More proof that Fox is noise, not news!

Well Dude, Fox Noise does share your stance on fracking.....so it's relevant for me to put down their BS whenever possible, as people seem to believe what they spew. (sorry, I just couldn't resist!)

Nazi propaganda doesn't do it for me!
Obama signed a huge deal with oil companies injecting co2 reducing greenhouse gases.
I'm please the democrats can positively affect energy economics and environmental safety procedures.
I also know chevron and Exxon have created thousands of millionaires.
 
You forget in your example that a harassment claim has to be examined for CORROBORATING EVIDENCE....which can be provided in documents and via testimony by other employees or witnesses. If the aforementioned is found lacking, then the claim is dismissed.

Attkisson offers NOTHING but an ACCUSATION. So until she does, she's just full of it.

Jeezus, it's amazing how you right wing lackeys will pull any half assed example out of your ears to defend even the most blatantly indefensible baloney that your punditry trots out.

Damn Yurt, think it through next time.

not always. there is not always corroborating evidence. and if you accept other people's testimony, then she is not the only who has said this. case closed.

thanks.
 
Aww, the poor widdle schnook can't handle Fox Noise being exposed (yet again) as a bunch of liars and 3rd rate propagandist.....so his response is "leave us blissfully happy folk alone and don't watch it". Ahhh, I'm sure the same thing came out of the mouths of the folk that supported Hitler and the Soviet Union.

Jeezus, when they coined the phrase "willfully ignorant and proud of it", they were thinking of the Teflon Don!

Well I haven't watched Fox News in years. If I watch anything sometime I watch PMSNBC for the laughs.

But you seem upset about it though. I am just trying to spare you the agony
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Aww, the poor widdle schnook can't handle Fox Noise being exposed (yet again) as a bunch of liars and 3rd rate propagandist.....so his response is "leave us blissfully happy folk alone and don't watch it". Ahhh, I'm sure the same thing came out of the mouths of the folk that supported Hitler and the Soviet Union.

Jeezus, when they coined the phrase "willfully ignorant and proud of it", they were thinking of the Teflon Don!



Well I haven't watched Fox News in years. If I watch anything sometime I watch PMSNBC for the laughs.

:lies:

But you seem upset about it though. I am just trying to spare you the agony

And with that, my assessment of the Teflon Don stands.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Well Dude, Fox Noise does share your stance on fracking.....so it's relevant for me to put down their BS whenever possible, as people seem to believe what they spew. (sorry, I just couldn't resist!)


Nazi propaganda doesn't do it for me!
Obama signed a huge deal with oil companies injecting co2 reducing greenhouse gases.
I'm please the democrats can positively affect energy economics and environmental safety procedures.
I also know chevron and Exxon have created thousands of millionaires.

When we went the distance regarding the company mantra about reducing greenhouse gases, you and your compadres either ignored or denied FACTS that I put out to the contrary. So Obama's corporate give-a-way (one of many in his administration) doesn't make it right or change those facts.

As for "nazi propaganda"....like I said, you can find ALL the pro-fracking crap on Fox News punditry and coverage....so like it or not, you're (in part) in league with Nazi's.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You forget in your example that a harassment claim has to be examined for CORROBORATING EVIDENCE....which can be provided in documents and via testimony by other employees or witnesses. If the aforementioned is found lacking, then the claim is dismissed.

Attkisson offers NOTHING but an ACCUSATION. So until she does, she's just full of it.

Jeezus, it's amazing how you right wing lackeys will pull any half assed example out of your ears to defend even the most blatantly indefensible baloney that your punditry trots out.

Damn Yurt, think it through next time.

not always. there is not always corroborating evidence. and if you accept other people's testimony, then she is not the only who has said this. case closed.

thanks.

Unless you can provide ONE case in which someone won a harassment case WITHOUT ANY CORROBORATING EVIDENCE, you're just doing what Attkisson is doing....blowing smoke. You can believe what you will....PROVING IT is a whole other smoke.

Your welcome.
 
And here is the key to Tweedle Dumb's response: ... one does not need Atkins proof, but merely read each days headlines and talking head stories.

So in this bogus Truth Detector's world, it's all opinion, hear say, headlines and "talking heads".....CONTENT, VALID FACTS AND THE TRUTH need not apply. So as long as people are saying what he wants to hear, then TD is happy as a clam in beer!:palm:

Thanks for clearing that up TD....you're a credit to the Fox News audience!

This coming from a brain dead parrott of leftist propaganda who quotes media matters, salon.com and other leftist blogs suggests a profound irony and stupidity.

You naive uninformed leftist twits can't help yourselves when it comes to irony, hypocrisy and erupting with nonstop stupidity can you?

Yes, you lefttards really are THAT stupid.
 
Aww, the poor widdle schnook can't handle Fox Noise being exposed (yet again) as a bunch of liars and 3rd rate propagandist.....so his response is "leave us blissfully happy folk alone and don't watch it". Ahhh, I'm sure the same thing came out of the mouths of the folk that supported Hitler and the Soviet Union.

Jeezus, when they coined the phrase "willfully ignorant and proud of it", they were thinking of the Teflon Don!

Ironic seeing that you like to quote the lying leftist propaganda of Media matters and salon.com isn't it?

You really are THAT fucking stupid and a naive kool-aid swilling Big Nanny Statist dunce.
 
Spare me that tired old Rove mantra, toodles. Just grow a pair and answer this: Are we to just take Attkisson at her word? And if so, how is that adequate journalism from Fox?

Spare me your dullard leftist talking points you gullible uninformed leftist tard.

I'm still waiting for anything substantive from leftist twits like you who spam this forum with nothing but canards, innuendo and leftist talking points propaganda.

But alas, when you are a gullible, naive low information dunce who pray at the alter of the Big Government Nanny State, why bother with mundane things like reality, truth and facts.

Yes, you really are THAt fucking dumb, naive and gullible.
 
And again, how the hell is that "proof"!!??! Any joker can make any type of accusation and offer nothing but their personal experience as "proof"....right up to the point where they are in court! Then all that BS flies right out the window.

As I said to another right wing lackey.....you jokers are STILL wailing like banshees about Obama's birth certificate DESPITE any and all related experiences, documents or testimony. So you look the total fool and hypocrite doing an about face when it comes to Attkisson and Fox Noise.


C'mon Yurt, you're not even trying!

Dear gullible leftist moron; where's your proof she is lying?
 
I'm still looking for factual evidence to support the false premise of the thread; that Fox News is not the news.
 
oh, Vanilla, you have been shown article after article that Fox News is not Fair and Balanced, so that makes you an idiot by your own standard.

Article after article from the likes of far left blogs like mediamatters is not proof of anything, its just more accusations....now if you have a former employee of Fox come
forward with first hand insider testimony that she or he was not allowed to present their story in an unbiased way, that would be a kind of proof....

Fox, like EVERY other news network may report the details of story wrong and when they do they admit that fact and make corrections in short order....

Again, in Nova's world all Attkisson has to do is just say it's so, and voila'!...it is.

But yet, in Nova's world a different standard was placed upon Dan Rather at CBS.

Like I said, somebody give the dumb bastard a beer (or take it away from him) and explain that VALID DOCUMENTATION is needed to substantiate a claim in the world or real journalism...something Fox Noise constantly forgoes.

Nova is some damned stupid, he'll just repeat his idiocy and treat it as proof of itself. No sense in banging my head against that mental brick wall! :)


When a witness comes forward with first hand information, THAT IS PROOF....she is the testimony that proves the accusation, fool.
No different than a witness in a courtroom giving testimony on what they KNOW about the subject......
 
Back
Top