Someone explain it to me...

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
I find it interesting that the support level for Trump in the United States is equal to that of Bernie Sanders...

Yet Bernie Sanders gets about a tenth of the media attention.

Why are Americans, many of who claim to hate the media, allowing the media to be the tool in which a man like Trump is using to make fools of them?

Trump says in his book, "The Art of the Deal", that the plan is to exaggerations, promise more than you can deliver, be confident in these promises and exaggerations, and that the masses will follow. ITs working for him in this situation. He appeals to the very basic of non-thinking emotional voters who simply care about the image, they cant care about the plan because there is none.

I am embarrassed as an American that he is getting the type of attention he is getting.

Here is the question, Why are a percentage of Americans so willingly fooled by this guys obvious false image?

Why are so many Americans impressed by his words about violating the Constitution and desire to be prejudice against an entire religion?
 
well because he is he top vote getter on the republican side.


the corporate media never does give the dems the same coverage
 
Jarod, why do the Cowboys get shown on National TV so much even when they have a poor record and haven't won anything in 20 years?
 
Its disturbing on several levels.

Especially when you realize that Trump enjoys the same percentage of support as the relatively ignored Bernie Sanders.
 
evince said:
he has more chance than tRump
Click to expand...

So Trump is leading but Bernie has a better chance to overtake Hillary than Trump does to hold on to his lead? Ok.

So which Republican is going to win the primary and TV should all be focusing on instead of Trump Desh?
 
Jarod, a lot of the money markets show Rubio as the eventual nominee. Should he be getting more coverage because of that?
 
cawacko said:
Jarod, a lot of the money markets show Rubio as the eventual nominee. Should he be getting more coverage because of that?
Click to expand...

I think he should be getting more coverage than he is getting. The money markets are historically more accurate than the polling data, so maybe.

At this point, I don't really think media coverage should be based on such things at all.

Media Coverage should be relatively balanced and based on policy, not showmanship.

But, alas in our corporate media, showmanship makes more money.
 
So the front runner should be getting less coverage because you think it's based on showmanship.

Write your news network and let them know
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top