CAIR Director on CNN: U.S. ‘Partly Responsible’ For Islamic Terrorism

StormX

Banned
The L.A. Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations Hussam Ayloush said on CNN’s New Day Friday that the United States was partly responsible for terrorism carried out by Islamic terrorist groups like ISIS.

Ayloush made the comments live in San Bernardino, California, the site of a recent shooting attack that left fourteen people dead. Authorities now believe one of the shooters declared their allegiance to ISIS during the attack. “Let’s not forget that some of our own foreign policy, as Americans, as the West, have fueled that extremism,” he said.


“When we support coup leaders in Egypt or other places, when we supports dictatorship, oppressive regimes around the world that push people over on the edge, then they become extremists, then they become terrorists. We are partly responsible,” Ayloush continued. Terrorism is a global problem, not a Muslim problem. And the solution has to be global. Everyone has a role in it.”



If US foreign policy is responsible for “extremism” and terrorism, we have a few questions for Mr. Ayloush. We won’t hold our breath waiting for him to provide answers…
• Mr. Ayloush, did Boko Haram Islamic jihadists in Nigeria kidnap 300 Christian school girls because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Lashkar-e-Taiba’s Islamic jihadists assault Mumbai, India in 2008, killing 175 innocent civilians because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Chechan Islamic jihadists slaughter hundreds of school children in Beslan, Russia because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Al Shabaab Islamic jihadists slaughter 67 innocent civilians in the Westgate Shopping Mall in Nairobi, Kenya because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Jemaah Islamiyah Islamic jihadists kill 202 tourists in bombings in Bali, Indonesia in 2002 because of US foreign policy?
• Did Islamic jihadists kill 191 innocent civilians in 2004 in the Madrid, Spain train bombings?

I could go on and on, but you get the idea…the problem clearly isn’t American foreign policy. The problem is the global Jihadist movement, of which your organization’s parent, HAMAS, is a key component.
 
The L.A. Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations Hussam Ayloush said on CNN’s New Day Friday that the United States was partly responsible for terrorism carried out by Islamic terrorist groups like ISIS.

Ayloush made the comments live in San Bernardino, California, the site of a recent shooting attack that left fourteen people dead. Authorities now believe one of the shooters declared their allegiance to ISIS during the attack. “Let’s not forget that some of our own foreign policy, as Americans, as the West, have fueled that extremism,” he said.


“When we support coup leaders in Egypt or other places, when we supports dictatorship, oppressive regimes around the world that push people over on the edge, then they become extremists, then they become terrorists. We are partly responsible,” Ayloush continued. Terrorism is a global problem, not a Muslim problem. And the solution has to be global. Everyone has a role in it.”



If US foreign policy is responsible for “extremism” and terrorism, we have a few questions for Mr. Ayloush. We won’t hold our breath waiting for him to provide answers…
• Mr. Ayloush, did Boko Haram Islamic jihadists in Nigeria kidnap 300 Christian school girls because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Lashkar-e-Taiba’s Islamic jihadists assault Mumbai, India in 2008, killing 175 innocent civilians because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Chechan Islamic jihadists slaughter hundreds of school children in Beslan, Russia because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Al Shabaab Islamic jihadists slaughter 67 innocent civilians in the Westgate Shopping Mall in Nairobi, Kenya because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Jemaah Islamiyah Islamic jihadists kill 202 tourists in bombings in Bali, Indonesia in 2002 because of US foreign policy?
• Did Islamic jihadists kill 191 innocent civilians in 2004 in the Madrid, Spain train bombings?

I could go on and on, but you get the idea…the problem clearly isn’t American foreign policy. The problem is the global Jihadist movement, of which your organization’s parent, HAMAS, is a key component.

That was quick (debunking "CARE's" decerebrate assessment, that is).
 
The L.A. Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations Hussam Ayloush said on CNN’s New Day Friday that the United States was partly responsible for terrorism carried out by Islamic terrorist groups like ISIS.

Ayloush made the comments live in San Bernardino, California, the site of a recent shooting attack that left fourteen people dead. Authorities now believe one of the shooters declared their allegiance to ISIS during the attack. “Let’s not forget that some of our own foreign policy, as Americans, as the West, have fueled that extremism,” he said.


“When we support coup leaders in Egypt or other places, when we supports dictatorship, oppressive regimes around the world that push people over on the edge, then they become extremists, then they become terrorists. We are partly responsible,” Ayloush continued. Terrorism is a global problem, not a Muslim problem. And the solution has to be global. Everyone has a role in it.”



If US foreign policy is responsible for “extremism” and terrorism, we have a few questions for Mr. Ayloush. We won’t hold our breath waiting for him to provide answers…
• Mr. Ayloush, did Boko Haram Islamic jihadists in Nigeria kidnap 300 Christian school girls because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Lashkar-e-Taiba’s Islamic jihadists assault Mumbai, India in 2008, killing 175 innocent civilians because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Chechan Islamic jihadists slaughter hundreds of school children in Beslan, Russia because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Al Shabaab Islamic jihadists slaughter 67 innocent civilians in the Westgate Shopping Mall in Nairobi, Kenya because of US foreign policy?
• Mr. Ayloush, did Jemaah Islamiyah Islamic jihadists kill 202 tourists in bombings in Bali, Indonesia in 2002 because of US foreign policy?
• Did Islamic jihadists kill 191 innocent civilians in 2004 in the Madrid, Spain train bombings?

I could go on and on, but you get the idea…the problem clearly isn’t American foreign policy. The problem is the global Jihadist movement, of which your organization’s parent, HAMAS, is a key component.

So that was a Muslim that said that.....I heard it and just assumed to some Democrat emptying his hollow head through his big stupid mouth ...
 
Many people do believe it. Many the CAIR dude can explain to the class what shooting a Christmas party up has to do with US policy in the Middle East.
 
Many people do believe it. Many the CAIR dude can explain to the class what shooting a Christmas party up has to do with US policy in the Middle East.

Simple, Islamist.

When America invaded their countries and killed their people, some of them got pissed off.

You understand, jihadist.
 
So that means that, because they pissed us off first, we had every right to retaliate. By your own logic.

Did you really mean to call that logic, lol?

It's the Right Reverand Wright's 'chickens come home to roost' logic that's shared by the left and the Islamists. Though for the latter, it serves as more of pretext for terrorism: their real objective is submission to Islam.

The left has guzzled the punch. They're beyond hope.
 
So that means that, because they pissed us off first, we had every right to retaliate. By your own logic.

It does?

15 Saudis and 4 others from the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Lebanon crashed 4 planes, so we invaded and occupied Iraq and Afghanistan.

Since then we've meddled, bombed and droned just about every other country in the Middle East, except Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Lebanon.

I'll understand if you can't explain how that's logical.
 
Did you really mean to call that logic, lol? It's the Right Reverand Wright's 'chickens come home to roost' logic that's shared by the left and the Islamists. Though for the latter, it serves as more of pretext for terrorism: their real objective is submission to Islam. The left has guzzled the punch. They're beyond hope.


Is "lol" still your code for Allahu Akbar, jihadist?
 
It does?

15 Saudis and 4 others from the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Lebanon crashed 4 planes, so we invaded and occupied Iraq and Afghanistan.

Since then we've meddled, bombed and droned just about every other country in the Middle East, except Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Lebanon.

I'll understand if you can't explain how that's logical.

No, it means they are too easily offended and can't take what is handed back to them. Just look at what happens when a depiction of Muhammad isn't to their liking. They go nuts.
But when some of their peers shoot 14 people, they dare to stand there "worrying about retaliation against Muslims", and keep playing the perpetual victim. Hey, I am glad we don't react the way they do.
 
your fucks have taken masses of people to foreign places and had them poisen their own children an themselves.


they have beaten children to death for having demons inside
 
Blaming all people of muslim faith for nut bag asshole crazies is the same as condeming christainity for the acts of their nut bag crazies

GET IT
 
That was quick (debunking "CARE's" decerebrate assessment, that is).

The assessment once had a cerebellum Princess?:whoa:

You see, you racist gay negro, there must be something you like about others who rip on your lack of intelligence. That's very easy to do.

As I have shown you before, the word decerebrate is also an adjective. And you actually used it in a post yourself as an adjective to describe something soon thereafter.

Unfortunately for you, you are too much of a decerebrate fool to understand that words change over time and are used to name or describe other things and such. It just doesn't set in well to your decerebrate (lack of) mentality. It did for one short post you made and then it was gone.

And I have used the word decerebrate since about 2002 when I first saw someone use it to describe another ignorant and stupid libtard very much like yourself.

I have continued to use the word simply because just about every. single. time. I do use the word, there is some obsessed and decerebrate (also ...brit instead of ..brate) libtard out there who gets in such a twist about it that they have to spend well over an hour of their time making a post about it.

So, once again for the idiot impaired like you, boy...

decerebrate

transitive verb
de·cer·e·brat·ed, de·cer·e·brat·ing, de·cer·e·brates
To eliminate cerebral brain function in (an animal) by removing the cerebrum, cutting across the brain stem, or severing certain arteries in the brain stem, as for purposes of experimentation.

adjective

1. Deprived of cerebral function, as by having the cerebrum removed.
2. Resulting from or as if from decerebration: decerebrate rigidity; decerebrate movements.
3. Lacking intelligence or reason.

noun

A decerebrate animal or person.

Related Forms:
•de·cer′e·bra′tion
noun

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th edition Copyright © 2013 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/decerebrate#americanheritage#fpCHh8iHzM8kThjd.99
 
your fucking Bush lying us to war helped fuel this you idiots.


Abu Garib?


first you called them phoney Clinton wag the dog crap when it helped you fucking party.


remember


your fucking motivated by party not intelligence and facts


spare us your right wing ideas on why the world is like it is.

your never fucking correct
 
Back
Top