Ben Carson compares some refugees to 'rabid' dogs

Carson may be weak on some of the details, but he knows more about how the world works, than Obama, Hillary or John Kerry do. For example, you wouldn't need to worry about Carson underestimating ISIS; drawing meaningless red lines; leading from behind or etc.

The brain surgeon can catch up on the names of the players. Hillary knows all the names and places, but her assumptions about how to deal with bad guys are all wrong.

It's easy to look at an event like the Paris attacks and *say* the perps are bad guys. We all know that. But if Carson were president he'd still have to work with Congress on taking action against ISIS. People like Carson and Trump overestimate their ability to be persuasive and work with a group, instead of just calling the shots and expecting compliance.
 
No, it does not demonize the entire group. That is simply the left trying to find a way to demonize Carson and part of their need to be outraged all the time.

What Carson stated is correct. We are vetting all of them to make sure the rabid ones aren't getting in.

Carson claims we aren't vetting them.
 
Do you seriously believe Dr. Carson when he says refugees are not vetted?

I seriously think that Obama had no intention whatsoever to vette any Syrian refugees until this shit hit the fan.......at this moment he is frantically scrambling to figure out how to bypass the 18-24 month scenario he stumbled into........
 
I seriously think that Obama had no intention whatsoever to vette any Syrian refugees until this shit hit the fan.......at this moment he is frantically scrambling to figure out how to bypass the 18-24 month scenario he stumbled into........
Is he? I'm sure if he was you could link us to something that could demonstrate that. Or are you just lying again?
Refugees have always been rigorously vetted.
 
maybe it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure it out, but when it comes to brain surgery, he figures it out......

hes sai CHINA was in SYRIA and made bullshit excuses instead of admitting he was WRONG....can you figure out that is half of what makes all you righties so incompetant
 
Is he? I'm sure if he was you could link us to something that could demonstrate that. Or are you just lying again?
Refugees have always been rigorously vetted.

rofl......you want me to link you to what I said I think?......sure, let me lay my forehead on the keyboard a second.....arir8 oqw08rutqw4tq49t40tqw40t..........there, did it work?..........
 
The head of the FBI claims its an impossible task.....his words not mine.


http://tinyurl.com/ptlvqyk

Of course it's impossible to *effectively* vett that many refugees. Which is why advocating their admission is tantamount to allowing access by X number of terrorists. Is ISIS irredeemably violent and barbaric? Yes. Are they stupid? No. The refugee crisis represents a golden opportunity to get ISIS into the belly of the Great Satan.

Several times I asked for an acceptable number for X but no one seems interested in answering it.
 
hes sai CHINA was in SYRIA and made bullshit excuses instead of admitting he was WRONG....can you figure out that is half of what makes all you righties so incompetant

Maybe he didn't admit he was wrong because he is probably RIGHT, idiot.

NOV. 9
American Decline: Chinese forces head to Syria to join with Russia in filling Obama's power vacuum and purportedly fight the Islamic State. A false move involving NATO member Turkey could mean world war.
Russian and Chinese military sources now confirm that Chinese warships are en route to the Middle East to get in on some of the action of humiliating the U.S.
China's entry means two major powers are stepping in to do what the U.S. was unwilling to do against IS.

Several reports also suggested that a large number of Chinese military advisers have already joined Russia’s personnel in the Assad regime’s stronghold Latakia province.
The news come a few days after Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told a UN Security Council meeting that the world can no longer afford to stand by with its eyes closed on what is going on in Syria, while also not “arbitrarily interfere” in the Syrian war.
The Shenyang J-15 warplanes “will take off from the Chinese Liaoning-CV-16 aircraft carrier, which reached Syrian shores on 26 September,” according to the Israeli military and intelligence news website DEBKAfile with news that Beijing is joining Moscow’s venture in Syria.
http://tinyurl.com/o6m2dbb


desh, you must have an IQ of at least 45
 
Of course it's impossible to *effectively* vett that many refugees. Which is why advocating their admission is tantamount to allowing access by X number of terrorists. Is ISIS irredeemably violent and barbaric? Yes. Are they stupid? No. The refugee crisis represents a golden opportunity to get ISIS into the belly of the Great Satan.

Several times I asked for an acceptable number for X but no one seems interested in answering it.

How long do you think it would to vet babies and children? Their resumes are pretty empty.
 
Could dangerous refugees come to the US and carry out a Paris-style attack?

The American backlash against refugees is based largely on the fear that a Paris-style attack could be replicated in America if the US began to shoulder its burden of the refugee crisis. But such a fear is misguided because the process of relocating refugees to America is very different from the way that refugees currently arrive in Europe. Syrians flown to the US will be the most heavily vetted group of people currently allowed into the US, according to the State Department.Each candidate is vetted first by the UN’s refugee agency, and then separately by officials from the State Department, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the Defense Department. The process takes between 18 months and two years.

By contrast, a refugee hoping to reach Europe can pay a smuggler approximately $1,000 (£660) to take them in a dinghy across the six-mile-wide strait between Turkey and the Greek islands.

Upon arrival, a refugee is fingerprinted and then allowed to reach the European mainland even if they do not have identification documents. They are then transported through a succession of European countries until they reach more welcoming countries, such as Germany, Austria and Sweden, where many of them claim asylum. Due to Europe’s Schengen system, which allows anyone to pass between most of the countries in the EU without having to show their passport, a migrant could then easily reach Paris without ever being given a background check by any government official.


http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/nov/19/syrian-refugees-in-america-fact-from-fiction-congress
 
Of course it's impossible to *effectively* vett that many refugees. Which is why advocating their admission is tantamount to allowing access by X number of terrorists. Is ISIS irredeemably violent and barbaric? Yes. Are they stupid? No. The refugee crisis represents a golden opportunity to get ISIS into the belly of the Great Satan.

Several times I asked for an acceptable number for X but no one seems interested in answering it.

What has been the number so far? We have been accepting refugees for some time and how many of them have attacked our nation and how many were from Syria? I seem to remember that the they were mostly Saudis and it seems we let them in with very little concern shown by the very same people who are protesting the Syrian refugees.
 
Tourists and business-people can get in right now on a visa waiver with nothing more than a passport from 38 countries after they pay a fee and fill out a form online.

http://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/visit/visa-waiver-program.html

Now, what terrorist thirsting for panty-pisser's blood is going to register as a refugee and undergo multiple screenings to get here?
 
Back
Top