do you think christie ordered the lane closures

do you think christie ordered the lane closures


  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .
i rather liked christie until he was revealed as a corrupt petulant bully that knows how to put on a good act...i should have known better

oh well

He hasn't been shown to be that; but thanks for removing any doubt what an uninformed leftist lying dunce you are. You lefties just love to wallow in lies and distortions don't you?
 
I haven't been here in a while, so I can't remember if it's you who goes out of his way to look like a moron, or just TD?

If not....congrats. This quoted post officially puts you in the category of 'extremely short attention span'.

Now, find any 6 year old to get you up to speed here, and maybe I'll read the rest of the crap you post in this thread.

Probably not.

 
I haven't been here in a while, so I can't remember if it's you who goes out of his way to look like a moron, or just TD?

If not....congrats. This quoted post officially puts you in the category of 'extremely short attention span'.

Now, find any 6 year old to get you up to speed here, and maybe I'll read the rest of the crap you post in this thread.

Probably not.

Great reply Althea. TD and Taft are both freaks.

Oh look; two leftist retards having a whine fest.
 
I don't know how involved in the daily stuff the President is. He strikes me as a micromanager and considering that its clear his chief of staff was involved, I suspect he ordered it.

Now, its possible that he did not order it, but knew about it, part of his daily briefings... hey boss look at what I am not doing with the Benghazi thing, that President will regret not endorsing you!

Finally, I think its unlikely but possible that the Pres. did not know, but clearly he built a team and fostered an administrative staff that felt this was an okay thing to do. They may not have told the President, but did it because he made it clear this was the type of thing he wanted them to do.
Stop trying so hard. You've already established that you're a moron.
 
I don't engage with men who harass women in this manner. And I think people who do should be shamed. I always notice who does and does not as well. Superfreak doesn't. It's one of the few things he's got going for him!

But your hypocritical self does engage with men who harass women in this manner.
Unless you're trying to imply that Rune isn't a man, which is probably closer to the truth.

But wait just a minute.
I thought women wanted to be treated the same as men; but now you want to be treated differently.

Please make up your convoluted logic and get back with everyone.
 
I don't engage with men who harass women in this manner. And I think people who do should be shamed. I always notice who does and does not as well. Superfreak doesn't. It's one of the few things he's got going for him!

how would anyone know that you, either of you are women....it is just as likely that you are today's typical liberal male.....
 
I don't know how involved in the daily stuff the President is. He strikes me as a micromanager and considering that its clear his chief of staff was involved, I suspect he ordered it.

Now, its possible that he did not order it, but knew about it, part of his daily briefings... hey boss look at what I am not doing with the Benghazi thing, that President will regret not endorsing you!

Finally, I think its unlikely but possible that the Pres. did not know, but clearly he built a team and fostered an administrative staff that felt this was an okay thing to do. They may not have told the President, but did it because he made it clear this was the type of thing he wanted them to do.

Epic pwnage.

It's a shame this is getting lost among a pile of vitriol on this thread, because you rather cleverly exposed the weakness of liberals arguing unthinkingly from a script.

Not that they care much, because hypocrisy is the life's blood of liberalism.
 
Epic pwnage.

It's a shame this is getting lost among a pile of vitriol on this thread, because you rather cleverly exposed the weakness of liberals arguing unthinkingly from a script.

Not that they care much, because hypocrisy is the life's blood of liberalism.

:palm: Yeah, the village idiot is "rather clever". You just fall off your very short step stool.
 
WHAT?
Doesn't it sound just as logical, when it's regarding someone you love.
I see. Another genius who believes it possible to compare running the world's most powerful nation, to running the chemical dump of the nation. If you want to discuss Benghazi, perhaps it's best to do so in a thread about Benghazi.

Of course, you'd have to read up on the issue first, as it's clear you don't know anything about it.
 
I see. Another genius who believes it possible to compare running the world's most powerful nation, to running the chemical dump of the nation. If you want to discuss Benghazi, perhaps it's best to do so in a thread about Benghazi.

Of course, you'd have to read up on the issue first, as it's clear you don't know anything about it.

So, at the very least you've backed off the "running the Port Authority" lie.

Now, does your logic about the demands of the presidency stand up to pre-2008 logic? As in "Who is most qualified and experienced to be the American President; a former state executive or a community organizer?"

Consistency is merely an inconvenience to liberals. Hypocrisy is their life's blood.
 
:awesome:

LMAO!

You know, if Watergate (one bugging, one office).... still has liberal panties up in wad, you might wanna listen to what that kid Snowden hiding in Russia has to say.

LMAO!

Reducing Nixon's criminal administation to "one break in, one office".

You really are a retard Mr. Taft.
Remember that vast sucking sound Perot talked about?
That started in 1973 when the first American factory closed and moved manufacturing to China (thanks to tricky Dick).

Ass (sic) usual, your take is wrong, and you are on the wrong side of things in terms of what is good for America.
 
Back
Top