Vigilante gun Nut KILLS Innocent Man

I like rational application of law, fair trials, and sentences proportional to the crime, I dislike mobs of armed lunatics running around and dispensing death for any and all perceived slights. You are an anarchist, you want mob rule.

That is just a movie running in your head. Git ova it boy and turn on the lights so you can see things as they really are......btw try and deal wid dat kkk guy hiding under your bed.
 
Robbery is theft involving a weapon, grabbing a pack of beer and running out of a store isn't robbery. He retained all rights of a citizen afterward.

A tad shy of a full pack I see....being a citizen does not make one immune to theft charges, does not make one immune from getting shot down like a rabid dog(deservedly so)for attacking another citizen with a big stick.

The more armed citizens we have willing to chase down these dogs.....the better society we will have. If every burglar knew the house he wanted to burglarize belonged to a citizen with a shotgun, pistor or whatever....................do you think he would think twice before breaking and entering? It aint rockit science boy!
 
He was in a bike, he wasn't going to be outmaneuvered. This man just wanted to kill. He was ecstatic when the other man tried to use that log to force the gut chasing him down to keep guys distance and stop stalking him, he was under no threat and got the opportunity to kill.

Does it make you hard?

Rightists aren't human.


bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaa hopefully you will encounter one in a dark alley on a moonless night. hehheh
 
The vigilante could have pulled his gun and threatened the guy with it. He wasn't attacked with the piece of wood.

Look here boy..........if you pull a gun you better be prepared to use it....for those who think like you....I advise you never to own a gun...you would just let someone take it away from you and shoot you with your own gun....natures way of eliminating the weak minded. You hear me boy?
 
Look....Look....Jack is everywhere...da morons prob wishing now they had voted me off heah.............bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
So now robbery and attacking someone = innocent......?????

We should start a poll....who is more stupid, desh or Zappa


That logic didn't work out too well for Trayvon either





Trayvon was dead for defending himself from a fucking stalker you asshole.


I hope no one ever stalks your daughter at night when shes walking home and then shots her when she tries to defend herself from the stalker.


I wish the fuck you evil assholes could see how fucking racist your evil asses are.

racist never see racism anywhere
 
Trayvon was dead for defending himself from a fucking stalker you asshole.


I hope no one ever stalks your daughter at night when shes walking home and then shots her when she tries to defend herself from the stalker.


I wish the fuck you evil assholes could see how fucking racist your evil asses are.

racist never see racism anywhere

Fuck Trayvon. He got everything he deserved.

You know I use pictures of Trayvons dead body for target practice with my AR. It is a thrill.
 
Pretty sure thats not true.
Any other strawmen you want to build out of this beer theft?
Dumbass

It is not a strawman lil Rune... he stated that people should just wait for the cops when a crime is being committed. It is in this thread.
 
And when was he CONVICTED of the crimes you accuse him of?

He was INNOCENT until proven guilty in a court of law...sadly he never got his day in court thanks to a trigger happy gun nut out to satisfy his lust for blood.

So, if you witness someone killing someone else... you are going to continue to pretend he is innocent until after the trial is over?

Seriously... you are reaching desh levels of stupidity now.
 
Correct, his CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS were taken away by a rabid gun nut out for blood.

His right to a FAIR TRIAL was taken away by a vigilante looking to kill.

His right to DUE PROCESS was taken away by another coward with his "courage" strapped to his hip.

If he didn't attack the good samaritan, then you are correct. Unfortunately, like Martin and Brown, this crook decided to attack someone
(at least according to what we know now). At that point, the individual being attacked has a right to defend themselves.
 
Another instance of dead men tell no tales. How quick you guys are to defend the shooter when you don't even know if his story was true or if he was covering his arse.

Irony. How quick you are to convict him when you don't know if his story is true. The same thing you did with Martin... and you were wrong. The same thing you did with Brown... and you were wrong. You always side with the crook/aggressor... you would think you would learn by now they aren't typically going to be the ones telling the truth. Look how quickly Browns fellow criminal LIED to the public. The media ran with it. Gullible idiots fell hook, line and sinker for the 'hands up, don't shoot' bullshit.
 
Shoplifting is not a crime that citizens need to get involved, a mugging, possibly, a rape, very definitely, but shoplifting, unless you just trip them as they run away, or take their picture for identification, but following them out of the store when you aren't police or store personnel, that is above and beyond the call of duty.

That is simply your OPINION. It is attitudes like yours that make people think they can get away with it. They are counting on people like you not helping.

The fact that you think people 'possibly' should help in a mugging is very telling.
 
Back
Top