Christians face being wiped out from the Middle East within TEN YEARS

Why would they trade with someone who has ethnically cleansed them and committed numerous atrocities and war crimes against their people?

Advocating ethnic cleansing is not ok, right.

Religion is not an ethnicity. We'll trade one of their Christian families for one of our Muslim ones. There's no reason it has to be hostile or even forced. Well just tax and regulate the hell out of Islam to help pay for all the problems it causes us, and that will be an incentive for them to leave.
 
If the UN wants to do anything worthwhile, they should realize that Islam is in conflict with the remainder of the world's religions, and develop a strategy of separation. Give them the ME, except for Israel, and prohibit anything more than 1% of the population in the Americas and Europe.

You have a better solution?

You truly believe yours was a solution??? LMAO

So your answer is "no". You don't have a better solution.

Of course I have a much better solution; but it won't change the minds of fools and isolationists who think we can cower behind our border to be safe.

How do you separate Israel from the rest of the Arab world? That in itself is a dimwitted claim that lacks geographic realities.

Do you honestly think that you can discriminate immigrants based on religion; particularly here in the US? Another mentally challenged statement.

Yours aren’t solutions, but rather, emotional eruptions lacking in common sense and intelligence.

The solution was, and may again become, working within Arab nations to promote representative democracy which leads to more prosperity and peace. In a part of the world that has never really known such a thing, it time to stop burying our collective heads in the sand and pretend that the problems that create Al Qaeda and ISIS will just go away.

I supported Bush not only because it was the RIGHT thing to do in Afghanistan and Iraq, but a new way to deal with a timeless problem in the ME. After forty years of failure trying to pay off the tyrants to keep the peace, it was time to try a new strategy.

But unfortunately for us, and thanks to liberal progressives who have their heads permanently stuck up the arseholes, it didn't take long for the hate AmeriKa crowd to see political expedience in condemning the President and the troops for their efforts and declaring the effort a failure almost before the forces were destroyed in Iraq.

It is a shame that Obama has now pissed that opportunity away trying to kowtow to the low information dumbfucks who think we have no business being the world’s leader of liberty and freedom and want to hand that over to idiots like Putin and tyrannical organizations like ISIS.
 
we were lied to war you fucking traitor

No we weren't you fucking ignorant boviating retard.

Democrat Quotes on WMDs:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
 
How do you separate Israel from the rest of the Arab world?
Do you honestly think that you can discriminate immigrants based on religion; particularly here in the US?
The solution was, and may again become, working within Arab nations to promote representative democracy which leads to more prosperity and peace.

1. Israel needs a defensible border. Move the palestinians out and build a wide, defensible border with walls.
2. Yes, because like the 2nd Amendment is interpreted to regulate guns, the 1st can be used to regulate religion. Fully automatic weapons are incompatible with a modern society and so is Islam.
3. That's been tried for decades. Islam is at war with the western world and it's about time we recognized that and dealt with it accordingly.
 
Why would they trade with someone who has ethnically cleansed them and committed numerous atrocities and war crimes against their people?

Advocating ethnic cleansing is not ok, right.

Who cares if they trade with us or not? They have plenty of sand, so can pound it for all I care.
 
Of course I have a much better solution; but it won't change the minds of fools and isolationists who think we can cower behind our border to be safe.

How do you separate Israel from the rest of the Arab world? That in itself is a dimwitted claim that lacks geographic realities.

Do you honestly think that you can discriminate immigrants based on religion; particularly here in the US? Another mentally challenged statement.

Yours aren’t solutions, but rather, emotional eruptions lacking in common sense and intelligence.

The solution was, and may again become, working within Arab nations to promote representative democracy which leads to more prosperity and peace. In a part of the world that has never really known such a thing, it time to stop burying our collective heads in the sand and pretend that the problems that create Al Qaeda and ISIS will just go away.

I supported Bush not only because it was the RIGHT thing to do in Afghanistan and Iraq, but a new way to deal with a timeless problem in the ME. After forty years of failure trying to pay off the tyrants to keep the peace, it was time to try a new strategy.

But unfortunately for us, and thanks to liberal progressives who have their heads permanently stuck up the arseholes, it didn't take long for the hate AmeriKa crowd to see political expedience in condemning the President and the troops for their efforts and declaring the effort a failure almost before the forces were destroyed in Iraq.

It is a shame that Obama has now pissed that opportunity away trying to kowtow to the low information dumbfucks who think we have no business being the world’s leader of liberty and freedom and want to hand that over to idiots like Putin and tyrannical organizations like ISIS.

How is installing democracy in the ME working out so far butt breath?
Have any shining examples of success you would care to share?
I didn't think so, since they are tribal and want their uncle/brother to decide for them.
They like it that way, they don't appreciate or understand free will.
Dumb Yankee is Right for once so of course you disagree.
Stuff your head back up your ass shit stain.
 
1. Israel needs a defensible border. Move the palestinians out and build a wide, defensible border with walls.

That is not feasile even for a tiny nation like Israel. You do realize that there are many Arab workers who commute to Israel from the West Bank and other areas right?

2. Yes, because like the 2nd Amendment is interpreted to regulate guns, the 1st can be used to regulate religion. Fully automatic weapons are incompatible with a modern society and so is Islam.

That's just silly nonsense. We don't judge or deny rights to people simply due to their religion. The problem isn't Islam; it is the abuse of Islam for terrorist/Fascist purposes.

3. That's been tried for decades. Islam is at war with the western world and it's about time we recognized that and dealt with it accordingly.

Wrong; only a small part of Islam is at war with the western world. Most Arabs could care less and love getting US dollars.
 
Who cares if they trade with us or not? They have plenty of sand, so can pound it for all I care.

Do you have any idea how much oil is produced and exported to European nations who do not have sufficient oil resources to support their economies?
 
Do you have any idea how much oil is produced and exported to European nations who do not have sufficient oil resources to support their economies?

Oil is also traded on the world market and subject to the whims of supply and demand. Cut out the Middle East and oil would cost over $300 per barrel.
 
Back
Top