examples in how republicans cant run government

evince said:
unlike you asshole I have a real life
Click to expand...

Well when you find time from your busy life, would you care to comment on your state underfunding pensions?

You felt compelled to post about a RED state yet conveniently left out your own state.

What is your democrat legislature and governor doing to shore up their pensions?

Shouldn't you be more worried about your own backyard than Kentucky?

I will understand if you can't answer
 
evince said:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...Rss&utm_campaign=usatodaycomnation-topstories
Click to expand...




INDEPENDENCE, Ky. — Before Bert Baldwin retired from teaching in 1994, a financial adviser told her she needed only $80,000 in savings to supplement her pension benefits and avoid money worries later in life.

Now at 81, Baldwin ticks off all the expenses that eat up her pension check each month — utilities, food, transportation. For insurance and property taxes, Baldwin relies on earnings from private investments.

“If I just had $80,000, I could not stay in this house,” she said, sitting in her living room on a recent morning in this Cincinnati suburb. The $2,200 monthly pension benefit “doesn’t cut it, and I’m not an extravagant person.”

And when it comes to severe underfunding in Kentucky's public pension plan for educators, she said young teachers should be nervous.
 
evince said:
fuck off divertaBOT
Click to expand...

Ok. Let me try one more time. If you avoid a direct answer I will have Grind make this a sticky highlighting your ignorance of FACTS for all to see for eternity. This is your last chance

1) You started this thread titled EXAMPLES IN HOW REPUBLICANS CAN'T RUN GOVERNMENT

2) you posted a link about how Kentucky which has a Republican governor had unfounded teachers pensions.

3) The statistic that is quoted in YOUR link is that they need to be funded at a level of 70%. Those below are bad

4) Buried in your link is the fact that California (the state where you live and run by the democrat party) is also below the 70% threshold you use as a marker of proof that republicans can't run government.

Therefore, if according to you 2 makes 1 true because of 3. It stands to reason that 4 must be true using your criteria.

I simply asked you what YOUR state is doing to rectify the situation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top