Right Wing hero!

no, fucktard. what we rallied to support is ALL constitutional rights like freedom of speech, thus we ensured that free speech zones would not remain in existence
 
Cowboy is wrong to not pay his grazing fees. Its not optional and if he didnt want to pay then he needed to take the moos elsewhere.
BLM was wrong to let it go for 20 years and then come in like storm troopers. That was expensive and pointless as there were easy ways to recoup the money.
Lots of needless drama and for that public attention was deserved.
 
Where in the Constitution does it say the government cant charge grazing fees on land owned by the Government?
 
Celticguy said:
Cowboy is wrong to not pay his grazing fees. Its not optional and if he didnt want to pay then he needed to take the moos elsewhere.
BLM was wrong to let it go for 20 years and then come in like storm troopers. That was expensive and pointless as there were easy ways to recoup the money.
Lots of needless drama and for that public attention was deserved.
Click to expand...

They didn't let it go, they have been taking legal action against him for many years.
 
"...the people inhabiting said territory do agree and declare, that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within said territory, and that the same shall be and remain at the sole and entire disposition of the United States; and that lands belonging to citizens of the United States, residing without the said state, shall never be taxed higher than the land belonging to the residents thereof; and that no taxes shall be imposed by said state on lands or property therein belonging to, or which may hereafter be purchased by, the United States, unless otherwise provided by the congress of the United States."

Constitution of the State of Nevada...
 
Jarod said:
Article IV Section 3 paragraph 2
Click to expand...

[h=3]Article 4 - The States
Section 3 - New States[/h] <<Back | Table of Contents | Next>>
1. New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.



2. The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
========================================================================================

The Congress shall have Power......not the BLM or any other entity...
there is no 'new land'....there is only existing land within a sovereign state.

and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

the claims of the US.....or OF ANY PARTICULAR STATE.

Territories of the United States

American Samoa
Guam
Northern Mariana Islands
Puerto Rico
United States Virgin Islands
Baker Island
Howland Island
Jarvis Island
Johnston Atoll
Kingman Reef
Midway Atoll
Navassa Island
Wake Island
as was Alaska and the Hawaiian islands before they were granted statehood.

So explain it to us Jarod.....
 
SmarterthanYou said:
no, fucktard. what we rallied to support is ALL constitutional rights like freedom of speech, thus we ensured that free speech zones would not remain in existence
Click to expand...

Actually, my libertarian lunkhead, you rallied to support a free loading liar and racist:

http://www.salon.com/2014/04/24/fox...ght_wing_delusions_about_the_absurd_standoff/

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/...as-authentic-as-the-gondolas-at-The-Venetian#


Funny how you libertarian lunkheads are all hyped about this, yet nary a peep when the descendents of Native People raise the flag concerning ancestral land rights, broken treaties, etc.

Like I've always said, Libertarians are a fucking joke.
 
NOVA said:
Article 4 - The States
Section 3 - New States

<<Back | Table of Contents | Next>>
1. New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.



2. The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
========================================================================================

The Congress shall have Power......not the BLM or any other entity...
there is no 'new land'....there is only existing land within a sovereign state.

and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

the claims of the US.....or OF ANY PARTICULAR STATE.
Territories of the United States

American Samoa
Guam
Northern Mariana Islands
Puerto Rico
United States Virgin Islands
Baker Island
Howland Island
Jarvis Island
Johnston Atoll
Kingman Reef
Midway Atoll
Navassa Island
Wake Island
as was Alaska and the Hawaiian islands before they were granted statehood.

So explain it to us Jarod.....
Click to expand...

Why you can't read and comprehend, yeah, you better explain it to him, Jarod. He does have trouble with words and their meanings.
 
Celticguy said:
Cowboy is wrong to not pay his grazing fees. Its not optional and if he didnt want to pay then he needed to take the moos elsewhere.
BLM was wrong to let it go for 20 years and then come in like storm troopers. That was expensive and pointless as there were easy ways to recoup the money.
Lots of needless drama and for that public attention was deserved.
Click to expand...

The BLM didn't "let it go for 20 years"....check this out:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...ween-cliven-bundy-and-the-federal-government/
 
Sardonic said:
Lol, you are in the minority in your interpretation, sorry.
Click to expand...

Libertarian lunkheads should publish their own version of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights....it would be the most fantastic display of revisionism the world would ever witness!
 
NOVA said:
[h=3]Article 4 - The States
Section 3 - New States[/h] <<Back | Table of Contents | Next>>
1. New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.



2. The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
========================================================================================

The Congress shall have Power......not the BLM or any other entity...
there is no 'new land'....there is only existing land within a sovereign state.

and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

the claims of the US.....or OF ANY PARTICULAR STATE.

Territories of the United States

American Samoa
Guam
Northern Mariana Islands
Puerto Rico
United States Virgin Islands
Baker Island
Howland Island
Jarvis Island
Johnston Atoll
Kingman Reef
Midway Atoll
Navassa Island
Wake Island
as was Alaska and the Hawaiian islands before they were granted statehood.

So explain it to us Jarod.....
Click to expand...

Nova, the BLM IS A FEDERAL AGENCY. That means is functions as part of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WHOSE MANDATE IS DIRECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION.


http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/info/about_blm/history.html

So spare us all your absurd supposition and conjectures, and just deal with the reality! Get educated man! Jeez!
 
Taichiliberal said:
Nova, the BLM IS A FEDERAL AGENCY. That means is functions as part of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WHOSE MANDATE IS DIRECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION.


http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/info/about_blm/history.html

So spare us all your absurd supposition and conjectures, and just deal with the reality! Get educated man! Jeez!
Click to expand...

"The Congress shall have Power ...."

Really ?....so now when we see "federal agency' or "federal government" we can assume that means CONGRESS, as in, the Senate and House.....?

Now thats what I call absurd....

words have meanings fool....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top