Obama's "forced diversity" plan to turn suburbs into ghettos

ChoppedLiver said:
Would you mind very much if they start in YOUR neighborhood?

I mean, it's not just about safe communities and jobs.

There's more to life than that.

Maybe they will like horses too.

Did you ever think about that?
Click to expand...

Well my family's house isn't really in a neighborhood but more like in the middle of nowhere on the outskirts of a town of just a couple thousand people. Our closest neighbor to my parent's house is probably more than a mile down the road. The house is about 45 minutes outside of Austin though and so I could see it happening closer to the city.
 
I Love America said:
You will be forced to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior
Click to expand...

You will never get through St. Peter's gate. It would be easier to drive a camel through the eye of a needle.
Watermark on the other hand would be welcomed even if 1000 times wealthier than you.
Sucks to be you huh?
 
FUCK said:
spoken like a true poor person that can't tell the difference.

the town I grew up in is very wealthy. We have class. We are elite and our public highschool is in one of the top in the nation. Our high school facilities are better than most universities. We are rich, highly educated, and noble.

We KNOW when the poor unwashed masses are around.

working class apartment complex? Again mott, true suburbanites don't live near factory workers. LMAO.
Click to expand...

So Grind just "knows" when the poor are around.

Spoken like a typical sufferer of affluenza.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
HAHAHA. The board notes that all you have is namecalling. Why can't libs understand that when they stoop to personal attacks, they are telling the board they have no arguments. Sorry to ruin your day.
Click to expand...
Why argue? What have you accomplished when you've bested a fool like you? Nothing!

You want to debate intelligently? Than spare us your stupid assed KKK rhetoric.
 
Norah said:
I need to learn more about what the plan...but we will see where they end up testing it and see if it does ok.
Click to expand...

ChoppedLiver said:
Would you mind very much if they start in YOUR neighborhood?

I mean, it's not just about safe communities and jobs.

There's more to life than that.

Maybe they will like horses too.

Did you ever think about that?
Click to expand...

Norah said:
Well my family's house isn't really in a neighborhood but more like in the middle of nowhere on the outskirts of a town of just a couple thousand people. Our closest neighbor to my parent's house is probably more than a mile down the road. The house is about 45 minutes outside of Austin though and so I could see it happening closer to the city.
Click to expand...

So then, your answer to my question is a resounding NO!

How do I know this? It's because all you did is come up with excuses as to why it should NOT be in YOUR neck of the woods.

These people can't afford to live the lifestyle you have but the guberment may want them to be able to do so, with the taxpayer paying for it. Like I said before, it's not just about safe communities and jobs.

And it CAN be done in your neighborhood. Why do you believe that a subdivision can't be built in your area? Are you people somehow exempt? (And if you are, that can be changed.)

They can make a subdivision out of some farmers/ranchers property and divide it into half to one (or more) acre lots (like they do in Norco, Calif., the town that self-proclaims themselves as "Horse Town, U.S.A." [look it up]) and give them "horse property".

That would give them a house, property, and enough room to put stalls. Horse trails instead of sidewalks. "Green areas" so they can traipse around with their horses. More minority competition at the horse/rodeo/county fair events for you to contend with.

Would you be good with a transformation like that of YOUR neighborhood? Or should the guberment neighborhood transformation be somewhere out of your lifestyle and sight ( A N.I.M.B.Y. {Not In MY BackYard]) for you to be accepting of the idea?
 
ChoppedLiver said:
So then, your answer to my question is a resounding NO!

How do I know this? It's because all you did is come up with excuses as to why it should NOT be in YOUR neck of the woods.

These people can't afford to live the lifestyle you have but the guberment may want them to be able to do so, with the taxpayer paying for it. Like I said before, it's not just about safe communities and jobs.

And it CAN be done in your neighborhood. Why do you believe that a subdivision can't be built in your area? Are you people somehow exempt? (And if you are, that can be changed.)

They can make a subdivision out of some farmers/ranchers property and divide it into half to one (or more) acre lots (like they do in Norco, Calif., the town that self-proclaims themselves as "Horse Town, U.S.A." [look it up]) and give them "horse property".

That would give them a house, property, and enough room to put stalls. Horse trails instead of sidewalks. "Green areas" so they can traipse around with their horses. More minority competition at the horse/rodeo/county fair events for you to contend with.

Would you be good with a transformation like that of YOUR neighborhood? Or should the guberment neighborhood transformation be somewhere out of your lifestyle and sight ( A N.I.M.B.Y. {Not In MY BackYard]) for you to be accepting of the idea?
Click to expand...

I'm not saying no I'm just saying that where my family's house is at it isn't very realistic for something like that. Most people that live in suburbs commute to a nearby big city for work or school but the town I grew up in the "jobs" are on your own property. My parents ranch is a working ranch and so are the surrounding properties. There are subdivisions in the area with some of the new build cookie cutter homes in them that would probably fit the profile better but for them to build something like that in my neighborhood would require private land to be bought for development. If a resident wants to sell off acres to a developer then they can but I couldn't see my parents selling off hundreds or thousands of acres so that they could be turned into subdivisions. Also when it comes to horse ownership you cant just give somebody a half acre with horse stalls and expect them to just have horses and everything be great and you don't just enter a rodeo if you've never even ridden a horse. I've been riding for years and have grown up in the lifestyle. I'm not saying people can't get into it from scratch but it's not that easy. Horses are hard work and so is a working ranch or farm.
 
Last edited:
Text Drivers are Killers said:
HAHAHA. The board notes that all you have is namecalling. Why can't libs understand that when they stoop to personal attacks, they are telling the board they have no arguments. Sorry to ruin your day.
Click to expand...

they insult you because you deserve insulting.


you are a racist and racists are fucking scum



YOU are the problem NOT poor people
 
evince said:
tell me what you know about Greenwood OK?
Click to expand...

El Oh F'ing El again. You know one story about black history yet prounce around like you are some freaking expert. Yet you think a story of white people moving into black neighborhoods and calling the cops on them repeatedly is false. You have the worst white privilege.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top