Fair Game?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
evince
Truthmatters
an expert said she looked like she was lying.
she claimed o be in denial yet claimed she told a bunch of people.
that is really fishy
the people who say she told them all have reason to hate Clinton
you on he right have a real bad history of getting people to lie for your party
she claimed o be in denial yet claimed she told a bunch of people.
that is really fishy
the people who say she told them all have reason to hate Clinton
you on he right have a real bad history of getting people to lie for your party
cawacko
Well-known member
Translation: I refuse to read the article because I don't want to see FACTS and prefer the partisan posturing of Slate.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
1) Some expert said she 'looked' like she was lying? LMAO
2) AGAIN... do you think that women that have been abused have a stable emotional state? Have you ever known a woman that has been abused? If you did, you would know that is not the case. They do not simply stay in or out of denial, especially early on. But you don't care about that. You just care about your party... above all else... even the truth.
Desh = party over people
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
No retard... no one is pretending that Clinton was convicted. We are saying that YOU are putting party over people. YOU are making excuses to defend your party's hero. YOU are pathetic.
You are wrong...
Victims of crimes should always be believed.
Does that mean...
Should those who pretned to be victims be believed?
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.apj.us/022699DISpatch.html
DATELINE: Palm Beach, Florida -- Investigator Jack Harwood of Palm Beach says Juanita Broaddrick's assertion that Bill Clinton raped her in an Arkansas hotel room 21 years ago is a lie.
Using a Verimetrics Instrument, a cutting edge computerized psychological stress evaluator and lie detector that measures stress levels in a person's voice, Harwood has concluded that Broaddrick did have a sexual encounter with Clinton on the day she claims he sexually assaulted her, but it wasn't forced.
"During her telling of the sexual encounter," said Harwood in an interview published this afternoon by National Enquirer, "she has low stress in her voice, which shows she is being truthful. But she's lying when she couches it as an unwanted assault or attack by Clinton."
Harwood measured the stress in Broaddrick's voice during her February 24th interview on TV's "Dateline" using the Varimetrics device.
One example cited in the article:
After Broaddrick said Clinton bit her lip and had sex with her against her will, [Lisa Myers] asked her: "And there is no doubt in your mind that that's what happened?"
She replied: "No doubt whatsoever."
"Broaddrick is not being truthful in this answer either," Harwood explained. "She has tremendous stress in her voice which shows she is lying."
Hmmmm... looks like I was right about Juanita.
DATELINE: Alexandria, Virginia -- Speaking of polygraph-type devices, it seems some of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's witnesses he called in a case involving presidential accuser Kathleen Willey had problems when they were hooked up to the ol' lie detector, according to Julie Hiatt Steele's defense attorney Eric Dubelier.
Friday afternoon, Dubelier revealed this information during a court session as part of an unsuccessful argument that Starr improperly assembled an obstruction indictment against his client. Steele has claimed that Kathleen Willey asked her to lie on her behalf to Newsweek writer Michael Isikoff to bolster Willey's assertion that President Clinton made an untoward advance.
The exact words of Dubelier: "There is a substantial polygraph issue with regard to their own witnesses... results of polygraph examinations [are] an issue for some of their own witnesses."
The exact information has been ordered to be kept secret by U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton after Starr asserted he is continuing to investigate allegations of perjury and obstruction of justice in connection with the Willey matter.
During the course of the day's motions, Starr dropped from the indictment an allegation that Mrs. Steele tried to obstruct Starr's grand jury investigation by making false statements on CNN's "Larry King Live."
An interesting "fun fat" about Dubelier: he worked as a prosecutor in Starr's office investigating the so-called Filegate matter.
Ms. Steele's trial commences March 30th -- that is, unless Kenneth W. Starr decides to drop the charges and save himself a little embarrassment, or maybe do something useful like investigate statements made by Paula Jones and Linda Tripp on "Larry King Live."
Now, wouldn't it be really ironic if it turned out one of the witnesses with polygraph problems turned out to be none other than Kathleen Willey?
That would be two down -- and a great reason to wire up Paula Jones.
'Nuff said...
DATELINE: Palm Beach, Florida -- Investigator Jack Harwood of Palm Beach says Juanita Broaddrick's assertion that Bill Clinton raped her in an Arkansas hotel room 21 years ago is a lie.
Using a Verimetrics Instrument, a cutting edge computerized psychological stress evaluator and lie detector that measures stress levels in a person's voice, Harwood has concluded that Broaddrick did have a sexual encounter with Clinton on the day she claims he sexually assaulted her, but it wasn't forced.
"During her telling of the sexual encounter," said Harwood in an interview published this afternoon by National Enquirer, "she has low stress in her voice, which shows she is being truthful. But she's lying when she couches it as an unwanted assault or attack by Clinton."
Harwood measured the stress in Broaddrick's voice during her February 24th interview on TV's "Dateline" using the Varimetrics device.
One example cited in the article:
After Broaddrick said Clinton bit her lip and had sex with her against her will, [Lisa Myers] asked her: "And there is no doubt in your mind that that's what happened?"
She replied: "No doubt whatsoever."
"Broaddrick is not being truthful in this answer either," Harwood explained. "She has tremendous stress in her voice which shows she is lying."
Hmmmm... looks like I was right about Juanita.
DATELINE: Alexandria, Virginia -- Speaking of polygraph-type devices, it seems some of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's witnesses he called in a case involving presidential accuser Kathleen Willey had problems when they were hooked up to the ol' lie detector, according to Julie Hiatt Steele's defense attorney Eric Dubelier.
Friday afternoon, Dubelier revealed this information during a court session as part of an unsuccessful argument that Starr improperly assembled an obstruction indictment against his client. Steele has claimed that Kathleen Willey asked her to lie on her behalf to Newsweek writer Michael Isikoff to bolster Willey's assertion that President Clinton made an untoward advance.
The exact words of Dubelier: "There is a substantial polygraph issue with regard to their own witnesses... results of polygraph examinations [are] an issue for some of their own witnesses."
The exact information has been ordered to be kept secret by U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton after Starr asserted he is continuing to investigate allegations of perjury and obstruction of justice in connection with the Willey matter.
During the course of the day's motions, Starr dropped from the indictment an allegation that Mrs. Steele tried to obstruct Starr's grand jury investigation by making false statements on CNN's "Larry King Live."
An interesting "fun fat" about Dubelier: he worked as a prosecutor in Starr's office investigating the so-called Filegate matter.
Ms. Steele's trial commences March 30th -- that is, unless Kenneth W. Starr decides to drop the charges and save himself a little embarrassment, or maybe do something useful like investigate statements made by Paula Jones and Linda Tripp on "Larry King Live."
Now, wouldn't it be really ironic if it turned out one of the witnesses with polygraph problems turned out to be none other than Kathleen Willey?
That would be two down -- and a great reason to wire up Paula Jones.
'Nuff said...
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
LMAO... because she didn't want to be dragged into the scandal in front of the nation... yep... shocking.
Desh =Party over people
cawacko
Well-known member
One person's opinion
cawacko
Well-known member
So Vox is wrong here Jarod?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
ROFLMAO... he was hired by whom desh? The National Enquirer
No REAL test... just his fucking OPINION based on a interview that he was not at. Fucking hilarious the lengths you will go to.
'she has stress in her voice'... NO FUCKING SHIT... she is talking about when she was RAPED.
Desh =party over people
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Show us evidence of the 'tests'... what was done Desh?
It is not Science, that is for sure. Or do you think a woman talking about her rapist isn't going to have stress in her voice?
Must defend Clinton.
Party over People = Desh
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
You understand she was not on a polygraph machine... right?
You also understand that polygraphs can be beaten... right?
You also understand you are now trying to spin this onto 'the right and Clinton' in order to divert the topic away from your abuse of a woman that says she was raped... right?