IF your on the FBI's terrorist watch list, should you be free to own an AK?

[Jarod]

So liberals like arbitrary government ban lists with no due process and don't like the 2nd amendment. Did I get that right?

No, I think the Congress should pass a provision for due process in case someone finds themselves on this list. I've been arguing that since the Bush administration.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Is it just up to the FBI to determine who is on the watch list? Then this could be used as a tool for the government to deny access to weapons to anyone they want.

 

[Jarod]

No, I think the Congress should pass a provision for due process in case someone finds themselves on this list. I've been arguing that since the Bush administration.

I simply find it particularly shocking that Republicans are against equal protection for homosexuals but for gun ownership when it comes to terrorists .

 

[Jarod]

I simply find it particularly shocking that Republicans are against equal protection for homosexuals but for gun ownership when it comes to terrorists .

Republicans seem to be more afraid of gay people then they are of terrorists.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

are you saying that the founders and commentators during the run up to ratification played a big 'fuck you' card to the citizens of a newly freed nation?

The constitution is a piece of paper. People follow the condition because it is convenient to do so. When it becomes impractical, they will not do so. Or, they will fall and be replaced by someone who doesn't care

 

[Jarod]

Republicans seem to be more afraid of gay people then they are of terrorists.

Republicans have affectively said that they believe terrorists are more deserving of constitutional rights then someone who happens to be a homosexual.

 

[cawacko]

I simply find it particularly shocking that Republicans are against equal protection for homosexuals but for gun ownership when it comes to terrorists .

So you would like the government to be able to put anyone on a list with no due process and take away their rights

 

[Micketto]

Is it just up to the FBI to determine who is on the watch list? Then this could be used as a tool for the government to deny access to weapons to anyone they want.

Let's just have the left vote who goes on this list. That's what you all want anyway.


Liberalism 101

 

[Jarod]

So you would like the government to be able to put anyone on a list with no due process and take away their rights

No, see above.

 

[cawacko]

No, see above.

I should have said liberals

 

[Micketto]

homosexuals

gay people

homosexual

You should start a different thread topic.

Or go rub one out so you can focus on this one.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No, I think the Congress should pass a provision for due process in case someone finds themselves on this list. I've been arguing that since the Bush administration.

why should someone be placed on a list without due process first?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

super


banning semi automatic weapons?


see you fucks just lie right into the face of facts


back ground checks?


see you are doing this stupid fucking evil dance to avoid the real discussion.

I stated examples and here is your evil stupid fucking ass pretending I didn't


see why the world is right to hate your evil ass

Ok... so you DO want to ban most guns?

We already have background checks. The guns used in CA were purchased LEGALLY.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

post 183



super just fucking lies and says I gave no example of the types of laws Americans are asking for.



just fucking out right lies right into the obvious FACTS that exist.



these people cant be negociated with .


they are evil


they have NO integrity


they need to be publically shamed for being complete evil assholes who are trying to destroy this country

saying 'background checks' when background checks ALREADY exist is fucking retarded.

What 'sane gun law' would have prevented the shooting?

No one, but you, has suggested banning semi-automatic weapons. the fact that you ranted and raged for numerous posts WITHOUT any ideas is a FACT. Just because you just started with the 'ban semi-automatic weapons' doesn't make me a liar you fucking idiot.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

go do that billy


I don't fear them thinking your fucking lies are something real.

they will likely charge you for wasting their time

all they have to do is read your posts on this board... you would be locked up in a looney bin

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

what the fuck are you rambling on about nut bag

Irony to the billionth degree

 

[Jarod]

why should someone be placed on a list without due process first?

Why are you arguing that now, kinda late arnt you?

 

[Jarod]

So liberals like arbitrary government ban lists with no due process and don't like the 2nd amendment. Did I get that right?

It was not liberals who started this list!

 

[StormX]

It was not liberals who started this list!

So why is Obama and the rest of the Kool-Aid drinkers still asking for it.

If you think you can prove someone is a terrorist, lock him up. If you have probable cause to think he’s a terrorist, and think you can develop proof beyond a reasonable doubt, arrest him. Even if you have only suspicion, follow him, ask people about him, and so on. But if you don’t have enough to prosecute or even arrest someone, you can’t take away his constitutional rights, even if you suspect he’s a terrorist (or if you suspect he’s a drug dealer or a gang member or whatever else).

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Why are you arguing that now, kinda late arnt you?

no, i argued that when it was first created, were you?