Megyn Kelly: Black Man Shouldn’t Look At Cop

The title of the thread, since it contains NO QUOTATION MARKS, is nothing more than a summation of Kelly's comments and NOT a direct attribution.

Apparently simple, basic rules of grammar are beyond your comprehension.
lol.....Jcraft is right.....you can't own your own turds.......
 
Simple. She didn't state what the OP said she stated.

Still waiting on one of you to highlight where precisely the OP states she said what you claim.

Simply highlight where Kelly was quoted in the OP and I will admit I was wrong.

It's been 10 pages now and not a ONE of you has been able to point out the quote from Kelly.

Maybe in another 10 one of you might finally back up your opinion with an actual quote.
 
ROFL...I understand, it appears there are still several JPP crybabies who are supremely butthurt they got schooled yet again.

10+ pages now and still not a single refutation of my claim...just more name calling.
 
Naturally, the Truth Rejector simply ignores the comments that prove his narrative false.

I never claimed they were Kelly's comments, but you go right on lying.

It's your only option when faced with the truth.

Dear dumbfuck; the thread title says: Megyn Kelly: Black Man Shouldn’t Look At Cop

This is painfully obvious unless you're a dishonest dumbfuck on steroids like the DeshTard; she never said those words or even hinted at it. Therefore, the entire premise of the thread is a massive pile of manure which is the same material one could find in your skull.
 
Who claimed Kelly said something?

I don't see any quotation marks in the OP attributing anything specific to Kelly.

You give new meaning to stupid and dishonest. Yeah dumbfuck; when someone titles a thread "Megyn Kelly: Black Man Shouldn’t Look At Cop" one should never assume that you actually meant what you posted.

Moron; lets face it, once more you get caught fabricating bullshit and then pretend that you didn't mean the bullshit you intended.
 
I think zappa and legion took the bill clinton lessons of wordsmithing a bit too seriously. it's like saying 'depends on what the meaning of 'is', is'.
 
The title of the thread, since it contains NO QUOTATION MARKS, is nothing more than a summation of Kelly's comments and NOT a direct attribution.

Apparently simple, basic rules of grammar are beyond your comprehension.

It's not a summation of Kelly's comments you ignorant retard; it is a massive fabrication of what she actually said. You're beyond mere retard.
 
Back
Top