I asked a question. You answered and asked one of your own, I answered. I presented nothing except a reason why I believe one was simply crude while the other was much more than just crude. Denigrate as you wish, I just wondered if you wanted to rethink the post. I understand your point and even agree with it, but if all you do is what you dislike about others then what are you doing?
If I think it is wrong for the government to pay for the piss-Christ, would it be okay if to make my point by making the government pay me for pissing all over images relevant to other belief systems? If it is wrong, it is still wrong when I do it "too". (I'd have used Buddhism imagery but nobody is pissing on the Buddha.)