silence when it comes to their treatment of women and gays. I hear no outrage like I heard when an indiana restaurant refused pizza to a gay wedding.

Seems very strange.
 
Irish said:
I was friends with an Iranian in college. He was born in Iran, moved to America and converted to Christianity.

However he kept he extreme anti-western views. Idk why he chooses to live her if he hates US so much.

I'm sure not all practice it, but if you look at places that implement Sharia law, they make women near slaves.

But I was speaking toward ISIS and the lefts silence when it comes to their treatment of women and gays. I hear no outrage like I heard when an indiana restaurant refused pizza to a gay wedding.

Seems very strange.
Click to expand...

First things first. ISIS is not America. They are not based on our Constitution. I think they are likely outraged that ISIS gets away with their treatment of women and gays, but we're talking about "American" bigotry, here.

If you want the outrage, I could supply it. I'm just trying to be calm today.

You see, I believe in the Constitution of the United States of America. It provides for certain freedoms - one of which is the freedom from discrimination based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex and sexual orientation (YES, sexual orientation - because the Supreme Court's ruling didn't legalize "gay marriage," it reaffirmed the 14th Amendment's tenets that Constitutional rights must be granted to citizens equally. I'm not sure why the anti-gay bigots can't understand this). The freedom from discrimination also guarantees us the right of freedom from religious persecution.

When I see someone, regardless of their political party, start painting entire groups of people because of where they're from or what religion they practice, you bet I can supply outrage.

Because the Constitution is what makes us citizens of the United States of America, and when even just one of us launches into religious persecution or bigotry of any kind, it strikes at the very heart of the ideals and principles that make us Americans. And that, in turn, irrevocably damages all of us and makes a mockery of what it means to be an American.

It makes us less American, and is an affront to what we should be.

THAT is where the real outrage should be, Irish.

Outrage should be directed at the masquerade of so many people claiming to be "patriots" and "pro-American" who have lost sight of the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution and stand proud on the most unpatriotic, anti-American platform imaginable. And what makes it all the more grotesque is that they don't recognize what they're doing.
 
Stelakh said:
First things first. ISIS is not America. They are not based on our Constitution. I think they are likely outraged that ISIS gets away with their treatment of women and gays, but we're talking about "American" bigotry, here.

If you want the outrage, I could supply it. I'm just trying to be calm today.

You see, I believe in the Constitution of the United States of America. It provides for certain freedoms - one of which is the freedom from discrimination based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex and sexual orientation (YES, sexual orientation - because the Supreme Court's ruling didn't legalize "gay marriage," it reaffirmed the 14th Amendment's tenets that Constitutional rights must be granted to citizens equally. I'm not sure why the anti-gay bigots can't understand this). The freedom from discrimination also guarantees us the right of freedom from religious persecution.

When I see someone, regardless of their political party, start painting entire groups of people because of where they're from or what religion they practice, you bet I can supply outrage.

Because the Constitution is what makes us citizens of the United States of America, and when even just one of us launches into religious persecution or bigotry of any kind, it strikes at the very heart of the ideals and principles that make us Americans. And that, in turn, irrevocably damages all of us and makes a mockery of what it means to be an American.

It makes us less American, and is an affront to what we should be.

THAT is where the real outrage should be, Irish.

Outrage should be directed at the masquerade of so many people claiming to be "patriots" and "pro-American" who have lost sight of the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution and stand proud on the most unpatriotic, anti-American platform imaginable. And what makes it all the more grotesque is that they don't recognize what they're doing.
Click to expand...

We also have the 1st amendment. Right to freedom of religion and speech.

Both are under assault by liberals. Liberals on college campuses want to ban any "unfriendly" speech.

Libs in Britain want to ban Trump for his speech. Do they not realize these are the same steps taken in Orwell's 1984?

What if the powers that be decide all criticism of Obama is hate speech? And start sending people to jail? Very slippery slope.


Also there is no right to sexual orientation in the constitution. The SCOTUS simply said they can get married. So we are going to force places to serve their weddings and take photos of them if they don't wish to, for religious reasons? That doesn't sound draconian?
 
Irish said:
Yeah but what other fundamental religion, CURRENTLY, is killing hundreds of thousands of people a day and is on a death march to conquer the world?

Everytime you say, So what all religions are X. You are excusing the bad behavior of the islamists and watering down their actions as if its a norm for religious people.
Click to expand...
Hundred of thousands a day? Lol
 
Leonthecat said:
Nonsensical practices to the extreme quickly become insanity. I hold the opinion that any religious belief is a form of mental illness to some degree and should always be dealt with as such.
Islam is true certifiable insanity, as is any fundamental religion.
Bill and I are not too far apart on this.
Click to expand...

So Rana's parents are mentally ill and she's also mentally ill, just not as much as they are.
But wait a minute!!
Obama claims to be religious, so does that make him mentally ill also??
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So Rana's parents are mentally ill and she's also mentally ill, just not as much as they are.
But wait a minute!!
Obama claims to be religious, so does that make him mentally ill also??
Click to expand...

Well Obama claims to be a Christian and liberals like Howeycat get very butt hurt when you suggest otherwise.

Which brings up a very interesting question.

A) liberals in this board have disdain for Christianity
B) Liberals in this board have nothing but love for Islam and defend its adherents to the death
C) liberals hate it when you call Obama a Muslim and insist he is a Christian.

Odd isn't it?
 
I Love America said:
Well Obama claims to be a Christian and liberals like Howeycat get very butt hurt when you suggest otherwise.

Which brings up a very interesting question.

A) liberals in this board have disdain for Christianity
B) Liberals in this board have nothing but love for Islam and defend its adherents to the death
C) liberals hate it when you call Obama a Muslim and insist he is a Christian.

Odd isn't it?
Click to expand...

Not really; because the only reason they support him, is so they can tell future generations that they were behind him all the way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top